Influence of internal connection length on screw loosening in internal connection implants
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the internal abutment length affected screw stability in an internal connection implant. Materials and methods: Twenty long internal connection implants (Replus system, 4.7 × 11.5 mm) were selected for this investigation. Abutments were assigned to four groups depending on the length of the internal connection (abutments with internal lengths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm, respectively). Each implant fixture specimen was embedded in resin medium and connected to an abutment with an abutment screw. A load of 100 N, applied at an angle of 30 to the long axis of the implant, was repeated for 1.0 × 106 cycles. Reverse torque values (RTV) were recorded before and after loading, and the change in RTV was calculated. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The change in RTV was not significantly different among the groups (P>.05). Screw loosening and fractures were not observed in any groups, and joint stability was maintained. Conclusion: The internal length of the abutment may not significantly affect the degree of screw loosening.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the internal abutment length affected screw stability in an internal connection implant. Materials and methods: Twenty long internal connection implants (Replus system, 4.7 × 11.5 mm) were selected for this investigation. Abutments were assigned to four groups depending on the length of the internal connection (abutments with internal lengths of 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm, respectively). Each implant fixture specimen was embedded in resin medium and connected to an abutment with an abutment screw. A load of 100 N, applied at an angle of 30 to the long axis of the implant, was repeated for 1.0 × 106 cycles. Reverse torque values (RTV) were recorded before and after loading, and the change in RTV was calculated. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The change in RTV was not significantly different among the groups (P>.05). Screw loosening and fractures were not observed in any groups, and joint stability was maintained. Conclusion: The internal length of the abutment may not significantly affect the degree of screw loosening.
참고문헌 (25)
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.537~552 (1999)
- Pjetursson BE, "Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs)", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.97~113 (2007)
- Jemt T, "Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.29~36 (1991)
- Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
- McGlumphy EA, "Implant screw mechanics", Dent Clin North Am, 42, pp.71~89 (1998)
- Winkler S, "Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview", J Oral Implantol, 29, pp.242~245 (2003)
- Sakaguchi RL, "Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.295~302 (1995)
- Haack JE, "Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.529~536 (1995)
- Siamos G, "Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.67~73 (2002)
- Cavazos E, "Preventing loosening of implant abutment screws", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.566~569 (1996)
- Aboyoussef H, "Effect of an antirotation resistance form on screw loosening for single implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.450~455 (2000)
- Binon PP, "The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation", Int J Prosthodont, 9, pp.419~433 (1996)
- Wiskott HW, "Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.249~257 (2007)
- Dixon DL, "Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.270~278 (1995)
- Ohrnell LO, "Single-tooth rehabilitation using osseointegration. A modified surgical and prosthodontic approach", Quintessence Int, 19, pp.871~876 (1988)
- Cibirka RM, "Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.268~275 (2001)
- Bambini F, "Retrospective analysis of the influence of abutment structure design on the success of implant unit. A 3-year controlled follow-up study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.319~324 (2001)
- McGlumphy EA, "Implant superstructures:a comparison of ultimate failure force", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.35~39 (1992)
- Steinebrunner L, "Implantabutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.1276~1284 (2008)
- Khraisat A, "Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.326~334 (2004)
- Wiskott HW, "Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.105~116 (1995)
- Tsuge T, "Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants", Dent Mater J, 28, pp.373~381 (2009)
- Gibbs CH, "Limits of human bite strength", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.226~229 (1986)
- Lang LA, "The influence of abutment screw tightening on screw joint configuration", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.74~79 (2002)
- Piermatti J, "An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems", Implant Dent, 15, pp.427~435 (2006)