‘정신보건법 제정’ 정책 결정 과정에 관한 연구 -앨리슨 모형의 적용-
A Study on the Policy Making Process of the Mental Health Act (1995) in Korea : A Comparative Analysis of Two Different Legislation Periods
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this paper is to produce a policy decision making model most appropriate for formulating mental health policy in Korea. This research will also illuminate the legislation process and make accurate predictions about the revision process of the Mental Health Act. Using the Allison Models, we analyzed the legislation process of for the Korean Mental Health Act from the 1980s to 1995, which was largely divided into two periods. We applied the three types of model to each of these two periods. The results of the comparative analysis show that the process of the Mental Health Act enactment can be explained through by each of the three types of Allison models and that there is no dominant model. However, the analysis shows that, compared with the ‘Rational Actor’ model, the ‘Organizational Behavior’ model and the ‘Governmental Politics’model are better able to explain the decision making process compared to the ‘Rational Actor’model.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to produce a policy decision making model most appropriate for formulating mental health policy in Korea. This research will also illuminate the legislation process and make accurate predictions about the revision process of the Mental Health Act. Using the Allison Models, we analyzed the legislation process of for the Korean Mental Health Act from the 1980s to 1995, which was largely divided into two periods. We applied the three types of model to each of these two periods. The results of the comparative analysis show that the process of the Mental Health Act enactment can be explained through by each of the three types of Allison models and that there is no dominant model. However, the analysis shows that, compared with the ‘Rational Actor’ model, the ‘Organizational Behavior’ model and the ‘Governmental Politics’model are better able to explain the decision making process compared to the ‘Rational Actor’model.
참고문헌 (16)
- Kim KT, "Social work in mental health" (2001), Yangseowon
- Jong WC, "Social work in mental health" (2000), Hakmonsa
- Yang OK, "Mental health social work" (2006), Nanam
- Kwon JS, "Social work in mental health" (2009), Kongdongche
- Allison GT, "Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis 2nd ed" (1999), Longman
- 이부영, "공부하는 학회이고자 노력했다. In: 학회 활동을 돌아보며", pp.82~93 (1992), 대한신경정신의학회
- 이성우, "한국정신보건법의 전망. In:정신보건정책 전반에 관한 워크샵 보고서", pp.29~34 (1985), 대한신경정신의학회
- 이호영, "정신보건법 시련 In: 학회 활동을 돌아보며", pp.102~128 (1992), 대한신경정신의학회
- 김광일, "국가정신질환관리 발전방향. In: 정신보건정책에 관한 세미나 결과보고", pp.84~108 (1987), 보건사회부
- 유원하, "국가정신건강 정책방향. In: 정신보건정책에 관한 세미나 결과보고", pp.11~17 (1987), 보건사회부
- Kim IY, "A Recently study of Korean mental health act", Mental Health Research, 13, pp.139~211 (1994)
- 박영도, "정신보건법의 입법방향" (1992), 한국법제연구원
- Oh CS, "The mental health act and mental health social work", Journal of Hannam University, 27, pp.99~117 (1997)
- 보건복지부, "정신보건법 제정. 당정협의자료집" (1995), 보건복지부
- Kim JH, "The study on legislating process of the mental health act", pp.2003
- Kim HR, "A Study of the interest groups on legislating of mental health act in Korea", KJSW, 18, pp.1~24 (1991)