본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of Scaffolding Types and Individual Metacognition Levels on Learning Achievement in Online Collaborative Argumentation

김회수|Yipin Huang|Xiaoli Zheng
한국교육공학회 (Korean Society Of Educational Technology)|2021.10|Educational Technology International|제22권 제2호|pp. 311-339

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ScaffoldingLearning achievementIndividual metacognitionOnline collaborative argumentation
주제분류교육학

초록

This study examined the effects of scaffolding types (Toulmin’s Argument Pattern: TAP or Argumentation Vee Diagram: AVD) and individual metacognition levels (low or high) on students’ learning achievement in online collaborative argumentation. A total of 191 Chinese undergraduates took part in this study. They were randomly assigned to either the TAP scaffolding, AVD scaffolding, or no scaffolding condition. They were teamed up in small groups of two or three students to argue with their peers using SNS as the online collaborative argumentation environment. The results revealed that students in the TAP and AVD scaffolding conditions did not gain significantly higher retention or transfer scores than students without scaffolding. However, students in the TAP scaffolding condition significantly outperformed those in the AVD scaffolding condition on transfer scores. Individual metacognition did not significantly affect learning achievement in online collaborative argumentation. Additionally, there was no significant interaction effect between scaffolding types and individual metacognition levels on retention or on transfer. The findings have implications for scaffolding design for online collaborative argumentation and also suggest that more attention should be paid to social metacognition rather than to individual metacognition when students work collaboratively.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of scaffolding types (Toulmin’s Argument Pattern: TAP or Argumentation Vee Diagram: AVD) and individual metacognition levels (low or high) on students’ learning achievement in online collaborative argumentation. A total of 191 Chinese undergraduates took part in this study. They were randomly assigned to either the TAP scaffolding, AVD scaffolding, or no scaffolding condition. They were teamed up in small groups of two or three students to argue with their peers using SNS as the online collaborative argumentation environment. The results revealed that students in the TAP and AVD scaffolding conditions did not gain significantly higher retention or transfer scores than students without scaffolding. However, students in the TAP scaffolding condition significantly outperformed those in the AVD scaffolding condition on transfer scores. Individual metacognition did not significantly affect learning achievement in online collaborative argumentation. Additionally, there was no significant interaction effect between scaffolding types and individual metacognition levels on retention or on transfer. The findings have implications for scaffolding design for online collaborative argumentation and also suggest that more attention should be paid to social metacognition rather than to individual metacognition when students work collaboratively.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. An, Y. J., "Scaffolding wiki-based, ill-structured problem solving in an online environment", Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), pp.723~734 (2010)
  2. Andriessen, J., "The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.443~460 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  3. Baker, M., "Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), pp.315~357 (2007)
  4. Beach, R., "Using social networking for online role-plays to develop students' argumentative strategies", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), pp.165~181 (2011)
  5. Belland, B. R., "Scaffolding argumentation about water quality : A mixed-method study in a rural middle school", Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), pp.325~353 (2015)
  6. Chinn, C. A., "Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology", pp.355~383 (2006), Erlbaum
  7. Cho, K. L., "The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving", Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), pp.5~22 (2002)
  8. Curran, P. J., "The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis", Psychological Methods, 1(1), pp.16~29 (1996)
  9. Dori, Y. J., "Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension", International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), pp.1198~1220 (2018)
  10. Feng, C. Y., "The effects of goal specificity and scaffolding on programming performance and self-regulation in game design", British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), pp.285~302 (2014)
  11. Flavell, J. H., "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry", American Psychologist, 34(10), pp.906~911 (1979)
  12. Garcia-Mila, M., "Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research", pp.29~45 (2008), Springer
  13. Garrecht, C., "‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’–the role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, pp.1~22 (2021)
  14. Golanics, J. D., "Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), pp.167~180 (2008)
  15. Goos, M., "Socially mediated metacognition : Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), pp.193~223 (2002)
  16. Greenhow, C., "Re-thinking scientific literacy out-of-school : Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application", Computers in Human Behavior, 53, pp.593~604 (2015)
  17. Guilfoyle, L., "Students’ argumentation in the contexts of science, religious education, and interdisciplinary science-religious education scenarios", Research in Science & Technological Education, pp.1~18 (2021)
  18. Gul, F., "Relationship between metacognition, goal orientation and academic achievement", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, pp.1864~1868 (2012)
  19. Iiskala, T., "Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes", Learning and Instruction, 21(3), pp.379~393 (2011)
  20. Jafarigohar, M., "The impact of scaffolding mechanisms on EFL learners’ individual and socially shared metacognition in writing", Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), pp.211~225 (2017)
  21. Jin, Q., "Supporting elementary students’ scientific argumentation with argument-focused metacognitive scaffolds (AMS)", International Journal of Science Education, pp.1~23 (2021)
  22. Jonassen, D. H., "Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction" (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum
  23. Jonassen, D. H., "Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines", Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), pp.439~457 (2010)
  24. Kern, C. L., "The effect of scaffolding strategies for inscriptions and argumentation in a science cyberlearning environment", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), pp.33~43 (2017)
  25. 김회수, "웹 기반 하이퍼텍스트 학습에서 협동학습, 그래픽 조직자와 공유인지가 메타인지와 작동기억 부하 분산 및 상황모형 구축에 미치는 효과", 교육공학연구, 27(2), pp.289~315 (2011), 한국교육공학회
  26. Kim, J. Y., "Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level", Computers & Education, 138, pp.116~129 (2019)
  27. Kim, N. J., "Influence of scaffolding on information literacy and argumentation skills in virtual field trips and problem-based learning for scientific problem solving", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, pp.1~22 (2021)
  28. Kirschner, F., "Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks : Effects on retention and transfer efficiency", Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), pp.306~314 (2009)
  29. Kollar, I., "Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement", Learning and Instruction, 32, pp.22~36 (2014)
  30. Kuhn, D., "Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument", Thinking & Reasoning, 13(2), pp.90~104 (2007)
  31. Laru, J., "Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context", The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), pp.29~38 (2011)
  32. Litman, C., "Argumentation tasks in secondary English language arts, history, and science : Variations in instructional focus and inquiry space", Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), pp.107~126 (2018)
  33. McNeese, M. D., "Socio-cognitive factors in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge", Cognition, Technology & Work, 2(3), pp.164~177 (2000)
  34. Muhid, A., "The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students' reading comprehension achievement", International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), pp.847~862 (2020)
  35. Noroozi, O., "Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning(ABCSCL) : A synthesis of 15 years of research", Educational Research Review, 7(2), pp.79~106 (2012)
  36. Nussbaum, E. M., "Using argumentation vee diagrams(AVDs)for promoting argument-counterargument integration in reflective writing", Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), pp.549~565 (2008)
  37. Nussbaum, E. M., "Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling : Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education", Educational Psychologist, 46(2), pp.84~106 (2011)
  38. O'Neil Jr, H. F., "Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory : Potential for alternative assessment", Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), pp.234~245 (1996)
  39. Panadero, E., "Socially shared regulation of learning : A review", European Psychologist, 20(3), pp.190~203 (2015)
  40. Puhl, T., "Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation", Computers in Human Behavior, 53, pp.605~616 (2015)
  41. Shehab, H. M., "Cognitive load of critical thinking strategies", Learning and Instruction, 35, pp.51~61 (2015)
  42. Siegel, H., "Why should educators care about argumentation?", Informal Logic, 17(2), pp.159~176 (1995)
  43. Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics" (2012), Pearson
  44. Teng, F., "The effects of task-induced involvement load on word learning and confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition", Educational Sciences : Theory & Practice, 17, pp.791~808 (2017)
  45. Toulmin, S. E., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
  46. Tsovaltzi, D., "Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook : How does CSCL compare to social networking sites?", Computers in Human Behavior, 53, pp.577~592 (2015)
  47. Tsovaltzi, D., "Leveraging social networking sites for knowledge co-construction : Positive effects of argumentation structure, but premature knowledge consolidation after individual preparation", Learning and Instruction, 52, pp.161~179 (2017)
  48. Valero Haro, A., "First-and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: A systematic review", Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), pp.329~345 (2019)
  49. Van De Bogart, K. L., "Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting of electric circuits", Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), pp.1~19 (2017)
  50. Van Eemeren, F. H., "Fundamentals of argumentation theory : A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" (1996), Erlbaum
  51. Vogel, F., "Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning : The role of transactivity", Instructional Science, 44(5), pp.477~500 (2016)
  52. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  53. Walton, D. N., "Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  54. Walton, D. N., "Fundamentals of critical argumentation : Critical reasoning and argumentation" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  55. Weinberger, A., "Computer supported collaborative learning: The next 10 years!", pp.717~726 (2005), Erlbaum
  56. Wood, D., "The role of tutoring in problem solving", Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), pp.89~100 (1976)
  57. Yang, W. T., "The effects of prior-knowledge and online learning approaches on students’ inquiry and argumentation abilities", International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), pp.1564~1589 (2015)
  58. Young, A. E., "Comparing metacognition assessments of mathematics in academically talented students", Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(3), pp.259~275 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Effects of Critical Thinking Strategies on Knowledge Acquisition, Learning Outcome and Student Satisfaction in Web-based Argumentation방선희한국교육공학회 · Educational Technology International2012 · 제13권 제1호Collaboration Scripts for Argumentation Based on Activity Theory권성호, 김동식, 김효숙한국교육공학회 · Educational Technology International2012 · 제13권 제1호CSCL에서 협력적 논증 스캐폴드가 지식공유와 개인의 지식 습득에 미치는 영향김동식, 방선희한국교육공학회 · 교육공학연구2010 · 제26권 제2호웹기반 토론학습에서 스캐폴딩의 유형에 따른 학습자 간 상호작용과 토론 글의 질의 차이이광재, 이영주한국교육정보미디어학회 · 교육정보미디어연구2015 · 제21권 제3호블렌디드 협력학습에서 스캐폴딩, 메타인지 및 협력성향이 협력부하와 지식공유에 미치는 효과김회수, 이순덕한국교육정보미디어학회 · 교육정보미디어연구2016 · 제22권 제4호블렌디드 협력학습에서 스캐폴딩, 메타인지 및 협력성향이 문제해결에 미치는 효과김회수, 이순덕한국교육정보미디어학회 · 교육정보미디어연구2017 · 제23권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Effects of University Students’ Social and Teaching Presence on Learning Engagement and Perceived Learning Achievement in Online Courses오선아, 윤현숙, 김선, 윤헌철pp. 111-137The Mediating Effect of Self-Regulatory Skills on the Relationship between Mothers’ Parenting Attitude and School Adjustment이수연, 이수영pp. 139-167Seven Facets of Learning Agility in Higher Education for Future Society성은모pp. 169-197Perception of University Instructors for Designing Online Interactions: Findings from Importance-Performance Analysis김세영, 임유진, 조미경, 임지영pp. 199-225Analyses of the Structural Relationships between College Students’ Perceived Game Realism, Flow and Learning Satisfaction in Game-Based Learning임걸, 허정은pp. 227-253
원문 보기