Effects of Critical Thinking Strategies on Knowledge Acquisition, Learning Outcome and Student Satisfaction in Web-based Argumentation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of Critical Thinking Strategy supporting argumentation activities between learners. The research question is whether the form of Critical Thinking Strategy offered to support meaningful interaction of collaborative argumentation between learners influences the knowledge acquisition, learning outcome, and student satisfaction. For this, the collaboration outcome of the group, the level of individual knowledge acquisition, the level of students satisfaction were measured as outcome of argumentation activity and their differences analyzed. This study concludes the following: A comparison of the group that was provided with Critical Thinking Strategy (test group) and the group provided with general argumentation scaffolds (compared group) showed there wasn’t statistically significant differences in the quality of the learning outcome of collaboration between the groups and in students satisfaction. But there was significant difference in the degree of individual acquisition depending on the offering of scaffolding for Critical Thinking. Therefore, as premised in this study, supporting meaningful mutual interaction between learners during collaborative argumentation using Critical Thinking Strategy has a positive influence on the individual acquisition of domain knowledge. The group provided with scaffolding for Critical Thinking gained higher effect in the degree of knowledge sharing and individual acquisition of domain knowledge compared to the group provided with general argumentation scaffolding.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of Critical Thinking Strategy supporting argumentation activities between learners. The research question is whether the form of Critical Thinking Strategy offered to support meaningful interaction of collaborative argumentation between learners influences the knowledge acquisition, learning outcome, and student satisfaction. For this, the collaboration outcome of the group, the level of individual knowledge acquisition, the level of students satisfaction were measured as outcome of argumentation activity and their differences analyzed. This study concludes the following: A comparison of the group that was provided with Critical Thinking Strategy (test group) and the group provided with general argumentation scaffolds (compared group) showed there wasn’t statistically significant differences in the quality of the learning outcome of collaboration between the groups and in students satisfaction. But there was significant difference in the degree of individual acquisition depending on the offering of scaffolding for Critical Thinking. Therefore, as premised in this study, supporting meaningful mutual interaction between learners during collaborative argumentation using Critical Thinking Strategy has a positive influence on the individual acquisition of domain knowledge. The group provided with scaffolding for Critical Thinking gained higher effect in the degree of knowledge sharing and individual acquisition of domain knowledge compared to the group provided with general argumentation scaffolding.
참고문헌 (33)
- Andriessen, J, "Arguing to Learn, In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Science", pp.443~459 (2006), cambridge university press
- Andriessen, J, "Argumentation, Computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computersupported collaborative learning environments", pp.27~46 (2003), Kluwer Academic
- Andriessen, J., "Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments", pp.79~115 (2003), Kluwer Academic
- Baker, M. J, "Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the coelaboration of scientific notion, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments", pp.47~78 (2003), Kluwer Academic
- Research on knowledge elaboration in dialogues. In Synthese pour l'habilitation a diriger les recherches, "Baker, M. J", Universite Nancy, 2~ (2004)
- Bauer, Otto F., "Fundamental of Debate: Theory and Practice" (1999), Rockbrook Press
- Bhang, S. H, "Effects of scaffolds for collaborative argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning", 박사, pp.2009
- Bransford, J. D, "How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school" (1999), National Academy Press
- Chi, M. T, "Self- Explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems", Cognitive Science, 13(2), pp.145~182 (1989)
- Chinn, C. A, "Learning to Argue, In Collaborative learning, resoning and technology", pp.355~383 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- de Vries, E, "Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicle for understanding scientific notions", Journal of learning sciences, 11(1), pp.63~103 (2002)
- Dewey, J, "How We Think" (1933), The great Books foundations
- Dillenbourg, P, "Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions, In Barriers and Biases in Computer- Mediated Knowledge Communication" (2005), Springer
- Felton, M, "The development of argumentive discourse skill", Discouse processes, 32(2&3), pp.135~153 (2001)
- Hwang, H. S, "The Effects of Embedding Approach for the improvement of Critical Thinking ability", Koean Jounal of Educational Research, 39(3), pp.187~214 (2001)
- Jermann, P, "Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script, In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborativ e learning environments", pp.205~226 (2003), Kluwer Academic
- Development of thinking skills test (I), "Korean Educational Development Institute", ~, pp.Report Number: 2001-6 (2001)
- Koschmann, T, "CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry: argumentation is learning, In Arguing to Learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments", pp.259~265 (2003), Kluwer
- Kuhn, D, "Effect of dyadic interation on argumentative reasoning", Cognition and Instruction, 15, pp.287~315 (1997)
- Kuhn, D, "The development of argument skills", Child Development, 74(5), pp.1245~1260 (2003)
- Mcpeck, J. E, "Critical Thinking and Education" (1984), Palgrave Macmillan
- Munneke, L, "Arguing to learn; Supporting interactive argumentation through Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning", 박사, pp.2007
- Munneke, L., "Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem", Computers in Human Behavior, 23, pp.1072~1088 (2007)
- Nussbaum, E. M., "Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions", Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, pp.479~500 (2007)
- Oh, S, "The effects of constraint based argumentation scaffolding and epistemological beliefs on ill structured diagnosis-solution problem solving", 박사, pp.2004
- Rummel, N, "Learning to Collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings", Journal of learning science, 14(2), pp.201~241 (2005)
- Simon, S., "Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the Science Classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), pp.235~260 (2006)
- Schwarz, B. B, "Construction of collaborative and individual knowledge in argumentative activity", The journal of the learning science, 12, pp.219~256 (2003)
- Critical Thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. (“The DelphiReport”), "The American Philosophical Association", ~, pp.ERIC Document Reproductive Service Numbers: ED 315-423 (1990)
- Toulmin, S, "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- van Arnelsvoort, M, "Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams", Journal of the Learning Siences, 16(4), pp.485~521 (2007)
- van Drie, J, "Historical reasoning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment, In Collaborative Learning Reasoning, and Technology", pp.265~296 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Weinberger,A, "Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning" (2007), Springer