Collaboration Scripts for Argumentation Based on Activity Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop collaboration scripts as an instructional means to facilitate argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning, and to analyze their effects. To develop collaboration scripts for argumentation, researchers used activity theory as a conceptual framework and refined the design principles by design-based research. Using LAMS, collaboration scripts for argumentation were developed based on the ArgueGraph. To examine their effects, 72 participants were divided into two groups by internal scripts and randomly allocated to one of three external scripts. Applying mixed methods, researchers analyzed argumentation competence related to the cognitive aspect, examined self-efficacy related to the motivational aspect, and identified the factors influencing collaborative learning processes and outcomes. Researchers found that the internal script is a critical factor to determine the dimensions, degrees, and duration of improvement in argumentation competence. That is, learners with higher internal scripts improved highly in the quality of single arguments, while learners with lower internal scripts improved continuously in the quality of argumentation sequences. The effects of the external scripts varied with the internal script levels and supporting periods. Besides, collaboration scripts for argumentation had positive effects on learners’ selfefficacy, and learners with higher internal scripts had better self-efficacy. The factors influencing collaborative learning processes and outcomes showed different results depending on the learning context. Therefore, when scripting learner’s interaction in CSCL, researchers should design the scripts adaptable to a natural context of activities.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop collaboration scripts as an instructional means to facilitate argumentation in computer-supported collaborative learning, and to analyze their effects. To develop collaboration scripts for argumentation, researchers used activity theory as a conceptual framework and refined the design principles by design-based research. Using LAMS, collaboration scripts for argumentation were developed based on the ArgueGraph. To examine their effects, 72 participants were divided into two groups by internal scripts and randomly allocated to one of three external scripts. Applying mixed methods, researchers analyzed argumentation competence related to the cognitive aspect, examined self-efficacy related to the motivational aspect, and identified the factors influencing collaborative learning processes and outcomes. Researchers found that the internal script is a critical factor to determine the dimensions, degrees, and duration of improvement in argumentation competence. That is, learners with higher internal scripts improved highly in the quality of single arguments, while learners with lower internal scripts improved continuously in the quality of argumentation sequences. The effects of the external scripts varied with the internal script levels and supporting periods. Besides, collaboration scripts for argumentation had positive effects on learners’ selfefficacy, and learners with higher internal scripts had better self-efficacy. The factors influencing collaborative learning processes and outcomes showed different results depending on the learning context. Therefore, when scripting learner’s interaction in CSCL, researchers should design the scripts adaptable to a natural context of activities.
참고문헌 (40)
- Arvaja, M., "Analyzing the contextual nature, In Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues", pp.25~46 (2011), Springer
- Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change", Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977)
- Bandura, A., "Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.87~99 (2003)
- Beers, P. J., "Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments", Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), pp.623~643 (2005)
- Carmien, S., "The interplay of internal and external scripts: A distributed cognition perspective, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives", pp.303~326 (2007), Springer
- Dillenbourg, P., "The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), pp.5~23 (2008)
- Dillenbourg, P., "Designing integrative scripts, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives", pp.275~301 (2007), Springer
- Dillenbourg, P., "Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), pp.1~13 (2007)
- Engeström, Y., "Expansive learning at work : Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization", Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), pp.133~156 (2001)
- Fischer, F., "Perspectives on collaboration scripts, In Scripting computersupported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives", pp.1~10 (2007), Springer
- Haake, J. M., "Scripting a distance-learning university course: Do students benefit from net-based scripted collaboration?", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), pp.191~210 (2010)
- Haake, J. M., "Flexible scripting in net-based learning groups, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives", pp.155~175 (2007), Springer
- 김효숙, "연구방법론을 중심으로 한 기독교교육 연구 분석 및 대안 모색", 기독교교육 논총, 29(29), pp.347~377 (2012), 한국기독교교육학회
- Kim, D. S., "An investigation on the use of web based multi-user object oriented learning environment in education", Journal of Education Information and Broadcasting, 6(2), pp.27~44 (2000)
- 김효숙, "CSCL에서 내재적 논증 수준과 외현적 스크립트 제시전략이 논증 능력에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 25(2), pp.247~270 (2009), 한국교육공학회
- King, A., "Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives" (2007), Springer
- Kirschner, P. A., "Cognitive tools and mindtools for collaborative learning", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), pp.199~209 (2006)
- Kobbe, L., "Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), pp.211~224 (2007)
- Kollar, I., "Collaboration scripts: A conceptual analysis", Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), pp.159~185 (2006)
- Kwon, S. J., "Effects of Computer Supported Collaboration Scripts for Building Collaborative Knowledge in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment", 박사, Department of Educational Technology, pp.2008
- Lee, S. H., "The Effects of Collaborative Reflection-Supporting Tools in Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning Environments", 박사, Department of Educational Technology, pp.2003
- Ludvigsen, S., "Computer-supported collaborative learning: Pedagogical and technological scaffolding, In Int'l Encyclopedia of Education's: Learning and cognition" (2007), Elsevier
- Munneke, L., "Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem", Computer in Human Behavior, 23(3), pp.1072~1088 (2007)
- Nardi, B. A., "Activity theory and human-computer interaction, In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction", pp.7~16 (1996), MIT Press
- Nardi, B. A., "Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition, In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction", pp.69~102 (1996), MIT Press
- Nussbaum, E. M., "Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning : Preface and literature review", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), pp.345~359 (2008)
- 오동건, "컴퓨터 지원 협력학습을 위한 조정지원도구의 개발 및 효과성 분석", 기업교육연구, 10(1), pp.65~95 (2008), 한국기업교육학회
- Pang, S. H., "Effects of Scaffolds for Collaborative Argumentation in Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning", 박사, Department of Educational Technology, pp.2009
- Schellens T., "Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), pp.225~246 (2007)
- Schunk, D. H., "Self-efficacy and academic motivation", Educational Psychologist, 26, pp.207~231 (1991)
- Schwarz, B. B., "Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), pp.219~256 (2003)
- Stegmann, K., "The myth of overscripting: Can novices be supported too much?", Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings, 1, pp.406~413 (2011), International Society of the Learning Sciences
- Stegmann, K., "Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), pp.421~447 (2007)
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes" (2000), Yangseowon
- Wecker. C., "Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of distributed monitoring", Mice, Minds and Society: CSCL conference 2007, (8), pp.763~771 (2007), SUNJ
- Weinberger, A., "A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning", Computers and Education, 46(1), pp.71~95 (2006), Elsevier
- Weinberger, A., "Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives", pp.191~211 (2007), Springer
- Yamagata-Lynch, L., "Using Activity Theory for the Sociocultural Case Analyses of a Teacher Professional Development Program Involving Technology Integration", 박사, pp.2001
- 양일호, "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.203~220 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- Zurita, G., "A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL", British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), pp.211~235 (2007)