본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국에서의 성장과 빈곤, 불평등

Economic Growth, Poverty and Inequality in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

본 연구는 한국에서 경제성장이 저소득층의 소득을 개선하는지를 평가하기 위해 성장탄력성을 앳킨슨의 일반평균(general means) 개념에 기초한 방법으로 추정하였다. 성장탄력성은 경제의 평균소득 1% 증가가 저소득층 소득을 몇 %를 높이는가를 나타낸다. 기존 성장탄력성 추정 방법론이 가지는 소득 구분 기준의 자의성 문제를 넘어서기 위해 Foster and Székely(2008)에서 처음 시도된 일반평균 기반의 성장탄력성 추정 방법론을 적용했다. 분석 결과, 우리나라의 경우, 저소득층 소득이 단기적으로는 경기 변동에 탄력적으로 반응하지만, 경제성장의 효과는 오래 지속되지 않아, 장기적으로는 경제성장(평균소득증가)에 미치지 못하는 소득 수준으로 수렴하는 것으로 나타났다. 경제성장이 일시적으로는 저소득층의 소득을 높이지만 장기적으로는 더 낮은 소득 수준으로 회귀한다는 것이다. 통제변수 분석에서는, 고용률을 높이는 것이 저소득층 소득 개선에 가장 효과적이었고, 임시일용직 비율은 유의도는 낮았지만 부정적이었으며, 무역의존도 심화도 부정적이었다. 이는 성장 중심 정책에서도 분배적 고려가 필요하고, 저소득층 소득 개선에는 양질의 고용 기회 제공이 중요하다는 점을 시사한다.

Abstract

This study estimates growth elasticities based on the concept of general means of Atkinson(1970) to evaluate how much economic growth enhance income of lower-income group in Korea. The growth elasticity is the % increase of income of lower-income group following 1% increase of average income in the population. Like Foster and Székely(2008), we introduce the method of estimating growth elasticity based on general mean concept to overcome the arbitrariness of income standards used in previous studies. This is to give more weights to lower income groups. The result is that the income of lower-income group converges to lower level than the average income in the long-run although it responds more rapidly to changes of average income in the short-run. While their income more grows faster than the average income in the short-run, it regresses to lower level of income in the long-run. The employment rate is more effective in raising the income of lower-income group, while the ratio of foreign trade to national income is less effective. These imply that re-distribution should be considered even in growth policies, and creating good job opportunities to lower-income groups is very important.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 김준영, "경기변동의 소득 및 소비불평등 파급효과- 도시근로자 가구를 중심으로 -", 재정논집, 18(2), pp.3~22 (2004), 한국재정학회
  2. 안종범, "景氣變動과 分配 및 貧困間 動態的 關係", 경제학연구, 54(4), pp.5~31 (2006), 한국경제학회
  3. 여유진, "주요 OECD 국가의 빈곤율과 경제성장, 사회지출 간의 관계", 국제사회보장동향, pp.31~39 (2006), 한국보건사회연구원
  4. 유경준, "성장과 분배 및 빈곤의 관계 연구", KDI Journal of Economic Policy, 28(2), pp.199~237 (2006), 한국개발연구원
  5. 이병희, "근로빈곤의 노동시장 요인과 빈곤 동학", 경제발전연구, 16(1), pp.93~116 (2010), 한국경제발전학회
  6. 이병희, 정재호, "경제위기 이후의 빈곤구조 분석-반복빈곤 및 고용과의 관계를중심으로", 동향과 전망, (52), pp.128~150 (2002), 한국사회과학연구회
  7. Adams, Richard Jr., "Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Estimating the Growth Elasticity of Poverty", World Development, 32(12), pp.1989~2014 (2004)
  8. Adelman, Irma, "Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries" (1973), Stanford University Press
  9. Ahluwalia, M. S., "Income distribution and development: Some stylized facts", The American Economic Review, 66(2), pp.128~135 (1976)
  10. Asteriou, D., "Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  11. Atkinson, A. B., "On the measurement of inequality", Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), pp.244~263 (1970)
  12. Can Pro-growth Policies Lift all Boats?: An Analysis Based on Household Disposable Income, "Causa, O.", OECD Economics Department, ~, pp.OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1180 (2015)
  13. Structural Reforms and Income Distribution, "Causa, O.", OECD Economic Policy, ~, pp.OECD Economic Policy Paper, 2015-13 (2015)
  14. Christiaensen, Luc., "Africa's Growth, Poverty, Inequality Nexus - Fostering Shared Prosperity", World Bank Draft, ~ (2013)
  15. Clements, M. P., "Seasonally cointegration and forecasting UK residential energy demand", Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46(2), pp.185~206 (1999)
  16. Davidson, R., "Testing for consistency using artificial regressions", Econometric Theory, 5, pp.363~384 (1989)
  17. De Janvry, Alain., "Growth, Poverty and Inequality in Latin America: A Causal Analysis, 1970–94", Review of Income and Wealth, 46, pp.267~287 (2000)
  18. Dollar, David, "Growth Is Good for the Poor", Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), pp.195~225 (2002)
  19. Growth Still is Good for the Poor, "Dollar, D.", The World Bank, ~, pp.Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6568 (2013)
  20. A Unified Approach to Measuring Poverty and Inequality: Theory and Practice, "Foster, J. E.", The World Bank, ~ (2013)
  21. Foster, E. James., "Is Economic Growth Good For The Poor? Tracking Low Incomes Using General Means", International Economic Review, 49(4), pp.1143~1172 (2008)
  22. Gallup, J. L., "Geography and economic development", International Regional Science Review, 22(2), pp.179~232 (1999)
  23. Ghatak S., "The use of the ARDL approach in estimating virtual exchange rates in India", Journal of Applied Statistics, 28, pp.573~583 (2001)
  24. Kraay, A., "Measurement Error, Aggregate Growth and the Distribution-Corrected Mean: A Comment on Foster and Székely", The World Bank, ~ (2001)
  25. Kraay, A., "Distributional Impacts of Aggregate Gorwth When Individual Incomes Are Measured with Error", The World Bank, ~ (2001)
  26. Islam, T. M. Tonmoy, "Estimating the Elasticity of Growth in the US Using the Generalized Means of Income", Social Indicators Research, pp.1~18 (2015)
  27. Islam, T. M. T., "On persistent poverty in a rich country", Southern Economic Journal, 81(3), pp.653~678 (2015)
  28. Loayza, Norman V., "The composition of growth matters for poverty alleviation", Journal of Development Economics, 93(1), pp.137~151 (2010)
  29. Tracking pro poor growth, "McCulloch, N.", Institute of Development Studies, ~ (2000)
  30. Pesaran, M. H., "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, pp.289~226 (2001)
  31. Ravallion, M., "What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distribution and poverty?", The World Bank Economic Review, 11(2), pp.357~382 (1997)
  32. Ram, Rati., "Income elasticity of poverty in developing countries: updated estimates from new data", Applied Economics Letters, 20, pp.554~558 (2013)
  33. Does Economic Growth Reduce Poverty?, "Roemer, M.", HIID, ~, pp.CAER II Discussion Paper No. 4 (1997)
  34. Smolensky, E., "Growth, Inequality and Poverty: A Cautionary Note", Review of Income and Wealth, 40, pp.217~222 (1994)
  35. How Well Do the Poor Connect to the Growth Process?, "Timmer, P.", HIID, 1997~, pp.CAER II Discussion Paper No. 17 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)