Labour Market Risk Shifts in 18 Post-industrial Economies: An Application of Fuzzy-set Ideal Type Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The discussion of “new risks” in the field of social policy started to gain attention in the late 1990s and it is commonly argued that new risks are provoked by deindustrialization and/or globalization being more concentrated among the young, women and low skilled individuals. This study commences its inquiry with a conceptualization of labour market risk in an attempt to critically rethink the argument of new risk. A reevaluation of the concept is followed by an empirical investigation on the different types of risks and their changes by different degree. Eight-teen countries are selected in order to provide a comparative account to understand new risk. These are comparatively analyzed using the fuzzy-set ideal type approach to discover different types of social risks and to measure degrees of changes in relation to social risk. In sum, this paper aims to answer: what is new risk? and how do the characteristic of labour market risks differ in different post-industrial countries? The findings suggest that the types of risk are diverse and the speed or the directions of shift are also diverse.
Abstract
The discussion of “new risks” in the field of social policy started to gain attention in the late 1990s and it is commonly argued that new risks are provoked by deindustrialization and/or globalization being more concentrated among the young, women and low skilled individuals. This study commences its inquiry with a conceptualization of labour market risk in an attempt to critically rethink the argument of new risk. A reevaluation of the concept is followed by an empirical investigation on the different types of risks and their changes by different degree. Eight-teen countries are selected in order to provide a comparative account to understand new risk. These are comparatively analyzed using the fuzzy-set ideal type approach to discover different types of social risks and to measure degrees of changes in relation to social risk. In sum, this paper aims to answer: what is new risk? and how do the characteristic of labour market risks differ in different post-industrial countries? The findings suggest that the types of risk are diverse and the speed or the directions of shift are also diverse.
참고문헌 (32)
- Barrow, C. J., "Social impact assessment : an introduction" (2000), Arnold
- Beck, U., "Risk society : Towards a new modernity" (1992), Sage
- Blank, R., "Working and poor: How economic and policy changes are affecting low-wage workers" (2006), Russell Sage Foundation
- Bonoli, G., "New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-industrial Social Policies, In The politics of postindustrial welfare states" (2006), Routledge
- Armingeon, K., "Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies", Comparative Political Studies, 40(5), pp.495~520 (2007)
- Dehesa, G., "Unemployment Policy: government options for the labour market" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Esping-Andersen, G., "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" (1990), Polity Press
- Esping-Andersen, G., "Social foundations of postindustrial economies" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Goert, G., "Social science concepts: A user’s guide" (2005), Princeton University Press
- Houseman, S., "Nonstandard Employment in Developed Economies: Causes and Consequences", Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 59(2) (2006)
- Huber, E., "Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment, In The new politics of the welfare state" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Huber, E., "Combating Old and New Social Risks, In The politics of postindustrial welfare states" (2006), Routledge
- World of work report, "ILO", International Labour Office, ~ (2008)
- Iversen, T., "The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion, In The new politics of the welfare state" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Canada’s new social risks: directions for a new social architecture, "Jenson, J.", Canadian Policy Research Network Inc, ~, pp.Report F143 (2004)
- Krugman, P., "Pop internationalism" (1996), MIT Press
- Kvist, J., "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s : using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types" (1999), Longman
- Kvist, J., "Diversity, ideal types and fuzzy sets in comparative welfare state research, In Innovative comparative methods for poli cy analysis: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide", pp.167~184 (2006), Springer
- Latané, B., "The psychology of social impact", American Psychologist, 36, pp.343~356 (1981)
- Lee, BH, "Republic of Korea: from flexibility to segmentation, In Globalization, flexibilization and working conditions in asia and the pacific eds" (2008), International Labour Office
- Lee, S, "Globalization, institutional reforms and workers: changes and outcomes, In Globalization, flexibilization and working conditions in asia and the pacific eds" (2008), International Labour Office
- Mishra, R., "Globalization and the welfare state" (1999), Edward Elgar
- OECD, "Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries" (2008), OECD
- Pierson, P., "Post-Industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare States, In The new politics of the welfare state" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Ragin, C. C., "Fuzzy-set social science" (2000), The University of Chicago Press
- Ragin, C. C., "Redesigning social inquiry : fuzzy set and beyond" (2009), The University of Chicago Press
- Satori, G., "Guidelines of Concept Analysis, In Concepts and methods in social science" (2009), Rouledge
- Sen, A., "Inequality reexamined" (1992), Clarendon Press
- Taylor-Gooby, P., "Risk, Trust and welfare" (2000), Macmillan Press
- Taylor-Gooby, P., "New risks, new welfare: the transformation of the european welfare state" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Townsend, P., "Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living" (1979), Penguin Books
- Vis, B., "States of welfare or states of workfare? Welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985-2002", Policy & Politics, 35(1), pp.105~122 (2007)
