본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기술혁신의 요인과 성과에 관한 메타분석: 우리나라 중소기업에 관한 실증분석 연구를 대상으로

A Meta-analysis on Antecedents and Consequences of Technological Innovation: Focused on Empirical Analyses of South Korea’s SMEs

김민서|박혜수|김주일
한국중소기업학회|2020.06|중소기업연구|제42권 제2호|pp. 43-67|DOI 10.36491/APJSB.42.2.3

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

메타분석경영성과Meta-analysisSMEsfinancial performance중소기업기술혁신technological innovationantecedents혁신요인
주제분류경영학

초록

국내 중소기업의 기술혁신에 대한 연구는 괄목할만한성장을 이루어왔으나 각 연구들은 데이터 부족, 방법론 및 변수의 다양성 등으로 인하여일반화하기 어려운 한계점을 갖는다. 따라서 수많은 실증연구를 통해 일반화된 결론을얻기 위한 체계적이고 종합적인 통계적 분석은 기업의 경영전략과 정부의기술혁신지원정책을 수립하는 데 필수적이다. 본 연구는 중소기업의 기술혁신성과에영향을 미치는 요인, 그리고 기술혁신성과와 경영성과의 관계에 관한 메타분석을 통하여중소기업의 기술혁신 프로세스를 포괄적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 국내 111개의 실증분석연구, 총 62,512개 표본에 대한 메타분석을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중소기업의기술혁신성과를 위해서는 내부 기술협력, 혁신문화, 동적역량, 흡수역량 등이 중요한요인이었다. 둘째, 기술혁신성과의 대리변수로 도입된 지식재산권 성과에 대해서는인사역량, 기술적 기회, 사업화 역량, 여유 자원, R&D 자금투입 등이 중요한 요인으로나타났다. 셋째, 기술혁신성과는 경영성과에 중간 크기 이상의 영향을 미치나, 지식재산권성과의 영향은 작은 효과크기로 나타났다. 넷째, 기술혁신성과와 경영성과의 관계에서경영성과의 측정방법, 출간유형은 통계적으로 유의한 조절효과를 나타내는 변수였으나, 지식재산권 성과와 경영성과의 관계에서는 유의한 조절변수를 발견할 수 없었다.

Abstract

Studies on technological innovation of SMEs have made remarkable growth both qualitatively and quantitatively, but each study has a limitation to generalize due to lack of data, diversity of methodologies and variables. Therefore, a systematic and comprehensive statistical approach to obtain generalized conclusions through numerous empirical studies can help both the strategic decision making of SMEs and the government's innovation policies. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively analyze the technological innovation process of SMEs through meta-analysis. For this, the antecedents of technological innovation, the relationship between technological innovation and management performance of SMEs were analyzed. The results of using 62,512 samples from 111 domestic empirical studies were as follows; First, to improve the technological innovation of SMEs, internal cooperation, innovation culture, dynamic capabilities, and absorptive capacity were important antecedents. Second, in terms of IP performance, which was introduced as a proxy for technological innovation, human resource management, technological opportunities, commercialization capabilities, financial resources, and R&D expenditure. Third, technological innovation has a medium-sized effect on financial performance, however the effect of IP performance has a small effect size. Lastly, in the relationship between technological innovation and financial performance, the method of measurement and publication type showed statistically significant moderating effects.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 중소기업 제품의 판로확대 방안 연구, "대한상공회의소", ~ (2014)
  2. 중소기업중앙회, "2018년 중소기업 위상지표", ~ (2018)
  3. 황정규, "메타분석의 이론과 방법론", 성곡논총, 19, pp.1~55 (1988)
  4. Baumol, W., "The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism" (2002), Princeton University Press
  5. Becheikh, N., "Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector : A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003", Technovation, 26(5-6), pp.644~664 (2006)
  6. Borenstein, M., "Introduction to Meta-Analysis" (2009), John Wiley & Sons
  7. Bowen, F. E., "Timing is Everything : A Meta-analysis of the Relationships between Organizational Performance and Innovation", Journal of Business Research, 63(11), pp.1179~1185 (2010)
  8. Büschgens, T., "Organizational Culture and Innovation : A Meta-Analytic Review", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), pp.763~781 (2013)
  9. Chen, S., "The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: A Literature Review", Advances in Computer Science Research (7th International Conference on Social Network, Communication and Education), 82, pp.648~652 (2017)
  10. Cho, H. J., "Relationship between Innovativeness, Quality, Growth, Profitability, and Market Value", Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), pp.555~575 (2005)
  11. Cohen, J., "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  12. Cooper, H., "Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach" (2010), SAGE Publications
  13. Damanpour, F., "Organizational Innovation:A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators", Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.555~590 (1991)
  14. Dziallas, M., "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process : An extensive literature analysis", Technovation, 80, pp.3~29 (2019)
  15. Evanschitzky, H., "Success Factors of Product Innovation: An Updated MetaAnalysis", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), pp.21~37 (2012)
  16. Feldman, J. M., "Beyond Attribution Theory : Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), pp.127~148 (1981)
  17. Fisher, R. A., "Statistical Methods for Research Workers" (1932), Oliver and Boyd
  18. Glass, G. V., "Primary, Secondary, and Meta-analysis of Research", Educational Researcher, 5(1), pp.3~8 (1976)
  19. Hedges, L. V., "Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis" (1985), Academic Press
  20. Henard, D. H., "Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others", Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), pp.362~375 (2001)
  21. Hua, S. Y., "Product Change Intensity, Product Advantage, and Market Performance : An Empirical Investigation of the PC Industry", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), pp.316~329 (2006)
  22. Hultink, E. J., "The Effect of Sales Force Adoption on New Product Selling Performance", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(8), pp.435~450 (2000)
  23. Hunter, J. E., "Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Finding" (2004), SAGE Publications
  24. Kaplan, R. S., "The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action" (1996), Harvard Business School Press
  25. Kaplan, R. S., "The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment" (2001), Harvard Business School Press
  26. Kim, M., "A Meta-analysis Comparing Factors Affecting the Growth of SMEs : The Case of Germany and South Korea", Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 78(12), pp.852~857 (2019)
  27. Knott, A. M., "Reconciling the Firm Size and Innovation Puzzle", Organization Science, 31(2)[DOI]
  28. Li, J., "A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Service Innovation and Firm Performance", 6th International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2019), 84, pp.256~261 (2019), Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
  29. Antecedents and Consequences of Product Innovation:A Meta-analytic Review, "Mandal, S.", Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, ~ (2016)
  30. Mendoza, M. L., "Innovation Across Types of Organization : A Meta-analysis", Suma de Negocios, 6(13), pp.108~113 (2015)
  31. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., "Determinants of New Product Performance : A Review and MetaAnalysis", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), pp.397~417 (1994)
  32. Mueller, V., "Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation : A MetaAnalysis of the Influence of Institutional Factors", Journal of Management, 39(6), pp.1606~1636 (2013)
  33. Neely, A., "The Judge Institute of Management Studies" (1998), University of Cambridge
  34. Neely, A., "A Framework for Analysing Business Performance, Firm Innovation and Related Contextual Factors : Perceptions of Managers and Policy Makers in Two European Regions", Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), pp.114~124 (2001)
  35. Pattikawa, L. H., "Understanding New Product Project Performance", European Journal of Marketing, 40(11, pp.12) (2006), 1178~1193
  36. Pearson, K., "On a New Method of Determining"Goodness of Fit", Biometrika, 26(4), pp.425~442 (1934)
  37. Peterson, R. A., "On the Use of Beta Coefficients in MetaAnalysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), pp.175~181 (2005)
  38. Innovation Measurement: A Decision Framework to Determine Innovativeness of a Company, "Phan, K.", Portland State University, ~, pp.Dissertations and Theses, Paper 1017 (2013)
  39. Prajogo, D. I., "The Relationship between Innovation and Business Performance : A Comparative Study between Manufacturing and Service Firms", Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), pp.218~225 (2006)
  40. Price, R. M., "Technology and Strategic Advantage", California Management Review, 38(3), pp.38~56 (1996)
  41. Ram, S., "Forced”Adoption of Innovation in Organizations:Consequences and Implications", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), pp.117~126 (1991)
  42. Roberts, P. W., "Product Innovation, Product-market Competition and Persistent Profitability in the US Pharmaceutical Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), pp.655~670 (1999)
  43. Rosenbusch, N., "Is Innovation Always Beneficial? A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Innovation and Performance in SMEs", Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), pp.441~457 (2011)
  44. Salavou, H., "Profitability in MarketOriented SMEs : Does Product Innovation Matter?", European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), pp.164~171 (2002)
  45. Sarooghi, H., "Examining the Relationship between Creativity and Innovation : A Meta-analysis of Organizational, Cultural, and Environmental Factors", Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), pp.714~731 (2015)
  46. Song, M., "Success Factors in New Ventures : A Metaanalysis", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(1), pp.7~27 (2008)
  47. Souitaris, V., "The International Handbook on Innovation", pp.514~529 (2003), Elsevier Science
  48. Stanley, T. D., "What from Chaff : Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), pp.131~150 (2001)
  49. Storey, C., "Success Factors for Service Innovation : A Meta-Analysis", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(5), pp.527~548 (2015)
  50. Van Looy, A., "Business Process Performance Measurement:A Structured Literature Review of Indicators, Measures and Metrics", Springer Plus, 5, pp.1797~ (2016)
  51. Does Innovation Mediate Firm Performance? : A MetaAnalysis of Determinants and Consequences of Organizational Innovation, "Vincent, L. H.", Georgia Institute of Technology, ~, pp.TI:GER Student Working Papers, 6 (2004)
  52. Wolf, F. M., "Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis" (1986), SAGE Publications
  53. Zou, T., "The Capacity to Innovate : A Meta-analysis of Absorptive Capacity", Innovation : Organization & Management, 20(2), pp.87~121 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

중소기업의 기술혁신 결정요인에 관한 실증연구신진교, 임재현, 황수정한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2009 · 제16권 제4호중소기업에 대한 정부의 기술혁신지원정책은 다른 정책수단보다 효과적인가?: 메타분석을 통한 효과성 비교김주일, 원이중, 정근주국회예산정책처 · 예산정책연구2024 · 제13권 제3호중소기업과 기술혁신:「중소기업연구」40년 연구동향 및 향후 연구과제강신형, 김선영, 박상문한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2020 · 제42권 제4호중소기업의 R&D와 기술혁신: 전략 및 조직문화의 역할신진교한국산업경영학회 · 경영연구2007 · 제22권 제2호중소기업의 혁신투자 및 기술개발역량과 기술협력역량이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향: 기업성장단계의 조절효과김정호, 박현성한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2022 · 제40권 제2호기술혁신과 기업성과와의 관계에서 흡수역량과 조직문화의 조절효과 연구김영준, 신왕재, 황보윤한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2024 · 제19권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

원칙중심의 국제회계기준 도입이 중소-중견기업의 재무보고에 미친 영향에 관한 연구김응길, 한승수pp. 1-22워크아웃 중소기업의 성공과 실패 요인김순철, 김문겸, 이병호pp. 23-42우리나라 가족기업의 연구동향과 과제남영호pp. 69-92정부출연연구원의 중소기업 기술지원 성과에 관한 연구: 협력과 수요대응지원제도를 중심으로정규채, 정양헌, 김필성, 윤상필, 고혜수pp. 93-115제조혁신 촉진을 위한 스마트공장 정책방안박재성, 강재원pp. 117-137
원문 보기