본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신약의 구약 사용과 구약의 구약 사용:마태복음 2:15절의 성경 내적 주해 (Inner-Biblical Exegesis) 방법론에 따른 해석학적 접근

The Use of the Old Testament in the New and the Use of the Old Testament in the Old: A Hermeneutical Study of Matthew 2:15

정우진
한국복음주의신학회 (Korea Evangelical Theological Society)|2019.10|성경과 신학 (Bible and Theology)|제92권 |pp. 95-122|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17156/BT.92.04

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

해석학HermeneuticsMatthew 2:15신약의 구약 사용호세아11:1마태복음2:15성경 내적 주해출애굽 모티브The Use of the Old Testament in the NewHosea 11:1Inner-Biblical ExegesisExodus Motif
주제분류기독교신학

초록

마태의 구약 사용(Matthew’s Use of the Old Testament)은 그의 급진적인 구약 사용으로 인해 그 해석의 난해함에 있어 악명이 높다. 이 소논문은 이러한 난제를 푸는 해석학적 접근에 그 의의가 있다. 마태의 구약 사용을 분석함으 로써 신약의 구약 사용(The Use of the Old Testament in the New)과 구약의 구약 사용(The Use of the Old Testament in the Old) 간의 해석학적 상관성 및 유사성을 규명하고자 한다. 또한, 성경 내적 주해(Inner-Biblical Exegesis)라는 방법론의 해석학적 전제를 통해 마태의 구약 사용에 나타난 유대적 배경 연 구에 기여하고자 한다. 이러한 방법론적 전제를 가지고 마태의 난해한 구약 인용 중 하나인 호세아 본문(호11:1; 마2:15)을 분석하고자 한다. 이 연구를 통해 구약 안에서 이미 사용되고 창의적으로 재해석된 본문들을 마태가 어 떠한 유사한 해석학적 관점을 가지고 인용하는지 살펴보고자 한다.

Abstract

Matthew’s use of Hos 11:1 has provoked discussion among many biblical scholars. It is natural to observe the ambiguity in Matthew’s use of Hosea, because these two texts refer to two different objectives employing the same announcement, “Out of Egypt I called my son.” In the midst of these exe- getical difficulties, one of the hermeneutical problems in understanding Matthew’s use of Hos 11:1 is that a number of scholars focus on the book of Exodus rather than the book of Hosea. It is important, however, to recog- nize the hermeneutical significance of the Hosean tradition rather than that of the Exodus tradition, since Matthew cites not from the Exodus text but from the Hosean text. This paper argues that Hosea and Matthew share the same hermeneutical method by which they use the earlier redemptive- historical motif as a hermeneutical device to interpret their current historical and theological situations. I will first examine Hos 11:1 in its literary con- text and delve into the hermeneutical significance of Hosea’s use of the Exodus motif. I will also analyze Matt 2:15 in its narrative context and investigate the hermeneutics of Matthew’s use of the Exodus motif. As a result of this study, it will be argued that Hosea and Matthew share the same hermeneutics of inner-biblical exegesis in their use of the Holy Scripture.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. 박경희, "호세아 11장의 은유적 해석 -초기 번역본들 대조를 통한 본문 비평적 연구-", 성경원문연구, (22), pp.73~93 (2008), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
  2. 소기천, "마태복음의 이사야 인용구에 나타난 상호본문성(intertextuality)에 관한 연구", 한국개혁신학, 33, pp.222~248 (2012), 한국개혁신학회
  3. 조재천, "상호본문성을 반영하는 성서 번역 - 히브리서 12:15하의 우리말 번역과 표기를 중심으로 -", 성경원문연구, (39), pp.248~265 (2016), (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소[DOI]
  4. 월튼, 스티브, "복음서와 사도행전" (2007), 성서유니온
  5. Albl, M. C, "Scripture Cannot Be Broken: The Form and Function of the Early Christian Testimonia Collections" (1999), Brill
  6. Andersen, Francis I, "Hosea" (1980), Doubleday
  7. Beale, G. K, "The Right Doctrine from the Wrong Texts?: Essays on the Use of the Old Testament in the New" (1994), Baker
  8. Beaton, Richard, "Isaiah’s Christ in Matthew’s Gospel" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  9. Ben Zvi, Ehud, "Hosea" (2005), Eerdmans
  10. Blomberg, Craig L, "Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament", pp.1~109 (2007), Baker
  11. Boda, Mark J, "Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation", pp.296~298 (2007), Routledge
  12. Brown, Raymond Edward, "The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke" (1993), Doubleday
  13. Burkitt, F. C, "The Gospel History and Its Transmission" (2008), Gorgias
  14. Carmignac, J, "Le Document de Qumran sur Melkisedeq", RevQ, 7, pp.342~378 (1970)
  15. Carson, D. A, "The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Vol. 9", pp.23~670 (2005), Zondervan
  16. Chatman, Seymour, "Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film" (1978), Cornell University Press
  17. Chung, Woojin, "Translation Theory and the Old Testament in Matthew: The Possibilities of Skopos Theory" (2017), Brill
  18. Crowe, Brandon D, "Fulfillment in Matthew as Eschatological Reversal", WTJ, 75, pp.111~127 (2013)
  19. Davies, William David, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Vol. 1" (1988), T. & T. Clark
  20. Dodd, C. H, "According to the Scriptures: The Substructure of New Testament Theology" (1952), Nisbet
  21. Drusius, Johannes, "Parallela sacra", Aegidium Radacum
  22. Duling, Dennis C, "A Marginal Scribe: Studies in the Gospel of Matthew in a Social-Scientific Perspective" (2012), Cascade Books
  23. Edgar, S. L, "Respect for Context in Quotations from the Old Testament", NTS, 9, pp.55~62 (1962)
  24. Ellis, E. Earle, "New Testament Interpretation: Essays on Principles and Methods", pp.199~219 (1977), Eerdmans
  25. Fishbane, Michael A, "Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel" (1985), Clarendon
  26. Fishbane, Michael A, "The Garments of Torah: Essays in Biblical Hermeneutics" (1989), Indiana University Press
  27. Glenny, W. E, "Hosea: A Commentary based on Hosea in Codex Vaticanus" (2013), Brill
  28. Gurtner, Daniel M, "Jesus, Matthew’s Gospel and Early Christianity: Studies in Memory of Graham N. Stanton", pp.23~38 (2011), T. & T. Clark
  29. Harrington, Daniel J, "The Gospel of Matthew" (1991), Liturgical
  30. Harris, J. R, "Testimonies" (1916), Cambridge University Press
  31. Hays, Richard B, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul" (1989), Yale University Press
  32. Howard, Tracy L, "The Use of Hosea 11:1 in Matthew 2:15: An Alternative Solution", BS, 143, pp.314~328 (1986)
  33. Junius, Franciscus, "Sacrorum parallelorum libri tres", Bishop
  34. Kakkanattu, Joy Philip, "God’s Enduring Love in the Book of Hosea: A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis of Hosea 11:1–11" (2006), Mohr Siebeck
  35. Kennedy, Joel, "The Recapitulation of Israel: Use of Israel’s History in Matthew 1:1—4:11" (2008), Mohr Siebeck
  36. Knight, Douglas A, "Rediscovering the Traditions of Israel" (1975), Scholars Press
  37. Knight, "Hosea: Introduction and Commentary" (1960), SCM
  38. Kristeva, Julia, "Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art" (1980), Columbia University Press
  39. Lindars, B, "New Testament Apologetic: The Doctrinal Significance of the Old Testament Quotations" (1961), SCM
  40. Lohmeyer, E, "Das Evangelium des Matthäus: Nachgelassene Ausarbeitungen und Entwürfe zur Übersetzung und Erklärung" (1956), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  41. Longenecker, Richard N, "Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period" (1999), Eerdmans
  42. Luz, Ulrich, "Matthew: A Continental Commentary" (1992), Fortress
  43. McKenzie, Steve, "Exodus Typology in Hosea", ResQ, 22, pp.100~108 (1979)
  44. Mead, R. T, "A Dissenting Opinion about Respect for Context in Old Testament Quotations", NTS, 10, pp.279~289 (1963)
  45. Menken, Maarten J. J, "Matthew’s Bible: The Old Testament Text of the Evangelist" (2004), Peeters
  46. Moyise, Steve, "Paul and Scripture" (2010), Baker Academic
  47. Osborne, Grant R, "The Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament" (2010), Zondervan
  48. Porter, Stanley E, "Hearing the Old Testament in the New Testament", pp.1~8 (2006), Eerdmans
  49. Porter, Stanley E, "The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory and Practice", pp.98~110 (2007), Sheffield Phoenix
  50. Powell, Mark Allan, "What Is Narrative Criticism?" (1990), Fortress
  51. Resseguie, James L, "Narrative Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction" (2005), Baker
  52. Rooker, Mark F, "The Use of the Old Testament in the Book of Hosea", CTR, 7, pp.51~66 (1993)
  53. Senior, Donald, "What Are They Saying About Matthew?" (1983), Paulist
  54. Soares Prabhu, George M, "The Formula Quotations in the Infancy Narrative of Matthew: An Enquiry into the Tradition History of Mt 1–2" (1976), Biblical Institute
  55. Stanley, Christopher D, "Paul and the Language of Scripture: Citation Technique in the Pauline Epistles and Contemporary Literature" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  56. Stanley, Christopher D, "As It is Written: Studying Paul’s Use of Scripture", pp.3~12 (2008), SBL
  57. Stanton, Graham, "Studies in Matthew and Early Christianity", pp.9~75 (2013), Mohr Siebeck
  58. Stendahl, Krister, "The Interpretation of Matthew", pp.56~66 (1983), Fortress
  59. Stendahl, Krister, "The School of St. Matthew: And Its Use of the Old Testament" (1954), Almquist & Wiksells
  60. Strecker, Georg, "Der Weg der Gerechtigkeit: Untersuchung zur Theologie des Matthäus" (1966), Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht
  61. Vaganay, L, "Le problème synoptique: Une hypothèse de travail" (1954), Desclée
  62. Watts, John D. W, "Reading and Hearing the Book of the Twelve", pp.209~217 (2000), SBL
  63. Wolff, Hans Walter, "Hosea: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Hosea" (1974), Fortress
  64. Zunz, Leopold, "Die gottesdientlichen Vorträge der Juden historisch entwickelt:ein Beitrag zur Alterthumskunde und biblischen Kritik, zur Literatur- und Religionsgeschichte" (1892), J. Kauffmann

관련 논문AI추천

마태복음 2:15에서 호세아 11:1의 사용김성광한국구약학회 · 구약논단2019 · 제25권 제3호번역 이론(Translation Theory)의 관점에서 본 마태의 병렬 구약인용(Juxtaposed OT Quotation) 연구정우진한국개혁신학회 · 한국개혁신학2018 · 제58권 “애굽으로부터 내 아들을 불러냈다”(마태복음 2:15): 마태의 호세아 11:1 인용에 나타난 기독론적-모형론적 해석김창훈개혁주의학술원 · 갱신과 부흥2019 · 제24호마태복음의 이사야 인용구에 나타난 상호본문성(intertextuality)에 관한 연구소기천한국개혁신학회 · 한국개혁신학2012 · 제33권 마태복음 2:6의 구약 인용과 마태의 목자-기독론채영삼한국복음주의신약학회 · 신약연구2009 · 제8권 제1호A Critique of Peter Enns’s Understanding of the New Testament Use of the Old Testament김성진개혁주의학술원 · 갱신과 부흥2020 · 제25호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

네 생물 환상(겔 1:1-28)에 대한 칼빈의 해석:평가와 제언이희성pp. 1-30내본문적-상호본문적 접근을 통한 베드로전서의 우상숭배 모티프에 대한 연구강대훈pp. 31-60144,000명(계 7:3-8)에서 단 지파가 생략된 이유송영목pp. 61-94멜랑흐톤의 예정론임원택pp. 123-150유신진화론의 아담론 비판:데니스 알렉산더의 견해를 중심으로우병훈pp. 151-186
원문 보기