唐代 王言 문서의 생산과 유통 ― 唐 公式令을 중심으로 ―
Production and distribution of the Wangyan(王言) Document in Tang Dynasty — Centered on the Tang Code of Official Document Formulas(公式令) —
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, we look at the procedures of the production and distribution of the Wangyan(王言) Document in Tang Dynasty. The draft document drafted by the Central Secretariat(中書省) will be officially completed after deliberation by the Chancellery(門下省). The documents are not distributed individually but are transmitted to the Department of State Affairs(尙書省), which oversees all the documents and government ordinances of the whole country, and Six Ministries(六部) made the form of Fu(符) containing the contents of the document and went down to the province. In addition, we studied the legal system set up by Tang Dynasty by examining the rules for making the procedures of document administration accurate and prompt. Since there is no punishment rule in the ordinance itself, it has been possible to establish the related provisions and to enforce the document administration. Especially, in case of illegal acts related to the Wangyan(王言) Document, the punishment was heavily punished, so that the authority of the emperor was protected and the intention of the government was thoroughly carried out.
Abstract
In this article, we look at the procedures of the production and distribution of the Wangyan(王言) Document in Tang Dynasty. The draft document drafted by the Central Secretariat(中書省) will be officially completed after deliberation by the Chancellery(門下省). The documents are not distributed individually but are transmitted to the Department of State Affairs(尙書省), which oversees all the documents and government ordinances of the whole country, and Six Ministries(六部) made the form of Fu(符) containing the contents of the document and went down to the province. In addition, we studied the legal system set up by Tang Dynasty by examining the rules for making the procedures of document administration accurate and prompt. Since there is no punishment rule in the ordinance itself, it has been possible to establish the related provisions and to enforce the document administration. Especially, in case of illegal acts related to the Wangyan(王言) Document, the punishment was heavily punished, so that the authority of the emperor was protected and the intention of the government was thoroughly carried out.
참고문헌 (38)
- "隋書", ~
- "舊唐書", 中華書局
- 李林甫, "唐六典" (2014), 中華書局
- 長孫無忌, "唐律疏議" (1985), 中華書局
- 杜右, "通典" (2003), 中華書局
- 宋敏求, "唐大詔令集" (1992), 學林出版社
- 國史大系編修會, "令義解" (1977), 吉川弘文館
- 國史大系編修會, "令集解" (1985), 吉川弘文館
- 國家文物局古文獻硏究室, "吐魯番出土文書 7" (1986), 文物出版社
- 기요하라노 나츠노, "영의해 역주 하" (2014), 세창출판사
- 김택민, "譯註 唐律疏議 各則(上)" (1997), 한국법제연구원
- 김택민, "역주 당육전 상ㆍ중" (2005), 신서원
- 박준호, "고문서의 서명과 인장" (2016), 박이정
- 劉後賓, "唐代中書門下體制的硏究 : 公文形態政務運行與制度變遷" (2004), 齊魯書社
- 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" (1964), 東京大學出版會
- 池田溫, "唐令拾遺補" (1997), 東京大學出版會
- 中村裕一, "唐代制勅硏究" (1991), 汲古書院
- 中村裕一, "唐代官文書硏究" (1991), 中文出版社
- 中村裕一, "唐代公文書硏究" (1996), 汲古書院
- 中村裕一, "隋唐王言の硏究" (2003), 汲古書院
- 闞紅柳, "略論唐代檔案立法", 檔案學研究, 1999(1) (1999)
- 姜劍雲, "唐代文書檔案管理勾檢制度", 蘭台世界, 2014(14) (2014)
- 郭桂坤, "唐代前期的奏事文書與奏事制度", 唐硏究, 22 (2016)
- 高夢蝶, "唐代文書驛傳中的違法犯罪行爲及其處罰—淺析《唐律疏議》中的相關法律條文", 秘苑春秋, 2017(5) (2017)
- 金榮洲, "試論唐代對在文書工作中違法行爲的處罰", 唐史論叢, 16 (2013)
- 盧向前, "唐代政治經濟史綜論" (2012), 商務印書館
- 雷聞, "從S. 11287看唐代論事敕書的成立過程", 唐研究, 1 (1995), 北京大學出版社
- 鄧殿山, "唐代文書檔案管理制度及其法律化研究", 蘭台世界, 2013(10) (2013)
- 孫國贇, "唐代文書工作制度化研", 碩士, pp.2016
- 孫羽楠, "從唐代法規文件看唐代公文制度", 文敎資料, 2015(36) (2015)
- 劉聞文, "唐代文書擋案管理制度及其法律化研究", 蘭台世界, 2010(17) (2010)
- 劉太祥, "唐初文書制度試探", 許昌學院學報, 1988(3) (1988)
- 張啟安, "唐代公文制度硏究", 檔案學研究, 1997(4) (1997)
- 張雲珂, "從《唐律疏議》看唐代公務文書的規範化", 文敎資料, 2015(35) (2015)
- 馮琳, "唐代文書檔案保密制度探析", 辦公室業務, 2013(1) (2013)
- 河寶梅, "從《唐律疏義》看唐代公務文書處理的法制化", 浙江檔案, 2002(1) (2002)
- 河寶梅, "從《唐律疏議》到《大淸律例》看我國古代文書制度的法制化", 檔案與建設, 2007(10) (2007)
- 黄正建, "唐代“官文書”辨析—以《唐律疏議》爲基礎", 魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料, 33 (2016)