본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

秦代 공문서의 분류와 서사형식

A Study on Classification and Recording Format of Official Documents in the Qin Dynasty Period

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper organizes the results of the study so far on the classification method and classification system of the Qin-Han(秦漢) dynasties and discusses the form of Qin’s official documents and the name of documents, idioms, etc. centered on Li-ye(里耶) wooden materials. The contents of this paper are summarized as follows. First, considering the classification system of the Qin-Han dynasties and the name of documents used by people at that time, “Shu(書)” was also used as a general noun to refer to the entire document, but more specifically, the name of the document to which the sender and receiver are connected with the attached document, namely, the 'public document' today. Second, the official documents, “Shu(書)”, were used alone, but because they were used as a medium for distributing attachments, the official documents were largely composed of three forms: [1]Self-contained official document without attached document [2]The official documents and attachments are recorded in a separate wooden material [3]The official documents and attachments are recorded on the front and back side of a wooden material In the case of [1] and [2], the distinction between front side and back side of wooden material is not necessary, but in [3], it is necessary to distinguish whether the official part is front side or the attached document is front side. Considering the characteristics of a Li-ye wooden materials document's format or the method of writing the date of sending, can be called front side, where the attached document is recorded, rather than the official document. Third, the idioms used in the Li-ye wooden materials documents, particularly the expressions “ganyanzhi(敢言之)”, “gangao(敢告)”, “gao(告)”, “wei(謂)”, “shang(上)” and “xia(下)”, which express the delivery of the document, indicate that Han dynasty’s official documents was used on almost the same basis as the idioms. In particular, we could see that documents with “xia(下)” used in Li-ye wooden materials were subcontracted by the emperor and national authority, rather than by the sender's authority, like that of Han dynasty’s official documents. It was then confirmed that this characteristic of the Han dynasty’s document administration system was derived from Qin dynasty.

Abstract

This paper organizes the results of the study so far on the classification method and classification system of the Qin-Han(秦漢) dynasties and discusses the form of Qin’s official documents and the name of documents, idioms, etc. centered on Li-ye(里耶) wooden materials. The contents of this paper are summarized as follows. First, considering the classification system of the Qin-Han dynasties and the name of documents used by people at that time, “Shu(書)” was also used as a general noun to refer to the entire document, but more specifically, the name of the document to which the sender and receiver are connected with the attached document, namely, the 'public document' today. Second, the official documents, “Shu(書)”, were used alone, but because they were used as a medium for distributing attachments, the official documents were largely composed of three forms: [1]Self-contained official document without attached document [2]The official documents and attachments are recorded in a separate wooden material [3]The official documents and attachments are recorded on the front and back side of a wooden material In the case of [1] and [2], the distinction between front side and back side of wooden material is not necessary, but in [3], it is necessary to distinguish whether the official part is front side or the attached document is front side. Considering the characteristics of a Li-ye wooden materials document's format or the method of writing the date of sending, can be called front side, where the attached document is recorded, rather than the official document. Third, the idioms used in the Li-ye wooden materials documents, particularly the expressions “ganyanzhi(敢言之)”, “gangao(敢告)”, “gao(告)”, “wei(謂)”, “shang(上)” and “xia(下)”, which express the delivery of the document, indicate that Han dynasty’s official documents was used on almost the same basis as the idioms. In particular, we could see that documents with “xia(下)” used in Li-ye wooden materials were subcontracted by the emperor and national authority, rather than by the sender's authority, like that of Han dynasty’s official documents. It was then confirmed that this characteristic of the Han dynasty’s document administration system was derived from Qin dynasty.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김경호, "居延漢簡 元康五年詔書冊의 內容과 文書傳達", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.41~76 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
  2. 冨谷至, "목간과 죽간으로 본 중국 고대 문화사" (2005), 사계절
  3. 오준석, "里耶秦簡 ‘手’, ‘半’의 의미와 釋讀", 중국고중세사연구, (35), pp.205~236 (2015), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  4. 오준석, "里耶秦簡과 秦代 縣廷의 문서행정", 중국고중세사연구, (30), pp.1~74 (2013), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  5. 오준석, "秦․漢代 중앙 행정문서의 하달체계 연구", 동양사학연구, (145), pp.27~67 (2018), 동양사학회[DOI]
  6. 오준석, "漢代 행정문서의 서사 형식과 문서행정체계", 중국고중세사연구, (33), pp.81~126 (2014), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  7. 임중혁, "漢代의 文書行政", 中國學報, 29 (1989)
  8. 劉自穩, "里耶秦簡牘所見“作徒簿”呈送方式考察", 中國人民大學學報 (2018)
  9. 卜憲群, "從簡帛看秦漢鄕里的文書問題", 文史哲 (2007)
  10. 卜憲群, "秦漢官僚制度" (2002), 社會科學文獻出版社
  11. 沈剛, "《里耶秦簡》(壹)中的‘課’與‘計’ - 兼談戰國秦漢時期考績制度的流變", 魯東大學學報(哲學社會科學版) (2013)
  12. 汪桂海, "漢代官文書制度" (1999), 廣西敎育出版社
  13. 王子今, "里耶秦簡“郵利足”考", 首都師範大學學報 (2018)
  14. 文書分類, "碩士", 中國石油大學, 2014
  15. 于洪濤, "里耶秦簡文書簡分類整理與硏究", 博士, pp.2017
  16. 于洪濤, "從里耶簡看秦代緊急公文種類與遞送方式 – 兼談秦漢《行書律》相關問題", 檔案學通訊 (2018)
  17. 韋春喜, "秦代文書行政制度與公文關係芻議", 文學遺産 (2018)
  18. 李均明, "秦漢簡牘文書分類輯解" (2009), 文物出版社
  19. 李均明, "簡牘文書學" (1999), 廣西敎育出版社
  20. 李天虹, "居延漢簡簿籍分類硏究" (2003), 科學出版社
  21. 趙炳淸, "秦代地方行政運作形態之考察 – 以里耶秦簡爲中心", 史學月刊 (2015)
  22. 朱聖明, "秦代地方官員的文書傳遞職權 – 以里耶秦簡異地同級文書爲中心的考察", 南都學壇(人文社會科學學報), 38(1) (2018)
  23. 仲山茂, "秦漢時代の「官」と「曹」 - 縣の部局組織", 東洋學報, 82(4) (2001)
  24. 陳偉, "里耶秦簡牘校釋" (2011), 武漢大學出版社
  25. 陳偉, "歷史地理學硏究的新探索與新動向" (2008), 三秦出版社
  26. 邢義田, "湖南龍山里耶J1(8)157和J1(9)1-12號秦牘的文書構成、筆跡和原檔存放形式", 簡帛, 1 (2006), 武漢大學簡帛硏究中心
  27. 邢義田, "治國安邦 : 法制、行政與軍事" (2011), 中華書局
  28. 胡平生, "簡帛硏究2008" (2010), 廣西師範大學出版社
  29. 大庭脩, "秦漢法制史の硏究" (1982), 倉文社
  30. 大庭脩, "漢簡硏究" (1992), 同朋舍
  31. 藤田勝久, "中國古代國家と社會システム - 長江流域出土資料の硏究" (2009), 汲古書院
  32. 藤田勝久, "古代東アジアの情報傳達" (2008), 汲古書院
  33. 冨谷至, "邊境出土木簡の硏究" (2003), 朋友書店
  34. 冨谷至, "文書行政の漢帝國" (2010), 名古屋大學出版會
  35. 呂靜, "資料學の方法を探る 12" (2013), 愛媛大學「資料學」硏究會
  36. 劉欣寧, "秦漢時代の戶籍と個別人身支配 - 本籍地に關する考察 -", 史林, 95 (2012)
  37. 다카토리 유지, "秦漢時代の文書伝達形態 ― 里耶秦簡J1(16)5とJ1(16)6を中心に ―", 중국고중세사연구, (24), pp.239~275 (2010), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  38. 鷹取祐司, "秦漢時代公文書の下達形態", 立命館東洋史學, 31 (2008)
  39. 鷹取祐司, "秦漢官文書の基礎的硏究" (2015), 汲古書院
  40. 籾山明, "中國古代訴訟制度の硏究" (2006), 京都大學學術出版會
  41. 畑野吉則, "資料學の方法を探る 12" (2013), 愛媛大學「資料學」硏究會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)