南朝 시대 三年喪 “解官” 법률의 시행상 문제점과 개선책
A study on the Problem Improvements in the Enforcement of the Law of “Resignation from public office(解官)” for Three-Year Mourning in the Southern Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the problems of the law of “Resignation from public office(解官)” for Three-Year Mourning from the perspective of uncertainty in the standard of the mourning period, and reviewed measures of the southern countries that secured legal stability. One of the important criminal components of the Resignation law is the violation of the period of mourning. However, if the period of mourning is not clearly defined, it is impossible to judge the violation of the law itself. In this respect, the Resignation law had the following problems. First, the date of xuanji(禫祭), which means the end of the mourning period, was not unified. The court officially adopted Wangsuk's 25 months, but there were many people who followed Jeonghyeon's 27 months in the private sector. It was not until 27 months was announced as an official example in Song(宋), and all of the southern countries followed Song later. Unification of the date of xuanji should be a priority in order to eliminate the ambiguity and uncertainty of the law. Second, there is a problem of leap month as a matter to be particularly careful about in mourning period. Since it takes 13 months every 2-3 years, confusion occurs if there is no unified leap month application method when calculating the mourning period. In the Southern Dynasty, the principle of calculating leap month was repeatedly confirmed, that for one-year(朞年服) and three-year mourning the leap month was not calculated but for nine months(9月大功服) or less it separately calculated, which had the effect of enhancing legal stability. Third, the in-mind Mourning Rites(心喪制) introduced in the early Jin was followed by southern state. The original deadline for the in-mind Mourning was 25 months, but at that time, some people added xuanji(禫祭) to perform 27 months of mourning. If the deadline for in-mind Mourning is not clearly determined, administrative disruptions will occur, as well as serious judicial problems due to confusion in the criteria for judgement. In Song, a national law was announced to limit the deadline for in-mind Mourning to 25 months, and the Southern Dynasties followed suit. It should not be forgotten that all of the legal texts related to “Resignation from public office(解官)” in the statutes of the Sui-Tang period are laws that have come through the legislative and improvement process of the Yangjin-Nanjiao era.
Abstract
This study examined the problems of the law of “Resignation from public office(解官)” for Three-Year Mourning from the perspective of uncertainty in the standard of the mourning period, and reviewed measures of the southern countries that secured legal stability. One of the important criminal components of the Resignation law is the violation of the period of mourning. However, if the period of mourning is not clearly defined, it is impossible to judge the violation of the law itself. In this respect, the Resignation law had the following problems. First, the date of xuanji(禫祭), which means the end of the mourning period, was not unified. The court officially adopted Wangsuk's 25 months, but there were many people who followed Jeonghyeon's 27 months in the private sector. It was not until 27 months was announced as an official example in Song(宋), and all of the southern countries followed Song later. Unification of the date of xuanji should be a priority in order to eliminate the ambiguity and uncertainty of the law. Second, there is a problem of leap month as a matter to be particularly careful about in mourning period. Since it takes 13 months every 2-3 years, confusion occurs if there is no unified leap month application method when calculating the mourning period. In the Southern Dynasty, the principle of calculating leap month was repeatedly confirmed, that for one-year(朞年服) and three-year mourning the leap month was not calculated but for nine months(9月大功服) or less it separately calculated, which had the effect of enhancing legal stability. Third, the in-mind Mourning Rites(心喪制) introduced in the early Jin was followed by southern state. The original deadline for the in-mind Mourning was 25 months, but at that time, some people added xuanji(禫祭) to perform 27 months of mourning. If the deadline for in-mind Mourning is not clearly determined, administrative disruptions will occur, as well as serious judicial problems due to confusion in the criteria for judgement. In Song, a national law was announced to limit the deadline for in-mind Mourning to 25 months, and the Southern Dynasties followed suit. It should not be forgotten that all of the legal texts related to “Resignation from public office(解官)” in the statutes of the Sui-Tang period are laws that have come through the legislative and improvement process of the Yangjin-Nanjiao era.
참고문헌 (40)
- "史記", ~
- "漢書", ~
- "後漢書", ~
- "三國志", ~
- "晉書", ~
- "宋書", ~
- "南齊書", ~
- "梁書", ~
- "陳書", ~
- "南史", ~
- "魏書", ~
- "隋書", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- 김용천, "儀禮譯註 6" (2013), 세창출판사
- "禮記 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
- 劉俊文, "唐律疏議" (1983), 中華書局
- 李林甫, "역주 당육전" (2003), 신서원
- 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" (1964), 東京大學出版會
- 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺補" (1997), 東京大學出版會
- 동경대 고전연구회, "大唐開元禮" (1972), 汲古書院
- 杜佑, "通典" (1996), 中華書局
- 程樹德, "구조율고" (2015), 세창출판사
- 丁若鏞, "定本與猶堂全書 20책" (2012), 다산학술문화재단
- 藤川正数, "魏晋时代における丧服禮の硏究" (1960), 敬文社
- 張煥君, "魏晉南北朝喪服制度硏究", 박사, pp.2005
- 趙瀾, "唐代喪服制度硏究", 박사, pp.2008
- 倪彬, "漢唐“匿哀”等罪硏究", 박사, pp.2012
- 章管煒, "兩晋南北朝皇家公除心喪禮研究", 석사, pp.2014
- 丁凌華, "五服制度與傳統法律" (2013), 商務印書館
- 高二旺, "魏晉南北朝喪禮與社會" (2017), 上海古蹟出版社
- 張煥君, "情禮交融–喪服制度與魏晉南北朝社會" (2020), 商務印書館
- 김선민, "兩漢 이후 皇帝短喪制의 확립과 官人三年服喪의 入律", 동양사학연구, (98), pp.135~185 (2007), 동양사학회
- 김선민, "위진남북조 喪禮에서의 閏月의 문제와 법제화 과정", 동방학지, (162), pp.167~202 (2013), 국학연구원
- 김선민, "魏晉시기 관리의 三年喪 “解官” 법제화 과정", 동양사학연구, (158), pp.55~97 (2022), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 김정식, "唐 前期 官人 父母喪의 확립과 그 성격 ― 心喪·解官을 중심으로 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (28), pp.195~246 (2012), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 김용천, "兩晉시대 ‘爲人後者’의 服制 담론", 태동고전연구, 33, pp.135~172 (2014), 태동고전연구소
- 张旭華, "兩晉時期的喪禮實踐與中正清議", 史學月刊, (12) (2011)
- 高二旺, "兩晉南北朝官吏居喪違禮與淸議處罰", 華北水利水電大學學報, (12) (2009)
- 高二旺, "魏晉南北朝喪禮制度中的變禮", 南陽師範學院學報 (2015)
- 吳麗娛, "從「天聖令」對唐令的修改看唐宋制度之變遷 -「喪葬令」硏讀筆記三篇", 唐硏究, 12 (2006), 北京大學出版社
