초급 지휘관(자) 리더십 진단 및 피드백 시스템 개발
The Development of Leadership Assessment and Feedback System for First-line Military Leader
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study was to develop a leadership assessment tool for first-line military leaders who actually perform various kinds of assignments with their subordinates and are responsible for the results. Following the analysis of current state of leadership shown by first-line military leaders and literature reviews on previous leadership assessment tools, possible factors affecting the effectiveness of first-line military leaders were extracted. Evaluation factors were grouped into six broad categories: desirable character, warrior ethos, intellectual capacity, leading, developing, and achieving. Pilot test with a sample of a front division battalion(n=203) was conducted to check the validity and response distribution of survey items. The results of main test with a sample of seven battalions(n=1,944) showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ .81) for all the factors. Heavily unequal response distributions were not found. Prediction validity tests with a sample of another battalion showed support for positive relationships between evaluation factors developed by the present study and multiple leadership effectiveness variables. Other implications for future research on leadership assessment tools are discussed.
Abstract
The purposes of this study was to develop a leadership assessment tool for first-line military leaders who actually perform various kinds of assignments with their subordinates and are responsible for the results. Following the analysis of current state of leadership shown by first-line military leaders and literature reviews on previous leadership assessment tools, possible factors affecting the effectiveness of first-line military leaders were extracted. Evaluation factors were grouped into six broad categories: desirable character, warrior ethos, intellectual capacity, leading, developing, and achieving. Pilot test with a sample of a front division battalion(n=203) was conducted to check the validity and response distribution of survey items. The results of main test with a sample of seven battalions(n=1,944) showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ .81) for all the factors. Heavily unequal response distributions were not found. Prediction validity tests with a sample of another battalion showed support for positive relationships between evaluation factors developed by the present study and multiple leadership effectiveness variables. Other implications for future research on leadership assessment tools are discussed.
참고문헌 (20)
- 부대정신 제고 방안 연구, "김용주", 육군사관학교 화랑대 연구소, ~ (2011)
- 초급 지휘관(자)의 바람직한 리더십 연구, "김용주", 육군사관학교 리더십센터, ~ (2009)
- 김용진, "초급리더의 리더십 역량 비교연구 : 한국적 리더십모형을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- 육군 초급지휘관(자) 지휘통솔력 측정질문지 개발연구, "남기덕", 육군사관학교 화랑대 연구소, ~ (1997)
- 백기복, "한국형 리더십 개발을 위한 탐색적 연구", 한국형리더십컨퍼런스 발표논문집, pp.7~45 (2009)
- 육군본부, "군 리더십 : 야전교범 지-0" (2011), 육군본부
- 군 리더십 역할 모델 연구, "이종인", 한국국방연구원, ~ (1997)
- 육군 리더십 측정도구 표준화 연구, "이종인", 한국국방연구원, ~ (1999)
- 이준호, "중대장 리더십 진단도구 개발 및 활용에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- 임창희, "조직행동" (2007), 학현사
- 영관급 지휘관용 리더십 진단 프로그램 연구 및 개발, "최광표", 한국국방연구원, ~ (2007)
- 초급 지휘자 리더십 진단도구 개발 연구, "최병순", 육군교육사령부, ~ (2001)
- 최병순, "군 리더십" (2010), 북코리아
- Bass, B. M., "Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership(3rd)" (1990), The Free Press, Collier McMillan Publisher
- Church, A. H., "Advancing the State of the Art of 360-degree Feedback: Guest Editors' comments On the Research and Practice of Multirater Assessment Method", Group & Management, 22(2), pp.149~162 (1997)
- Department of the Army, "Army Leadership: FM 22-100", Department of the Army, ~ (2006)
- Off the track: Why and how successful executives get derailed, "McCall, M.", Center for Creative Leadership, ~, pp.Tech. Rep. No. 21 (1983)
- McClelland, D. C., "Power Is the Great Motivator", Harvard Business Review, 54(2), pp.100~110 (1976)
- Yukl, G., "Leadership in organizations" (2006), Prentice Hall
- Yukl, G., "Patterns of influence behavior for managers", Group & Organization Management, 18(1), pp.5~28 (1993)