군사사학적(軍事史學的) 관점에서 고찰한 임진왜란 시 청주성 및 금산성 전투
Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battle during the Imjin War in terms of the ‘military historic
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
-
Abstract
This study aims at examining Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battle during the Imjin War in terms of the ‘military historic’ perspective. It is on the battle by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops who fought against the Japanese army at Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress in order to learn the military historic perspective of those battles and its lesions. While majority official troops ran away from the Japanese army or were very passive in the battle to save life, the voluntary civilian troops made every effort to defeat the Japanese army under the supervision of Jo Heon even though they consisted of various social classes. As a result, the people relied on the voluntary civilian troops more than the official troops which attracted many more civilian volunteers. It not only enabled Jo Heon’s troop to defeat the Japanese troops at Cheongju Fortress but also made all civilian troops died at Geumsan Fortress battle which has no comparable case in the world war history. The strategic and military historic meaning of Cheongju Fortress and Geumsan Fortress battles are significant. The details are as follows. ① The battle demonstrated the important role of the leader ② The importance of the secure of strategic point ③ Integrated battle between people, public and military ④ The secure of war time mobilization system and the significance of civil-military strategy were raised. On the other hand, the poor points from the point of military history, ① Lack of preparation for battle ② Lack of understanding the strategy ③ Disputes between official troop and voluntary civilian troop ④ Lack of arm system, strategy text and training ⑤ Lack of battle support and war time mobility system. Cheongju Fortress battle and Geumsan Fortress battle are triumphant battles in terms of strategy and military by Jo Heon and voluntary civilian troops. When these two battles are an investigation, Joseon was deeply inclined to toadyism to Ming to protect the country rather than to reinforce the self-defense. Today’s atmosphere in the Korean peninsula is not that different. The 4 major countries repeatedly attempt to cause territorial disputes and history distortion. Therefore, we have to make every effort to create a powerful military unit for victory by bearing the maxim ‘prepare a war if you want peace” in mind
참고문헌 (21)
- 김용덕, "중봉 조헌 연구" (1977), 을유문화사
- 육군본부, "군사사연구방법론" (2010), 육군본부
- 이석린, "임란의병장 조헌연구" (1993), 신구문화사
- 조희진, "조헌 선생" (1994), 한국독서지도회
- 이종학, "한국군사사 연구" (2010), 충남대학교출판부
- 육군본부, "야전교범 3-0-1 군사용어사전", 국군인쇄창, ~ (2006)
- 육군본부, "야전교범 0 지상군기본교리", 국군인쇄창, ~ (2011)
- 곽호제, "任辰倭亂期 湖西義兵 硏究", 박사, 한국사, pp.1999
- 곽호제, "임진왜란기 청주성전투의 의병장 연구", 충남사학, 10 (1998)
- 임익순, "통제사 이순신과 원균의 지휘·통솔에 대한 군사사학적 비교연구", 박사, 군사학과 군사학전공, pp.2012
- 朴永喆, "중봉 조헌의 의병활동에 관한 연구", 석사, 역사교육, pp.1996
- 길병옥, "한국군 민사작전의 발전방향 및 향휴과제", 군사논단, (54) (2008)
- 김강녕, "임진왜란의 전황과 교훈에 관한 연구", 서석사회과학논총, (1)통권 : 1 (2008)
- 나태종, "의병장 조헌과 금산성 전투의 재조명", 군사논단, (66) (2011)
- 李錫麟, "重峰趙憲 硏究", 박사, pp.1985
- 이석린, "중봉 조헌의 군제개혁에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1975
- 이석린, "개혁사상가로서의 중봉 조헌", 옥천문화원발표논문집, ~ (2004)
- 주용성, "종봉 조헌의 실천철학 연구", 석사, pp.2009
- 최근묵, "임진왜란기 금산전투의 순절과 이치대첩에 대한 숭양", 충청학회 (2000)
- 韓基東, "重峰 趙憲의 義理精神에 對한 硏究", 석사, 한문교육, pp.1998
- "네이버 지식백과 검색", ~ (2012)
