16~17세기 여진의 성장과 요동 변경지대 성격 연구 - 변경지대의 변화를 통해 본 만리장성 동단기점설 비판 -
The Growth of Jurchens and the Character of the Liaodong Border Area : A Criticism on the Eastern Point of the Great Wall through the Change of Border Areas
1
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 16~17세기 여진사회의 역동적인 변화과정을 통해 만리장성의 동단기점이 압록강이라는 중국의 주장을 비판해 보고자 한 논문이다. 16세기의 동아시아 국제관계는 매우 긴박하게 돌아가고 있었다. 일본은 임진왜란을 통해 동아시아를 제패하려고 하였으며, 명나라는 여전히 동아시아의 강국임을 자부하며 몽골과 여진을 경계하면서 조선과 밀접한 관계를 강화시켜 나가고자 하였다. 그러나 16세기 후반기로 접어들면서 일본 이외에 여진지역에서 중요한 변화가 일어나고 있었다. 여진족이 부족을 점차 통합해 나가며 명의 遼東邊墻을 위협하면서 새로운 강자로 부상하고 있었다. 이러한 16세기 여진의 성장은 여진사의 복원을 뛰어넘어 16~17세기 동아시아 국제질서를 새롭게 조명할 수 있는 단서를 제공하고 있다는데 큰 의미가 있다. 현재 중국은 만리장성 동단기점을 압록강이라고 주장하고 명대 만주 지역에 산재하던 대부분의 여진족이 명의 기미위소로 살아갔다고 주장한다. 이는 곧 여진지역이 명의 강역이었다는 주장으로 연결된다. 그러나 16세기 여진사회의 역동적인 성장 모습과 이들에 대한 명나라 변경정책의 실상을 살펴본 결과 명나라는 수세적 변경정책을 취하였으며 압록강 변에 만리장성과 같은 연결된 벽돌성을 축조한 적이 없었다. 장성의 기본 개념은 ‘일선으로 연결된 성벽’을 의미한다. 중국은 명대 요동을 방어하기위해 설치한 요동변장을 확대해석하여 만리장성으로 주장하며, 그 마지막 지점인 호산산성에 산해관과 같은 벽돌장성을 산등성이를 따라 일선으로 축조하였고 만리장성의 동단기점이라고 주장하고 있다. 그러나 연구결과 동단기점으로 알려진 호산산성은 명대 강연대보가 있던 자리였으며 이것은 명나라가 여진방어를 위해 압록강 유역의 고구려 성을 활용한 고립된 석성이자 여진을 방어하기 위한 전초기지에 불과함을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 전초기지를 중국이 만리장성으로 둔갑시킨 결과가 현재의 호산산성이며 이를 통해 전체적으로 명대 요동지배가 매우 견고하고 명의 강역이 매우 넓었다는 이론적 틀을 만들어 나가고 있다. 90년대 이후 중국이 만리장성의 동단기점을 압록강유역으로 확장시킨 배경에는 '강역의 확장'이라는 단순한 관점을 넘어 근세 만주 역사에 대한 선점, 변경의 안정 , 북한에 대한 대응, 경제 개발 등과 같이 현실과 미래에 닥칠 다양한 문제를 복합적으로 풀어나가고자 하는 현실적 목적이 있었음을 알 수 있었다.
Abstract
This study aims at illuminating the fabrication of the Amnok (鴨綠)River being the eastern point of the Great Wall in the light of the dynamic development of Jurchens in the sixteenth century. The background, meaning, and intention of the extension of the eastern part to the Amnok River shall be examined. A critical change was in progress in the international relations in the century. While Japan tried to take dominance in East Asia through the Imjin War, Ming still took a pride as the superpower in East Asia,reinforcing close relations with Chosun. However, a significant change in the sixteenth century was also witnessed in Jurchen areas as Jurchens attempted to become involved in new international affairs by absorbing large Manchurian tribes. However, the sixteenth century situation has not been the focal point because it has been blocked by a Chinesecentered historical view which includes the Amnok River hypothesis of the Great Wall. Why is it important to examine the Chinese position academically through the sixteenth century Jurchens? Is it justifiable or necessary?The reason for China to extend the eastern point down to the Amnok River was to preoccupy Manchurian history beyond a view of ‘expanding river area’, to keep stability in the midst of Northeast Asia’s political environment surrounding Manchuria which has already been revealed in the “Northeast Project,” and to counter North Korea. Accordingly, it might be said that the current historical situation in China to solve contemporary and future problems that they face might be an actual pivot in the background. When Zhu Yuanzhang (朱元璋) founded the Ming dynasty in 1368,had to withdraw to the Mongol area. When the Yuan government lost dominancy, Ming progressed into Liaodong and established the Liaodong Regional Military Commission (遼東都司) and succeeded in occupying a part of Liaodong. They intended to spread out to Mongolia and Heilongjiang (黑龍江). However, after Emperor Yongle’s in 1424, death (1403~1424) as no more active foreign policy was available, they changed their strategy to defend Liaodong through the Liaodong Regional Military Commission the which was leading to founding a solid Liaodong defense line in the middle and late Ming dynasty. Soon, became a military organization in the far eastern area to defend Liaodong in the beginning of the fifteenth century. Although there was some time to seek expansion during Yongle’s reign, they had a defensive role in general in the relation with northern territory tribes. Along with this background, the Liaodong defense line was moved back and they began to establish an outpost at the Amnok River. China today has nearly completed a theory that the eastern point of the Great Wall was the Amnok River, allegedly arguing that the Liaodong defense line was part of the Great Wall. This results from falsely assuming that some outposts created by Ming were part of the Great Wall. This in turn logically generates a frame that Ming had a solid reign over Liaodong. This reflects the current intention of China to remove any possible future conflicts with nearby countries over the riverside domain and Manchuria. Whether the eastern point of the Great Wall can be the Amnok River is especially important for determining the Ming dynasty’s sovereignty and territorial coverage. When China started the Northeastern Project,river territory in Ming became an important topic of study, and the book A Study on Northeastern Area in Ming dynasty (Jilin People Press,2008) was a typical work published in 2008 as a result of research to date. This book also argues that the Manchuria area during the Ming dynasty belonged to Ming. However, as this study shows, the Amnok River cannot be the starting point in the east. The Amnok River met the border with Joseon,Ming, and the Jurchens, who were struggling for power. Furthermore,what Ming constructed in the river area of the River huge wall, but a small outpost. That outpost is a small fort that utilized the natural topography. And even it was not constructed with bricks. If China presumes the basic concept of the Great Wall is a line, Liaodong border area linked from Shanhaiguan (山海關) through Kaiyuan (開原) itself cannot be part of the Great Wall.
참고문헌 (25)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- "明史", ~
- "明通鑑", ~
- "明會典", ~
- "明會要", ~
- "奉天通志", ~
- "使朝鮮錄", ~
- "遼海叢書", 1~5
- 姜龍範, "明代中朝關系史" (1999), 黑龍江朝鮮民族出版社
- 郭大順, "遼寧長城" (1998), 遼寧省長城學會
- 董曜會, "瓦合集-長城硏究文論" (2004), 科學出版社
- 景愛, "中國長城史" (2006), 上海人民出版社
- 佟冬主, "中國東北史" (1998), 吉林文史出版社
- 簿音湖, "明代蒙古漢籍史料彙編" (2000), 內蒙古大學出版社
- 楊昭全, "中朝邊界史" (1993), 吉林文史出版社
- 楊暘, "明代奴兒干都司及其衛所硏究" (1982), 中州書畵社
- 楊暘, "明代遼東都司" (1988), 中州古籍出版社
- 楊 暘, "中國的東北社會 十四~十七世紀" (1991), 遼寧人民出版社
- 牛建强, "明代中後期社會變遷硏究" (1997), 文津出版社
- 魏志江, "中韓關系史硏究" (2006), 中山大學出版社
- 劉謙, "明遼東鎭長城及防御考" (1989), 文物出版社
- 趙東升, "扈倫四部硏究" (2005), 吉林文史出版社
- 趙云田, "中國治邊機構史" (2002), 中國藏學出版社
- 朱誠如, "管窺集" (2002), 紫禁城出版社
- 華夏子, "明長城考實" (1988), 檔案出版社
