종류주식의 다양화에 관한 법적 고찰
A Legal Study for Diversification of Class Shares
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most Korean corporations are concerned with the issuance of stocks because, after the IMF crisis, many of the banks who lent money to corporations are now unable to lend money to them. Moreover, access to the equity capital market in Korea is significantly limited due to the Korean Commercial Code ("Code") amended in 2008. The Code essentially prohibits class shares with different rights firmly based on the principle of shareholders equality. In order to extend the defensive mechanism against a hostile M&A, it is required to introduce limited disparate voting rights, expand a stock class of voting rights, introduce compulsory convertible shares and release limitations on acquiring treasury stock. Although multiple voting rights cannot be fully accepted, it is justified to allow disparate voting rights to impose multiple voting rights in proportion to the ownership period, provided that the voting caps are established. Further, in order to utilize the merit of non-voting shares, it is necessary to introduce limited non-voting common shares and other types of non-voting shares, except for certain resolutions. This article suggests that the revision of Korean Commercial Code and introduction of new class shares are needed for raising capital and revitalization.
Abstract
Most Korean corporations are concerned with the issuance of stocks because, after the IMF crisis, many of the banks who lent money to corporations are now unable to lend money to them. Moreover, access to the equity capital market in Korea is significantly limited due to the Korean Commercial Code ("Code") amended in 2008. The Code essentially prohibits class shares with different rights firmly based on the principle of shareholders equality. In order to extend the defensive mechanism against a hostile M&A, it is required to introduce limited disparate voting rights, expand a stock class of voting rights, introduce compulsory convertible shares and release limitations on acquiring treasury stock. Although multiple voting rights cannot be fully accepted, it is justified to allow disparate voting rights to impose multiple voting rights in proportion to the ownership period, provided that the voting caps are established. Further, in order to utilize the merit of non-voting shares, it is necessary to introduce limited non-voting common shares and other types of non-voting shares, except for certain resolutions. This article suggests that the revision of Korean Commercial Code and introduction of new class shares are needed for raising capital and revitalization.
참고문헌 (15)
- 곽관훈, "벤처기업에 있어서의 株主間 契約", 상사법연구, 22(1), pp.329~357 (2003), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "적대적 M&A의 일본의 최근 동향", 상사판례학회 공동학술대회발표자료 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 권종호, "종류주식의 다양화와 경영권 방어 in: 주식법제개편의 전망과 과제", 2008년 춘계학술대회 발표자료집 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 김성호, "트래킹 스톡(Tracking Stock)의 도입을 위한 회사법상 문제점 -독일 주식법(AktG)상의 논의를 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 26(1), pp.179~208 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 김순석, "종류주식의 다양화와 자금조달의 유연성에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.9~50 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 김택주, "포이슨 필의 이용방안과 문제점", 공동학술대회 발표논문집 (2006), 한국기업법학회[DOI]
- 송 종 준, "방어적 주식제도의 국제적 입법동향과 도입 과제 - 2006년 회사법 개정안을 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 17(2), pp.91~128 (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 송종준, "M&A에 대한 주요 방어대책", 상사법연구, 14(1) (1995), 한국상사법학회
- 왕상한, "外國人 投資規制를 위한 개정법률안에 관한 소고", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.9~31 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 윤영신, "미국법상 트랙킹 스톡(tracking stock)에 대한 고찰", 21세기 한국상사법의 과제와 전망(심당 송상현선생화갑기념논문집 (2002)
- 이형규, "주식회사의 재배구조에 관한 회사법 개정시안 토론요지", 상사법연구, 25(2) (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 정동윤, "상법(상) (제4판)" (2009), 법문사
- 최승재, "한국판 ‘엑슨-플로리어법’제정에 대한 연구 - 입법론을 중심으로", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.311~363 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- Jeffrey J. Hass, "Directorial Fiduciary Duties in a Tracking Stock Equity Structure : The Need for a Duty of Fairness", Michigan Law Review, 94 (1996)
- Paul L. Davies, "Principles of Modern Company Law" (2003), Sweet & Mawwell
