종류주식의 쟁점과 과제
Issues of Class Stock
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Commercial Act has been revised from April 15, 2012 with the most significant amendments after its enactment. The amendment was made to around 250 provisions resulting in debates, and especially the matter of class stock was severely debated with respect to its variety due to the possibility of abusing it as a defensive measures to hostile M&A. As a result, most of class stocks that the Legal Department had considered were excluded from the last amended Act, and only one type of class stock with limiting/excluding voting right was newly adopted. However, a new issue was raised in relation to the legal nature of common stock under the revised Commercial Act, i.e. how we can differentiate common stock with class stock. There are two types of common stocks different from legal perspective:① common stock which becomes a standard stock when more than two class stocks are issued in relation to profit dividend et al based on Articles 344 to 346 of the Commercial Act; and ② common stock issued following ordinary new stock issuance process under Article 416. As class stock includes the standard stock and the other stock, ① is class stock while ②is not in corporate legal perspective. As redemption stock and conversion stock can be issued as class stock (Article 345 Clause 5, Article 346 Clauses 1 and 2), stocks that can be issued as redemption stock and conversion stock are commony stocks under ①, which is class stock, but are not common stock under ②, which is not class stock. The type of class stock is varied and each type of class stock has various functions. For example, golden stock and class voting stock, which was included in the amended Commercial Act in 2006, are important for the small sized or venture company founder to have the management right and for the investor not only to check the management right but also to succeed to business and promote venture capital investments. Despite this, those stocks were not adopted because of the possibility of abusing those as defensive measures. It is expected that new policies focusing on mid/small size companies will be established under a notion of economic democracy with the new government. It needs to be perceived that class stock can be an important measure to solve issues of mid/small size companies, and additional legislation shall be made sooner or later as to class stock, which was considered in 2006 and 2009 amendments, in a manner to maximize its effectiveness while minimizing its backfires.
Abstract
The Commercial Act has been revised from April 15, 2012 with the most significant amendments after its enactment. The amendment was made to around 250 provisions resulting in debates, and especially the matter of class stock was severely debated with respect to its variety due to the possibility of abusing it as a defensive measures to hostile M&A. As a result, most of class stocks that the Legal Department had considered were excluded from the last amended Act, and only one type of class stock with limiting/excluding voting right was newly adopted. However, a new issue was raised in relation to the legal nature of common stock under the revised Commercial Act, i.e. how we can differentiate common stock with class stock. There are two types of common stocks different from legal perspective:① common stock which becomes a standard stock when more than two class stocks are issued in relation to profit dividend et al based on Articles 344 to 346 of the Commercial Act; and ② common stock issued following ordinary new stock issuance process under Article 416. As class stock includes the standard stock and the other stock, ① is class stock while ②is not in corporate legal perspective. As redemption stock and conversion stock can be issued as class stock (Article 345 Clause 5, Article 346 Clauses 1 and 2), stocks that can be issued as redemption stock and conversion stock are commony stocks under ①, which is class stock, but are not common stock under ②, which is not class stock. The type of class stock is varied and each type of class stock has various functions. For example, golden stock and class voting stock, which was included in the amended Commercial Act in 2006, are important for the small sized or venture company founder to have the management right and for the investor not only to check the management right but also to succeed to business and promote venture capital investments. Despite this, those stocks were not adopted because of the possibility of abusing those as defensive measures. It is expected that new policies focusing on mid/small size companies will be established under a notion of economic democracy with the new government. It needs to be perceived that class stock can be an important measure to solve issues of mid/small size companies, and additional legislation shall be made sooner or later as to class stock, which was considered in 2006 and 2009 amendments, in a manner to maximize its effectiveness while minimizing its backfires.
참고문헌 (30)
- 권기범, "제4판 현대회사법론" (2012), 삼영사
- 법무부, "상법(회사편)개정안 설명자료", ~ (2007)
- 법무부, "상법회사편해설", ~ (2012)
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2013), 홍문사
- 이철송, "2011개정상법-축조해설" (2011), 박영사
- 이철송, "2011 개정상법" (2011), 박영사
- 임재연, "회사법" (2012), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2012), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 최준선, "2011 개정상법 회사편 해설", 한국상장회사협의회, ~ (2011)
- 권재열, "개정상법상 주식관련제도의 개선내용과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (56)통권 : 56, pp.1~30 (2011), 법무부
- 권종호, "2006년 회사법개정시안의 주요내용 ― 자금조달관련사항을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.303~338 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "적대적 M&A방어수단의 도입필요성, In 적대적 M&A 방어수단의 도입을위한 상법개정공청회자료집", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 김순석, "종류주식의 다양화와 자금조달의 유연성에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.9~50 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 김효신, "종류주식 다양화의 법적문제", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.165~191 (2010), 법학연구소
- 문준우, "미국 회사법상 종류주식에 관한 小考", 강원법학, 33, pp.307~328 (2011), 비교법학연구소
- 박철영, "종류주식의 활용과 법적 과제 - 의결권제한주식을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 25(4), pp.9~42 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요쟁점 - 기업재무 분야를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (127), pp.45~79 (2011), 한국법학원
- 송종준, "상장회사의 자기자본질서의 변화와 법적 과제 - 개정 상법과 자본시장법 개정안상 몇 가지 쟁점을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.143~179 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 심영, "개정상법상 종류주식에 대한 고찰", 일감법학, 22(22), pp.109~138 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 양만식, "종류주식의 다양화가 기업지배에 미치는 영향", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.35~71 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 이현철, "방어수단으로서 신주인수선택권의 적절성", 적대적 M&A 방어수단의도입을 위한 상법개정공청회자료집 (2009), 법무부
- 정동윤, "보통주와 종류주의 개념에 관하여-개정상법의 해석과 관련하여-", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.37~53 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 정수용, "개정상법상 종류주식의 다양화", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 최완진, "종류주식의 다양화에 관한 법적 고찰", 경영법률, 20(1), pp.247~271 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 相澤哲, "論点解説新会社法" (2006)
- 江頭憲治郎, "株式会社法" (2011)
- 神田秀樹, "会社法" (2012)
