종류주식의 다양화와 자금조달의 유연성에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석
The Analysis of Legal Issues Regarding Diversification of Class Stock and Flexibility of Equity Financing
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the Revised Draft of Korean Commercial Code(KCC) which was announced for public comments on May 7, 2008 by the Korean Ministry of Justice, various class stocks are scheduled to be introduced in order to enhance the efficiency of corporate equity financing. Class stock of profit sharing and distribution of remaining asset, class stock of restraining voting rights, class stock of share transfer, class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility are included. This article mainly deals with class stock of profit sharing and distribution of remaining asset, class stock of redemption, and class stock of convertibility. First of all, the draft of the KCC does not adopt tracking stock system. Considering current Korea’s accounting principles and practices, it seems to be difficult to introduce tracking stock in near future which reflects the performance of specific business, or group of business owned by issuing company. However, it is desirable to introduce tracking stock which links the performance of subsidiary’s business, because the subsidiary is independent corporate entity and it will be much easier to reflect the performance of subsidiary’s business. Regarding class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility, even though lots of regulated legal measures are alleviated in order for efficient equity financing, redemption of common stock is not allowed because of worrying abuse as a defense mechanism of hostile merger and acquisition. This problem is mainly related to public companies. However the KCC applies public and closed companies together. Therefore, the KCC must allow redemption of common stock, and problem of public companies caused by redeeming common stock should be dealt through the enlisted manual of stock exchange. This article also suggests to integrate current separate provisions of class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility. It offers to expand the financial resources for redeeming class stock of redemption. In addition to distributable earnings, legal reserve which can be classified into the earned surplus reserve and the capital surplus reserve may be utilized as redeemable financial resources. Finally, this article analyzes how shareholders’ equal rights affect in developing various class stocks.
Abstract
According to the Revised Draft of Korean Commercial Code(KCC) which was announced for public comments on May 7, 2008 by the Korean Ministry of Justice, various class stocks are scheduled to be introduced in order to enhance the efficiency of corporate equity financing. Class stock of profit sharing and distribution of remaining asset, class stock of restraining voting rights, class stock of share transfer, class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility are included. This article mainly deals with class stock of profit sharing and distribution of remaining asset, class stock of redemption, and class stock of convertibility. First of all, the draft of the KCC does not adopt tracking stock system. Considering current Korea’s accounting principles and practices, it seems to be difficult to introduce tracking stock in near future which reflects the performance of specific business, or group of business owned by issuing company. However, it is desirable to introduce tracking stock which links the performance of subsidiary’s business, because the subsidiary is independent corporate entity and it will be much easier to reflect the performance of subsidiary’s business. Regarding class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility, even though lots of regulated legal measures are alleviated in order for efficient equity financing, redemption of common stock is not allowed because of worrying abuse as a defense mechanism of hostile merger and acquisition. This problem is mainly related to public companies. However the KCC applies public and closed companies together. Therefore, the KCC must allow redemption of common stock, and problem of public companies caused by redeeming common stock should be dealt through the enlisted manual of stock exchange. This article also suggests to integrate current separate provisions of class stock of redemption and class stock of convertibility. It offers to expand the financial resources for redeeming class stock of redemption. In addition to distributable earnings, legal reserve which can be classified into the earned surplus reserve and the capital surplus reserve may be utilized as redeemable financial resources. Finally, this article analyzes how shareholders’ equal rights affect in developing various class stocks.
참고문헌 (52)
- 권종호, "2006년 회사법개정시안의 주요내용 ― 자금조달관련사항을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.303~338 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 국회 법제사법위원회, "상법 일부개정법률안(정부제출) 검토보고" (2007)
- 김성호, "트래킹 스톡(Tacking Stock)의 도입을 위한 회사법상 문제점 ― 독일 주식법(AktG)상의 논의를 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 26(1) (2007)
- 김성호, "트래킹 스톡(Tracking Stock)의 개념과 허용 가능성", 기업법연구, 20(3) (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 김순석, "주식회사 법정준비금제도의 재검토", 상사법연구, 23(3) (2004), 한국상사법학회
- 박세화, "주식회사의 자금조달의 활성화를 위한 새로운 주식 제도", 상사법연구, 24(3) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 박철영, "종류주식의 확대와 주주간 이해조정", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 박철영, "상법상 주식제도의 문제점 및 과제", 기업법연구, 19(3) (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 박철영, "종류주식의 다양화를 위한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 손 성, "트래킹스톡 발행회사(TSC)에서의 법적 문제 ― 미국법상 이익충돌문제의 해결을 중심으로 ―", 상장협, (46) (2002)
- 송종준, "방어적 주식제도의 국제적 입법동향과 도입 과제 ― 2006년 회사법 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 경영법률, 17(2) (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 윤영신, "미국법상 트랙킹 스톡(tracking stock)에 대한 고찰", 21세기 한국상사법의 과제와 전망(심당송상현선생화갑기념논문집) (2002)
- 윤영신, "상법상 다양한 증권발행의 촉진방안에 관한 연구 ― 트래킹스톡을 중심으로 ―" (2001), 한국법제연구원
- 이기욱, "트래킹주식과 이사의 의무 ― 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로 ―", 법과 정책연구, 4(2) (2004), 한국법정책학회
- 이영주, "트래킹스톡에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 20 (2005), 한국법학
- 이철송, (2008), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법 개정방향에 관한 연구" (2004), 한국상장회사협의회
- 최준선, (2006), 삼영사
- 加藤和成, "わが國における-トラッンキング·ストックの導入に可能性と問題點(2)", 商事法務, 1558 (2000)
- 江頭憲治郞, (2005), 有斐閣
- 江頭憲治郞, (2008), 有斐閣
- 關谷理記, "子會社連動株式(日本版トラッキンッグ·ストック)の開發", 商事法務, 1581 (2000)
- 關谷理記, "M&Aと資金調達 －トラッンキング·ストックを中心に－, ?M&A法大全" (2001), 商事法務硏究會
- 宏戶善一, "種類株式，ストック·オプション等の自由化", ジュリスト, 1206 (2001)
- 南保勝美, "新會社法における株主平等原則の意義と機能", 法律論叢, 79(2-3) (2007)
- 大杉謙一, "トラッキング·ストック", 法學敎室, 250 (2001)
- 大杉謙一, "優先株の實務的問題(Ⅱ)", 商事法務, 1443 (1996)
- 永眞生, "新會社法實務相談" (2006), 商事法務
- 森本 滋, "會社法の下における株主平等原則", 商事法務, 1825 (2008)
- 上村達男, "株主平等原則, 特別講義商法" (1995), 有斐閣
- 細川 健, "エクイティ·ファイナンスの新展開⑴ ― 米國の現狀", 商事法務, 1548 (2001)
- 須藤正彦, "義務償還株式 ― 取得請求權付株式を視野に入れて, 最近倒産法·會社法をめぐる實務上の諸問題" (2005)
- 神田秀樹, "新しい株式制度" (2002), 有斐閣
- 安藤博之, "トラッキング·ストックとグル?プ戰略", 月刊 資本市場, 194 (2001)
- 野村修也, "新會社法の意義と問題點 ― 株式の多樣化とその制約原理", 商事法務, 1775 (2006)
- 橡川泰史, "トラッンキング·ストックや新株豫約權はどのよに活用できるのか", 法學セミナ, 47(11) (2002)
- 葉玉匡美, "議決權制限株式を利用した買收防衛策", 商事法務, 1743 (2005)
- 日本銀行金融硏究所, "デットとエクイティに關する法原理についての硏究會?報告書", 金融硏究, 20(3) (2001)
- 前田 庸, (2008), 有斐閣
- 鳥本喜章, "優先株式に關する實務的問題(1)", 商事法務, 1337 (1993)
- 中島達哉, "エクイティ·ファイナンスの新展開⑷ ― トラッキング·ストックの效用(その2)", 商事法務, 1551 (2001)
- 太田 洋, "トラッキング·ストック”, ?ファイナンス法大全(上)" (2003), 商事法務
- 黑沼悅郞, "日本におけるトラッンキング·ストックの導入と課題", 증권법연구, 2(2) (2001), 韓國證券法學會
- ABA, "Model Business Corporation Act Annotated 3rd ed., Vol. 1" (1993), Prentice Hall & Business
- Dickson G. Brown, "Tracking Stock", pp.2002, 548 PLI
- Stephen I. Glover, "The Tracking Stock Company’s Board of Director" (2001), 4 NO. 9 M&A Law. 27
- Stephen I. Glover, "Business Separation Transaction : Spin-Offs, Subsidiary IPOs and Tracking Stock" (2002), Law Journal Press
- Jeffrey J. Hass, "Directorial Fiduciary Duties in a Tracking Stock Equity Structure: The Need for a Duty of Fairness" (1996), 94 Mich. L. Rev. 2089
- "Lewis v. H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc., 331 Mass. 670, 121 N.E.2d 850", ~ (1954)
- Jeffrey J. Schick, "Toward Transaction-Specific Standards of Directorial Fiduciary Duty in the Tracking-Stock Context" (2000), 75 Wash. L. Rev. 1365
- A Gilchrist Sparks, Ⅲ, "Merger Issues at the New Millenium: Strategic Deals, Tracking Stocks and the Duty to Be Informed", pp.2000, 1158 PLI
- Dirk A. Verse, "Der Gleichbehandlungsgrudsatz im Recht der Kapitalgeschellschaften" (2006)