개정상법상 종류주식을 활용한 방어수단
Defensive Measures Using The Class of Shares on The Revised Commercial Code
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There was 2006 and 2008 Revision Draft to Korean Commercial Code for the revision draft for the class of shares as we saw, but a portion has been dropped or not even submitted to the National Assembly. However, because of the government's ongoing efforts, National Assembly has passed after six years "The company act of the commercial law" on March 11, 2011 and the amendment (Law No. 10,600) was performed from April 15, 2012. But the amendment on class of shares was limited in a total five kinds of the class of shares, the class of shares of transfer restrictions in amendments to '2008' was deleted and the remaining shares were introduced in the revised Commercial Code. Another feature of this revised Act is expected to reduce cases that the minority shareholders resist the corporate restructuring of the reasonable way due to the introduction of freeze-out of the minority shares for the unfair business reasons. In addition, it will work as a means of various M&A for the maximum synergy effect and the efficient restructuring with allowing cash-out merger and triangular merger. In this thesis, after considering these viewpoints, I studied ways that can be utilized in hostile M&A around the class of shares about voting rights limit shares and convertible reason shares among the class of shares was introduced in 2011. In addition, I investigated plans expected high utilization for use of the class of shares for the benefit of medium and small-sized enterprises. Therefore, it seems that these measures need to be emphasized again. There was no case that the class of shares was used as a means of defense against hostile M&A before the introduction of the class of shares, before Revised Commercial Code. And, in situations of hostile M&A, whether the target company's board of directors can conduct defense act or not has been treated as a matter of whether ‘managerial purposes’ are recognized when new shares, issuance of convertible bond or bond with warrants is allowed to friendly shareholders or the issuance of unfair methods in the case of disabled rights issue. Although the revised Commercial Code introduced the class of shares, the class of shares is expected to be used frequently in the future in the absence of the utilized case as a means of defense against hostile M&A.
Abstract
There was 2006 and 2008 Revision Draft to Korean Commercial Code for the revision draft for the class of shares as we saw, but a portion has been dropped or not even submitted to the National Assembly. However, because of the government's ongoing efforts, National Assembly has passed after six years "The company act of the commercial law" on March 11, 2011 and the amendment (Law No. 10,600) was performed from April 15, 2012. But the amendment on class of shares was limited in a total five kinds of the class of shares, the class of shares of transfer restrictions in amendments to '2008' was deleted and the remaining shares were introduced in the revised Commercial Code. Another feature of this revised Act is expected to reduce cases that the minority shareholders resist the corporate restructuring of the reasonable way due to the introduction of freeze-out of the minority shares for the unfair business reasons. In addition, it will work as a means of various M&A for the maximum synergy effect and the efficient restructuring with allowing cash-out merger and triangular merger. In this thesis, after considering these viewpoints, I studied ways that can be utilized in hostile M&A around the class of shares about voting rights limit shares and convertible reason shares among the class of shares was introduced in 2011. In addition, I investigated plans expected high utilization for use of the class of shares for the benefit of medium and small-sized enterprises. Therefore, it seems that these measures need to be emphasized again. There was no case that the class of shares was used as a means of defense against hostile M&A before the introduction of the class of shares, before Revised Commercial Code. And, in situations of hostile M&A, whether the target company's board of directors can conduct defense act or not has been treated as a matter of whether ‘managerial purposes’ are recognized when new shares, issuance of convertible bond or bond with warrants is allowed to friendly shareholders or the issuance of unfair methods in the case of disabled rights issue. Although the revised Commercial Code introduced the class of shares, the class of shares is expected to be used frequently in the future in the absence of the utilized case as a means of defense against hostile M&A.
참고문헌 (39)
- 경제개혁연대, "상법 일부개정법률안(의안번호 1566)에 대한 의견서", ~ (2008)
- 적대적 M&A의 방어방법에 관한 연구, "권재열", 코협, ~, pp.연구보고서 05-1 (2005)
- 권재열, "경제법" (2005), 법원사
- 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "종류주식의 다양화를 위한 법적 연구", 상사법연구, (51) (2006)
- 김순석, "주식제도의 개선 - 종류주식을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.131~173 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 김윤상, "2011년 상법개정의 입법과정과 향후과제", 2011년 하계학술대회 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 김지환, "삼각합병 활용과 법적과제", 한국경영법률학회 ․ 한국기업법학회 2011년 추계공동학술대회 발표자료 (2011), 한국경영법률학회 ․ 한국기업법학회
- 김홍기, "MBO거래의 법적 쟁점과 운용방안에 대한 연구", 경영법률, 22(2), pp.1~34 (2012), 한국경영법률학회
- 박철영, "종류주식의 활용과 법적과제 –의결권제한주식을 중심으로-", 한국경영법률학회․한국기업법학회 2011년 추계공동학술대회 발표자료 (2011), 한국경영법률학회․한국기업법학회
- 법무부 법무실, "상법(회사편)개정 특별분과위원회 회의록", ~ (2006)
- 법무부, "2011년 개정상법(회사편)의 주요내용", 선진상사법률, 통권 : 54 (2011)
- 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요쟁점 –기업재무분야를 중심으로-", 2011년 한국법학원 발표자료, ~ (2011)
- 송종준, "방어적 주식제도의 국제적 입법동향과 도입 과제 - 2006년 회사법 개정안을 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 17(2), pp.91~128 (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 안경봉, "삼각합병제도와 과세", 법학논총, 22(2), pp.259~303 (2010), 법학연구소
- 양만식, "종류주식의 다양화가 기업지배에 미치는 영향", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.35~71 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 이철송, "2011 개정상법 –축조해설-" (2011), 박영사
- 적대적 M&A 방어수단관련 현행법상 문제점과 개선방안, "전국경제인연합회", ~ (2005)
- 정동윤, "회사법" (2007), 법문사
- 정윤모, "개정상법상 삼각합병에 대한 이해", 상장 (2011)
- 지호준, "M&A : 기업인수․합병" (2004), 법문사
- 참여연대, "상법(회사편) 개정 법무부안에 대한 참여연대 의견서", ~ (2008)
- 한국거래소, "외국인 주식취득 현황 및 추이", ~ (2011)
- 한국거래소, "주가순자산비율(PBR)현황", ~ (2008)
- 한국거래소, "주요기업 시가총액 및 주가등락", ~ (2011)
- 적대적 M&A관련 법제의 비교법적 연구, "한정미", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2006)
- 황남석, "주식회사 분할의 과세에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2010), 有斐閣
- 奈良輝久ほか, "M&A法制の羅針盤" (2007), 靑林書院
- 大石篤史ほか, "三角合倂の實務對應に伴う法的諸問題", 商事法務, (1802) (2007)
- 藤田友敬, "國際會社法の諸問題(下)", 商事法務, (1674) (2003)
- 武井一浩, "企業買收防衛戰略", 商事法務 (2004)
- 森本滋, "会社法における株主平等原則", 商事法務, (1825) (2008)
- 相澤哲, "合倂等代價の柔軟化の實現とそ經緯", のマール (2007)
- 相澤哲ほか, "合倂等對價の柔軟化の施行に伴う", 商事法務, (1800) (2007)
- 葉玉匡美, "議決權制限株式を利用した買收防衛策", 商事法務, (1743) (2005)
- 荻野敦史, "三角合倂に関する實務上の問題點と買收防衛策としての活用", マール (2007)
- James D. Cox, "Corporations Volume Ⅱ" (2003), Aspen Publisher
- Booth, "The Promise of State Takeover Statutes", Mich. L. Rev, 86, pp.1671~ (1988)
