본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독점규제법상의 손해배상제도에 관한 연구

A Study on Damages Actions of Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act §56 is if an enterpriser violates the provisions of the Act, and thereby inflicts on a person any damage, he shall be liable for compensation of such damage to the person. And Provided, that if enterpriser prove himself that he did not intend to make any faults and there is no mistake, this is not the case. The antitrust law is enforced both public and private enforcement. But the korean antitrust law enforcement largely depends on public enforcement by Korean Fair Trade Commission. Recently a damages actions are on the increase and the process to file a suit becomes more easy by the revision of korean antitrust law in 2004. The objective of this paper is to improve the legal conditions for victims to execise their right to reparation of all damalge suffered as a result of a breach of KFTA.

Abstract

Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act §56 is if an enterpriser violates the provisions of the Act, and thereby inflicts on a person any damage, he shall be liable for compensation of such damage to the person. And Provided, that if enterpriser prove himself that he did not intend to make any faults and there is no mistake, this is not the case. The antitrust law is enforced both public and private enforcement. But the korean antitrust law enforcement largely depends on public enforcement by Korean Fair Trade Commission. Recently a damages actions are on the increase and the process to file a suit becomes more easy by the revision of korean antitrust law in 2004. The objective of this paper is to improve the legal conditions for victims to execise their right to reparation of all damalge suffered as a result of a breach of KFTA.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김구년, "독점규제법상의 손해배상청구", 경제법연구, 5(2) (2006), 한국경제법학회
  2. 공정거래법 및 소비자관련법상 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입방안 연구, "김두진", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
  3. 김두진, "독점규제법에 의한 손해배상의 私訴의 활성화", 비교사법, 11(4), pp.331~366 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  4. 김영갑, "독점규제법상의 손해배상책임", 저스티스, 30(4) (1997), 한국법학원
  5. 김차동, "공정거래법상의 사적 집행제도의 변경 및 그 보완방안", 경쟁법연구, 11 (2005), 한국경쟁법학회
  6. 김회경, "독점규제법 위반행위에 대한 손해배상청구", 법학연구, 10 (2001), 경상대학교
  7. 양창수, "독점규제법에서의 손해배상", 민법연구, 5 (2006), 박영사
  8. 윤보옥, "미국독점금지법(Ⅰ)" (2004), 삼지원
  9. 윤태영, "경쟁질서 위반행위에 대한 불법행위책임", 경제법연구, 5(2) (2006), 한국경제법학회
  10. 이기종, "독점규제법위반행위에 대한 공정거래위원회의 시정조치와 법원의 손해배상판결의 관계", 상사판례연구, 8 (1997), 한국상사판례학회
  11. 장승화, "독점규제법상 금지청구와 손해배상청구", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 299 (2001), 대한변호사협회
  12. 장혜림, "獨占規制法 違反行爲者를 被告로 하는 間接購買者 損害賠償請求訴訟의 法的 問題", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.35~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  13. 장혜림, "獨占規制法 違反行爲者를 被告로 하는 間接購買者 損害賠償請求訴訟의 法的 問題", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.35~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  14. 홍대식, "공정거래법상 손해배상청구 - 실무의 관점에서-", 경영법률, 13(2) (2003), 한국경영법률학회
  15. 홍대식, "카르텔로 인한 손해액의 산정: 이론과 실제", 비교사법, 14(3), pp.1101~1136 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  16. 홍춘의, "독점규제법위반행위와 손해배상책임", 기업법연구, 5 (2000), 한국기업법학회
  17. 金井貴嗣, "ケースブック獨占禁止法" (2007), 弘文堂
  18. 佐藤一雄, "米國獨占禁止法", 信山社 (2005)
  19. 泉水文雄, "獨占禁止法と損害賠償", 民商法雜誌, 124(4) (2001), 有斐閣
  20. 村上政博, "독점금지법의 시행절차 및 집행", 일본의 경쟁정책 (2000), FKI미디어
  21. 村上政博, "獨占禁止法と差止·損害賠償」(第2版)" (2005), 商事法務
  22. GREEN PAPER Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM(2005) 672 final, "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES", ~ (2005)
  23. WHITE PAPER on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, COM(2008) 165 final, "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES", ~ (2008)
  24. Denis Waelbroeck, "Study on the conditions of claims for damages in case of infringement of EC competition rules" (2004), Ashurst
  25. Lawrence A. Sullivan, "THE LAW OF ANTITRUST, 2nd ed." (2006), Thomson and West

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)