공정거래법 위반행위에 대한 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입방안
A Study on the Introduction of Punitive Damages
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean National Assembly revised the Fair Subcontract Transactions Act to introduce treble damages for the accusation of the forced transfer of technology in 2011. Now, the Korean Fair Trade Commission is considering to propose the bill to stipulate treble damages on the violation of the Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter, ‘MRFTA’). Because the Korean legal system belongs to the civil law, many Korean scholars and lawyers have negative opinions on the punitive damages. But, the public enforcement of the MRFTA by the Korean FTC has not been so effective to deter the violation. Then some insists on the introduction of treble damages to reinforce the inefficient public enforcement. To legislate the treble damages successfully, several considerations such as the corelation to the compensatory damages, the statutory requirements of the new treble damages, the possibility of unconstitutionality, etc. should be reviewed. Even if there may be some unbalance in the legal system, the introduction of treble damages will put positive impact on the optimal control to the violation of the MRFTA.
Abstract
The Korean National Assembly revised the Fair Subcontract Transactions Act to introduce treble damages for the accusation of the forced transfer of technology in 2011. Now, the Korean Fair Trade Commission is considering to propose the bill to stipulate treble damages on the violation of the Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter, ‘MRFTA’). Because the Korean legal system belongs to the civil law, many Korean scholars and lawyers have negative opinions on the punitive damages. But, the public enforcement of the MRFTA by the Korean FTC has not been so effective to deter the violation. Then some insists on the introduction of treble damages to reinforce the inefficient public enforcement. To legislate the treble damages successfully, several considerations such as the corelation to the compensatory damages, the statutory requirements of the new treble damages, the possibility of unconstitutionality, etc. should be reviewed. Even if there may be some unbalance in the legal system, the introduction of treble damages will put positive impact on the optimal control to the violation of the MRFTA.
참고문헌 (24)
- 권오승, "소비자보호법, 제5판" (2005), 법문사
- 권오승, "경제법, 제9판" (2011), 법문사
- 김동훈, "독점규제법상 3배손해배상제도 도입의 필요성", 비교법학연구 (2005)
- 김재국, "징벌적 손해배상", 민사법연구, 3 (1996)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회 기획추진단, "징벌적 배상제도 참고자료", ~ (2006)
- 윤정환, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 9(1) (1992)
- 징벌적 손해배상의 도입방안, "이점인", 동아대학교 지식자원개발센타, ~ (2005)
- 정환, "하도급법상 3배 배상제도에 대한 비판적 검토, In 기업정책시리즈 4" (2011), 전국경제인연합회
- 정호열, "경제법 제4판" (2012), 박영사
- 이기수, "경제법, 제8판" (2009), 세창출판사
- Report and Recommendations, "Antitrust Modernization Commission", ~ (2007)
- Dautghety, Andrew F., "Found Money Split-Award Statues and Settlement of Punitive Damages Cases", American Law and Economics, 5, pp.134~ (2003)
- Henderson, Jr., "The Torts Process, 5th ed" (1999), Aspen Law&Business
- Williams, G., "Foundation of Law of Tort, 2nd ed" (1984), Butterworths
- Hovenkamp, Herbert, "Antitrust’s Protected Classes", Mich. L. Rev, 88, pp.1~ (1989)
- Morris, "Punitive Damages in Tort Cases", Harv. L. Rev, 44, pp.1176~ (1912)
- Neale, "The Antitrust Laws of the United States of America" (1980), Cambridge University Press
- Prosser, W., "Handbook of the Law of Torts, 4th ed" (1971), Little, Brown & Co
- Sharkey, Catherine M., "Punitive Damages as Societal Damages", Yale Law Journal, 113, pp.347~ (2003)
- Sedgwick, "Measures of Damages, 9th ed" (1912)
- Theorelli, H., "The Federal Antitrust Policy", ~ (1955)
- Vold, L., "Are Threefold Damages under the Antitrust Act Penal or Compensatory?", Ky. L. J, 28, pp.118~ (1940)
- Wheeler, M. E., "The Constitutional Case for Reforming Punitive Damages Procedures", Virginia L. Rev, 69, pp.269~ (1983)
- Ysewyn, Johan, "Private Enforcement of Competition Law in the EU", ~ (2005)