Opacity and Implicational Universal in the Developmental Phonology of English
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses Prince & Smolensky’s (1993/2004) argument that implicational universals emerge from certain universally fixed constraint-hierarchies, focusing on the developmental phonology of English. In this paper, two different types of opaque error patterns observed in the developmental phonology of English, described and analyzed by Dinnsen (2008), are reconsidered in terms of the implicational universal existing between errors involving manner features and errors involving place features. This reconsideration shows that in choosing opaque actual forms as optimal outputs in these cases it is indispensable to set up the constraint-hierarchy that is opposite to the expected one for the implicational universal. This paper, therefore, demonstrates that opacity may make it impossible to formalize an implicational universal as a universally fixed constraint-hierarchy. It leads to the conclusion that not every implicational universal always gets along with the universally fixed constraint-hierarchy. (Chung-Ang University)
Abstract
This paper discusses Prince & Smolensky’s (1993/2004) argument that implicational universals emerge from certain universally fixed constraint-hierarchies, focusing on the developmental phonology of English. In this paper, two different types of opaque error patterns observed in the developmental phonology of English, described and analyzed by Dinnsen (2008), are reconsidered in terms of the implicational universal existing between errors involving manner features and errors involving place features. This reconsideration shows that in choosing opaque actual forms as optimal outputs in these cases it is indispensable to set up the constraint-hierarchy that is opposite to the expected one for the implicational universal. This paper, therefore, demonstrates that opacity may make it impossible to formalize an implicational universal as a universally fixed constraint-hierarchy. It leads to the conclusion that not every implicational universal always gets along with the universally fixed constraint-hierarchy. (Chung-Ang University)
참고문헌 (16)
- Dinnsen, Daniel, "Typology of Opacity Effects in Acquisition, in : Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders", pp.121~176 (2008), Equinox
- Dinnsen, Daniel, "Typological Predictions in Developmental Phonology", Journal of Child Language, 28, pp.597~628 (2001)
- Dinnsen, Daniel, "Implicationally Related Error Patterns and the Selection of Treatment Targets", Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, pp.257~270 (2001)
- Greenberg, Joseph, "Typology and Cross-linguistic Generalizations, in : Universals of Grammar (vol. 1)", pp.33~59 (1978), Stanford University Press
- 김선회, "B » PREC(A, B)의 비범어성: 영어 음운습득 사례의 후보연쇄 최적성 이론적 분석을 중심으로", 영어영문학연구, 51(2), pp.39~62 (2009), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Łubowicz, Anna, "Derived Environment Effects in Optimality Theory", Lingua, 112, pp.243~280 (2002)
- McCarthy,John, "A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- McCarthy, John, "Comparative Markedness", Theoretical Linguistics, 29, pp.1~51 (2003)
- McCarthy,John, "Gen, Eval, and Phonological Opacity, in : Lecture Notes for Indiana PhonologyFest 2006" (2006), Indiana University
- McCarthy, John, "Hidden Generalizations: Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory" (2007), Equinox
- Prosodic Morphology: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction, "McCarthy, John", Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, ~ (1993)
- "Arguing Optimality"[URL]
- Prince, Alan, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (1993), Blackwell
- "On the Structure of the Constraint Component Con of UG"[URL]
- Smolensky, Paul, "On the Comprehension", Production Dilemma in Child Language, 1996, pp.27, 720~731
- Tesar, Bruce, "arnability in Optimality Theory (Technical Report JHU-CogSci-96-3). Baltimore, MD: Department of Cognitive Science" (1996), Johns Hopkins University