피보험자의 서면동의 철회 입법에 관한 검토
A Review on Legislation of the Withdrawal to the Written Consent by the Insured
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Commercial act art.731 provides that a contract of insurance which covers the death of a third person as an insured event shall require the written consent of the third person at the same time as the insurance contract is concluded. This provision also can be applied if the rights arising from the contract of insurance have been transferred to the person other than the insured, and mutatis mutandis to the designation and change of the beneficiary. A purpose of the legislation is to prevent moral risk, infringement of personal rights, and gambling of insurance contract. Many countries’ insurance contract law adopts this rule but do not enact whether the insured have the power to withdraw the consent or not. According to the common view, it might be interpretated that the insured can withdraw the consent before it gets concluded, but cannot withdraw consent of the concluded contract without the consents of the policyholder and beneficiary. However, the Supreme Court Decision (2011Da81190, 81206 decided on September 14, 2013) reached an opposite conclusion. Only Japanese insurance Act has a provision (§37,) to solve this issue. The writer introduce the content of the concerned provisions and legal issues and expect to lively discussion in our academia
Abstract
Commercial act art.731 provides that a contract of insurance which covers the death of a third person as an insured event shall require the written consent of the third person at the same time as the insurance contract is concluded. This provision also can be applied if the rights arising from the contract of insurance have been transferred to the person other than the insured, and mutatis mutandis to the designation and change of the beneficiary. A purpose of the legislation is to prevent moral risk, infringement of personal rights, and gambling of insurance contract. Many countries’ insurance contract law adopts this rule but do not enact whether the insured have the power to withdraw the consent or not. According to the common view, it might be interpretated that the insured can withdraw the consent before it gets concluded, but cannot withdraw consent of the concluded contract without the consents of the policyholder and beneficiary. However, the Supreme Court Decision (2011Da81190, 81206 decided on September 14, 2013) reached an opposite conclusion. Only Japanese insurance Act has a provision (§37,) to solve this issue. The writer introduce the content of the concerned provisions and legal issues and expect to lively discussion in our academia
참고문헌 (46)
- 김성태, "보험법강론" (2001), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법(하)" (2000), 법문사
- 김선정, "타인의 생명보험계약", 보험학회지, 47 (1993)
- 김선정, "생명보험계약상 피보험이익에 관한 연구", 보험학회지, 49 (1997)
- 김선정, "보험수익자의 개입권에 관한 연구", 보험학회지, (81), pp.101~133 (2008), 한국보험학회
- 김선정, "일본의 보험법개정과 시사점 - 총론과 공통규정을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 28(4), pp.9~51 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 김정호, "상법강의(하), 제 2 판" (2005), 法文社
- 김철호, "생명보험에서의 피보험이익에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2011
- 박세민, "보험법" (2013), 박영사
- 서헌제, "상법강의(하)" (2004), 법문사
- 손주찬, "상법(하)" (2005), 박영사
- 이기수, "보험ㆍ해상법" (2008), 박영사
- 양승규, "보험법" (2004), 삼지원
- 유관우, "인보험약관해석" (2006), 엘림G&P
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 정경영, "상법학강의" (2007), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(하)" (2000), 법문사
- 정진세, "“타인의 사망보험과 피보험자의 동의”, 정진세교수정년기념", 「상사법연구」, 간행위원회, ~ (2001)
- 최기원, "상법학신론(하)" (2004), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험ㆍ해상ㆍ항공운송법" (2013), 삼영사
- 조지현, "타인의 생명보험계약의 추인－ 피보험자의 추인 및 무효인 보험에서의 법적 문제점을 중심으로", 상사법연구, 26(2), pp.43~63 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 채이식, "상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 甘利公人, "保險法の論点と展望" (2009), 商事法務
- 江頭憲治朗, "保險法改正の論点" (2009), 法律文化社
- 菊池直人, "生命保險における被保險者の法的地位について-他人の生命の保險契約を中心として-", 生命保險論集, (159) (2007)
- 菊池直人, "生命保險における被保險者の同意について", 生命保險論集, (174) (2011)
- 嶋寺基, "被保險者の解除請求に關する一考察", 金融法務事情, (1898) (2010)
- 大串淳子, "解說保險法" (2008), 弘文堂
- 大森忠夫, "保險法" (1985), 有斐閣
- 米山高生, "保險理論からみた保險法 -契約自由の世界からの離脫", 保險學雜誌, (608) (2010)
- 福田弥夫, "改正保險法における今後の課題について", 保險學雜誌, (613) (2011)
- 福田弥夫, "逐條解說改正保險法" (2008), ぎょうせい
- 本間照光, "日本における「他人の生命の保險」100年-現行通說の學說史上の位置-", 保險學雜誌, (588) (2005)
- 山野嘉朗, "現代保險ㆍ海商法30講" (1997), 中央經濟社
- 山下友信, "保險法" (2005), 有斐閣
- 西島梅治, "保險法" (1983), 筑摩書房
- 石山卓磨, "現代保險法" (2011), 成文堂
- 野口タ子, "他人の生命保險契約ㆍ傷害疾病定額保險契約における被保險者同意不要類型", 保險學雜誌, (607) (2009)
- 日本生命保險 生命保險硏究會, "生命保險の法務と實務" (2004), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 遠山優治, "他人の生命ㆍ身體の保險契約について", 生命保險論集, (160) (2007)
- 田辺康平, "現代保險法" (1985), 文眞堂
- 洲崎博史, "保險法解說" (2010), 有斐閣
- 萩本修, "保險法立法關係資料", 別冊商事法務, (321) (2008), 商事法務
- 萩本修, "新しい保險法" (2008), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 村田敏一, "新保險法の總論的課題について-契約類型間の規律の相異点と,規律の性格問題を中心に-", 保險學雜誌, (608) (2010)
- 靑谷和夫, "全訂保險契約法論Ⅰ(生命保險)" (1982), 千倉書房