본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성

Psychometric properties of an instrument 2: structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance

2

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance has rarely been evaluated. It is recommended for Korean nursing researchers to evaluate the internal structure of instruments using a greater variety of methods, such as item response t

Abstract

Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance has rarely been evaluated. It is recommended for Korean nursing researchers to evaluate the internal structure of instruments using a greater variety of methods, such as item response t

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Lidwine B. Mokkink, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), pp.737~745 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. de Vet HCW, "Measurement in medicine: a practical guide", pp.338~ (2011), Cambridge University Press
  3. Polit DF, "Measurement and the measurement of change", pp.350~ (2016), Wolters Kluwer
  4. Eun-Hyun Lee, "A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 88, pp.1~8 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Byrne BM, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming", pp.86~89 (2016), Routledge
  6. K. V. Mardia, "Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications", Biometrika, 57(3), pp.519~ (1970), JSTOR[DOI]
  7. Li‐tze Hu, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  8. Robert C. MacCallum, "Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.", Psychological Methods, 1(2), pp.130~149 (1996), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  9. Lee EH, "Psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes", Int J Endocrinol, 2015, pp.780701~ (2015)[DOI]
  10. Hair JF, "Multivariate data analysis", pp.600~638 (2014), Pearson
  11. 이은현, "The 21-Item and 12-Item Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Psychometric Evaluation in a Korean Population", Asian Nursing Research, 13(1), pp.30~37 (2019), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  12. Chen Huifang, "The Core Knowledge and Skills of Nursing Competency Regarding Mealtime Assistance for Hemiplegic Patients in China", Asian Nursing Research, 14(2), pp.129~135 (2020), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  13. Claes Fornell, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  14. 이은현, "Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments", Asian Nursing Research, 14(5), pp.267~276 (2020), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  15. Jinhua Zhang, "Development and Validation of the Humanistic Practice Ability of Nursing Scale", Asian Nursing Research, 15(2), pp.105~112 (2021), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  16. Furr RM, "Psychometrics: an introduction", pp.401~4710 (2018), Sage
  17. G. F. Kuder, "The theory of the estimation of test reliability", Psychometrika, 2(3), pp.151~160 (1937), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  18. Linacre JM, "Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide" (2019), Winsteps.com
  19. Doris Sau‐Fung Yu, "Cross‐cultural applicability of the Self‐Care Self‐Efficacy Scale in a multi‐national study", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(2), pp.681~692 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
  20. Rapson Gomez, "Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor Structure and Test-Retest Invariance, and Temporal Stability and Uniqueness of Latent Factors in Older Adults", Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(2), pp.308~317 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  21. Emilie Bundgaard Lindkvist, "A Danish version of self-efficacy in diabetes self-management: A valid and reliable questionnaire affected by age and sex", Pediatric Diabetes, 19(3), pp.544~552 (2018), Wiley[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)