본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 3: 수렴, 판별, 집합 및 준거타당도

Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.

Abstract

Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Lidwine B. Mokkink, "The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), pp.737~745 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. Eun-Hyun Lee, "A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 88, pp.1~8 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Lee EH, "Psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes", Int J Endocrinol, 2015, pp.780701~ (2015)[DOI]
  4. 이은현, "Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments", Asian Nursing Research, 14(5), pp.267~276 (2020), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  5. de Vet HCW, "Measurement in medicine: a practical guide" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  6. Jiyeon Lee, "Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 105, pp.103498~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Polit DF, "Measurement and the measurement of change" (2015), Wolters Kluwer
  8. Eun-Hyun Lee, "Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes", Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), pp.77~ (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  9. Robert A. Arbuckle, "Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)—A Measure of Symptom Distress", Value in Health, 12(8), pp.1168~1175 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  10. L. B. Mokkink, "COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures", Quality of Life Research, 27(5), pp.1171~1179 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  11. Lee EH, "Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 14(1), pp.22~ (2016)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)