본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

百濟 武王의 出系와 王位繼承

Being Heir and Succession to the Throne of King Muwang in Baekje

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

King Muwang is regarded as a figure who accomplished the political stability and the consolidation of kingship. In this study, I try to shed a new light on his becoming heir and succession to the throne based on newly discovered materials, which issue was heatedly debated in academia. I reexamined the issue of heirship whether he was the son of king Bubwang or whether he was born from Jiryong based on the inscription excavated from the temple site of Wangheung and also scrutinized the context of his succession to the throne and his political supporter groups in details. King Muwang seems to have been the legitimate and firstborn child of a ‘dead prince’, considering the inscription of the sarira reliquary of the Wangheung temple site and the relation of King Muwang to Wangheung temple. This is congruent to the story that the father of King Muwang was Jiryong and he lived with his single mother. Moreover, the reason why King Muwang resided in Iksan area not in the capital of Baekje was that the prince, the father of King Muwang and also the legitimate and firstborn heir of King Wideok died and the political power was took by Hye; therefore, the prospective heir, King Muwang could have been expelled or could have escaped to save his life. While in his exile, King Muwang could build political bases by getting married to a strong family in Iksan area. After the enthronement of King Hyewang, he passed away immediately and his firstborn heir, King Bubwang succeeded to the throne. However, he did not belong to the direct lineage of King Sungwang and he faced much opposition from the direct royal family members of King Wideok and the group strongly opposed to Silla. Thereby, King Muwang was enthroned after the abdication of King Bubwang by the abovementioned group. The political supporting groups of King Muwang comprised of the direct royal family of King Wideok, a strong family in Iksan due to the marriage, Buddhist group in Iksan area, and some prominent aristocrats. Among the royal family members, Ajwa and Boksin, the direct family members of King Wideokwang are conspicuous. Local groups and Buddhist group in Iksan area played important roles in the enthronement of King Muwang. Moreover, among prominent aristocrats, the group who were strongly opposed to Silla since the reign of King Sungwang would have supported King Muwang. They are presumed to have family names such as HaeandYeon. In addition, other groups could have supported King Muwang. However, the family of Sa is not likely to have contributed to the enthronement of King Muwang although the Queen having the familyname, Sa, existed. On the contrary, at the later stage of King Muwang’sreign, the family, Sa, could have held important office sand mean while a member of Sa family could have become a wife for King Muwang. In conclusion, the enthronement of King Muwang was possible due to his legitimacy as the firstborn heir of a ‘dead prince’ and moreover wide range supports of direct royal family members of King Wideok, local powers of Iksan area, some prominent aristocrats and Buddhist groups.

Abstract

King Muwang is regarded as a figure who accomplished the political stability and the consolidation of kingship. In this study, I try to shed a new light on his becoming heir and succession to the throne based on newly discovered materials, which issue was heatedly debated in academia. I reexamined the issue of heirship whether he was the son of king Bubwang or whether he was born from Jiryong based on the inscription excavated from the temple site of Wangheung and also scrutinized the context of his succession to the throne and his political supporter groups in details. King Muwang seems to have been the legitimate and firstborn child of a ‘dead prince’, considering the inscription of the sarira reliquary of the Wangheung temple site and the relation of King Muwang to Wangheung temple. This is congruent to the story that the father of King Muwang was Jiryong and he lived with his single mother. Moreover, the reason why King Muwang resided in Iksan area not in the capital of Baekje was that the prince, the father of King Muwang and also the legitimate and firstborn heir of King Wideok died and the political power was took by Hye; therefore, the prospective heir, King Muwang could have been expelled or could have escaped to save his life. While in his exile, King Muwang could build political bases by getting married to a strong family in Iksan area. After the enthronement of King Hyewang, he passed away immediately and his firstborn heir, King Bubwang succeeded to the throne. However, he did not belong to the direct lineage of King Sungwang and he faced much opposition from the direct royal family members of King Wideok and the group strongly opposed to Silla. Thereby, King Muwang was enthroned after the abdication of King Bubwang by the abovementioned group. The political supporting groups of King Muwang comprised of the direct royal family of King Wideok, a strong family in Iksan due to the marriage, Buddhist group in Iksan area, and some prominent aristocrats. Among the royal family members, Ajwa and Boksin, the direct family members of King Wideokwang are conspicuous. Local groups and Buddhist group in Iksan area played important roles in the enthronement of King Muwang. Moreover, among prominent aristocrats, the group who were strongly opposed to Silla since the reign of King Sungwang would have supported King Muwang. They are presumed to have family names such as HaeandYeon. In addition, other groups could have supported King Muwang. However, the family of Sa is not likely to have contributed to the enthronement of King Muwang although the Queen having the familyname, Sa, existed. On the contrary, at the later stage of King Muwang’sreign, the family, Sa, could have held important office sand mean while a member of Sa family could have become a wife for King Muwang. In conclusion, the enthronement of King Muwang was possible due to his legitimacy as the firstborn heir of a ‘dead prince’ and moreover wide range supports of direct royal family members of King Wideok, local powers of Iksan area, some prominent aristocrats and Buddhist groups.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 노중국, "삼국유사 무왕조의 재검토", 한국전통문화연구, (2), pp.6~11 (1986)
  2. 김주성, "백제 사비시대 정치사 연구", 박사, pp.1990
  3. "무왕의 권력강화와 익산경영", 백제문화사대계연구총서 5, ~ (2007)
  4. 유원재, "백제 무왕의 익산경영", 백제문화, (25) (1996)
  5. 김수태, "백제 무왕대의 정치세력", 마한 백제문화, (14) (1999)
  6. "백제 무왕과 그의 시대", 공주대 백제문화연구소, ~ (2005)
  7. 원광대 마한·백제문화연구소, "대발견 사리장엄 미륵사의 재조명", 학술회의자료집 (2009)
  8. 한국사상사학회, "익산 미륵사와 백제 불교", 한국사상사학회 월례학술발표회 (2009)
  9. 신라사학회, "익산 미륵사지 출토 유물에 대한 종합", ~ (2009)
  10. 고려사학회, "익산 백제 미륵사지의 재발견", 학술회의자료집 (2009)
  11. 사재동, "서동설화연구", pp.906~ (1971), 지헌영교수화갑기념논총
  12. 사재동, "무강왕전설의 연구", 백제연구, (5), pp.91~101 (1974)
  13. 坂元義種, "中國史書からみに百濟王とその系譜", pp.113~114 (1978), 百濟史の硏究
  14. 이기백, "백제 왕위계승고", 역사학보, (11), pp.17~ (1959)
  15. 笠井倭人, "中國史書による百濟王統譜", 日本書紀硏究, (8), pp.37~39 (1975)
  16. 나종우, "백제사상에 있어서 익산의 위치", 백제문화, 26, pp.108~110 (1997)
  17. 김수태, "백제 법왕대의 불교", 선사와 고대, 15, pp.22~23 (2000)
  18. 박현숙, "백제 무왕의 익산 경영과 미륵사`in익산 백제 미륵사지의 재발견", 고려사학회 학술회의자료집, pp.34~ (2009)
  19. 김영태, "미륵사 창건 연기설화고", 마한 백제문화, 1, pp.89~90 (1975)
  20. 이도학, "백제 무왕의 계보와 집권기반`in백제 무왕과 그의 시대", 학술요지문, pp.18~ (2005)
  21. 노중국, "백제 정치사연구", 192~197 (1994)
  22. 강종원, "백제말기 정치상황과 익산 왕궁성", 마한·백제문화, 17, pp.190~ (2007)
  23. 문안식, "의자왕 집권초기의 친위정변과 국정쇄신", 동국사학회 3차월례발표회 자료집, pp.8~9 (2009)
  24. 김주성, "백제 무왕의 즉위과정과 익산", 마한·백제문화, 17, pp.214~ (2007)
  25. 이도학, "<王興寺址 舍利器 銘文> 分析을 통해 본 百濟 威德王代의 政治와 佛敎", 한국사연구, (142), pp.1~31 (2008), 한국사연구회
  26. "부여 왕흥사지 출토 사리기의 의미", 국립부여문화재연구소, ~ (2008)
  27. 양기석, "百濟 王興寺의 創建과 變遷", 백제문화, 2(41), pp.35~61 (2009), 백제문화연구소
  28. 김수태, "백제 위덕왕대 부여 능산리사원의 창건", 백제문화, (27), pp.42~45 (1998)
  29. "왕흥사지 Ⅲ", 국립부여문화재연구소, 142~150 (2009)
  30. 양기석, "위덕왕의 즉위와 집권세력의 변화", 백제문화사대계 연구총서, (5), pp.165~ (2007)
  31. 길기태, "왕흥사지 사리함 명문을 통해 본 백제불교", 한국사 시민강좌, 44, pp.159~164 (2009)
  32. 이종욱, "미륵사의 창건연기", pp.23~ (1989), 문화재관리국 문화재연구소
  33. 강민식, "서동설화의 생성과 전개", 선사와 고대, (19), pp.370~ (2003)
  34. 김달수, "일본속의 한국문화를 찾아서" (1997), 대원사
  35. 김영태, "백제불교사상연구", 261~285 (1985)
  36. 김수태, "백제 무왕대의 대신라 관계", 백제문화, 1(42), pp.61~93 (2010), 백제문화연구소
  37. 노중국, "익산지역 정치체의 사적 전개와 백제사상의 익산세력", 마한·백제문화, (15), pp.27~32 (2001)
  38. 노중국, "삼국유사 무왕조의 재검토", 한국전통문화연구, (2), pp.16~19 (1986)
  39. 강종원, "백제말기 정치상황과 익산 왕궁성", 191~ (2007)
  40. 김주성, "백제 무왕의 정국운영", 신라사학보, (16), pp.261~286 (2009), 신라사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)