백제 무왕대 익산 토착세력과 불교세력의 역할
Roles of the Indigenous and Buddhist Forces of Ik-san Region under the Reign of King Mu in the Baekje
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is well known that King Mu(武王), the 30th king of the Baekje, was born and grew in Ik-san, and ascended the throne. This showed that his coronation was not the normal succession to the throne, but the abnormal course through his crowning king on the basis of the support of particular forces. For his enthronement, follow forces based on the particular foundation were variously connected and their strong bond interacted. The most important force in them was a series of power on basis of Ik-san and his powerful support might. As reflected in Seo-dong's Tale(薯童說話), Ik-san forces, relatives on his mother´s side, had a profound effect on him. The next force was Buddhist one that was represented as Ji-myung Monk(知命法師) relevant to the establishment of Mi-reuk-sa(彌勒寺). As shown by the establishment after his enthronement, it is certain that Buddhist forces acted as regular part for his enthronement. At that time, there were Sa-ja-sa(師子寺), Je-seok-sa(帝釋寺) and Seok-bul-sa(石佛寺) and others in Ik-san. For his enthronement, their Buddhist forces played direct and indirect part in the establishment in order to secure his justifiability of the enthronement. Among them, Ji-myung Monk, the most representative of Ik-san region, played an important role in connection with Mi-reuk-sa's establishment in order to secure his justifiability of the enthronement. He acted as regular part in the growth process of king Mu and so entered into a relations between master and pupil. He played an considerable role in many sections including education. Also, he gathered the indigenous Buddhist forces in favor of the King and had an effect on enthronement and establishment. Given those facts, It showed that the indigenous and Buddhist forces of Ik-san played an important role in connection with enthronement. That is to say, these role in order to secure the king's legitimacy and justifiability of the enthronement was certainly crucial in the kingdom. So He secured his legitimacy with Maitreya belief through establishment
Abstract
It is well known that King Mu(武王), the 30th king of the Baekje, was born and grew in Ik-san, and ascended the throne. This showed that his coronation was not the normal succession to the throne, but the abnormal course through his crowning king on the basis of the support of particular forces. For his enthronement, follow forces based on the particular foundation were variously connected and their strong bond interacted. The most important force in them was a series of power on basis of Ik-san and his powerful support might. As reflected in Seo-dong's Tale(薯童說話), Ik-san forces, relatives on his mother´s side, had a profound effect on him. The next force was Buddhist one that was represented as Ji-myung Monk(知命法師) relevant to the establishment of Mi-reuk-sa(彌勒寺). As shown by the establishment after his enthronement, it is certain that Buddhist forces acted as regular part for his enthronement. At that time, there were Sa-ja-sa(師子寺), Je-seok-sa(帝釋寺) and Seok-bul-sa(石佛寺) and others in Ik-san. For his enthronement, their Buddhist forces played direct and indirect part in the establishment in order to secure his justifiability of the enthronement. Among them, Ji-myung Monk, the most representative of Ik-san region, played an important role in connection with Mi-reuk-sa's establishment in order to secure his justifiability of the enthronement. He acted as regular part in the growth process of king Mu and so entered into a relations between master and pupil. He played an considerable role in many sections including education. Also, he gathered the indigenous Buddhist forces in favor of the King and had an effect on enthronement and establishment. Given those facts, It showed that the indigenous and Buddhist forces of Ik-san played an important role in connection with enthronement. That is to say, these role in order to secure the king's legitimacy and justifiability of the enthronement was certainly crucial in the kingdom. So He secured his legitimacy with Maitreya belief through establishment
참고문헌 (36)
- "삼국지", ~
- "삼국사기", ~
- "삼국유사", ~
- "고려사", ~
- "세종실록", ~
- "신증동국여지승람", ~
- 강종원, "수촌리 백제고분군 조영세력 검토", 백제연구, (42), pp.39~60 (2005), 백제연구소
- 강종원, "百濟 武王의 出系와 王位繼承", 역사와 담론, (56), pp.3~37 (2010), 호서사학회
- 吉基泰, "彌勒寺 創建의 信仰的 性格", 한국사상사학, (30), pp.1~33 (2008), 한국사상사학회
- 김두진, "신라 중고시대의 미륵신앙", 한국학논총, 9 (1987), 국민대학교 한국학연구소
- 김삼룡, "지정학적인 측면에서 본 익산- 수로교통로를 중심으로-", 마한백제문화, 15 (2001), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 김상현, "백제 무왕대 불교계의 동향과 미륵사", 韓國史學報, (37), pp.7~31 (2009), 고려사학회
- 김선기, "여산유병덕박사화갑기념한국철학종교사상" (1990)
- 김선기, "發掘調査 成果를 통해 본 益山의 百濟 寺刹", 백제문화, 2(43), pp.159~193 (2010), 백제문화연구소
- 김수태, "백제 무왕대의 정치세력", 마한백제문화, 14 (1999), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 김수태, "백제 무왕대의 대신라 관계", 백제문화, 1(42), pp.61~93 (2010), 백제문화연구소
- 김원용, "익산지역의 청동기문화", 마한백제문화, 2 (1977), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 金周成, "百濟 사비時代 政治史 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1990
- 김주성, "백제 법왕과 무왕의 불교정책", 마한백제문화, 15 (2001), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 김주성, "백제 무왕의 즉위과정과 익산", 마한백제문화, 17 (2007), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 김주성, "7세기 각종 자료에 보이는 익산의 위상", 역사학연구, (36), pp.23~46 (2009), 호남사학회
- 김주성, "미륵사지 서탑 사리봉안기 출토에 따른 제설의 검토", 동국사학, (47), pp.27~54 (2009), 동국역사문화연구소
- 노중국, "백제 무왕과 지명법사", 한국사연구, 107 (1999), 한국사연구회
- 노중국, "익산지역 정치체의 사적 전개와 백제사상의 익산세력", 마한백제문화, 15 (2001), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 박현숙, "百濟 武王의 益山 경영과 彌勒寺", 韓國史學報, (36), pp.329~355 (2009), 고려사학회
- 유원재, "백제 무왕의 익산경영", 백제문화, (25), pp.53~65 (1996), 백제문화연구소
- 이병도, "한국고대사연구" (1976), 박영사
- 이현혜, "백제의 중앙과 지방" (1997), 충남대학교 백제연구소
- 장미애, "무왕의 세력기반으로서 익산의 위상과 의미", 한국고대사연구, (60), pp.159~196 (2010), 한국고대사학회
- 전영래, "금강유역 청동기문화권 신자료", 마한백제문화, 10 (1987), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 전영래, "금강유역 청동기문화권에 대한 관견", 마한백제문화, 16 (2004), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 정명호, "익산왕궁리성지발굴조사약보고", 마한백제문화, 2 (1977), 원광대학교 마한백제문화연구소
- 정재윤, "彌勒寺 舍利奉安記를 통해 본 武王・義慈王代의 政治的 動向", 韓國史學報, (37), pp.33~62 (2009), 고려사학회
- 조경철, "백제 무왕대 신도(神都) 건설과 미륵사(彌勒寺),제석사(帝釋寺) 창건", 백제문화, (39), pp.103~124 (2008), 백제문화연구소
- 주보돈, "미륵사지(彌勒寺址) 출토 사리봉안기(舍利奉安記)와 백제의 왕비(王妃)", 백제학보, (7), pp.31~55 (2012), 백제학회
- 최완규, "익산문화권 연구의 새로운 모색", 마한백제문화, 25 (2015), 원광대학교마한백제문화연구소
