본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교훈의 장르론적 의미와 교훈가사

A Generic Meaning of Didacticism and Didactic Gasa

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Didacticism of Gasa works is a factor relating to various steps or elements like the writer's intention, the work's content and structure, readers' reaction. The existing opinion which Gasa is a didactic genre was a logic to be tied to the category of monistic genre concept to excess. Gasa can be said as a genre fused into with a new category 'didactic' and existing generic categories. As a matter of fact, the theory that Gasa is a didactic genre is an opinion which recognizes or involves its complex generic attribute. There are some Gasa works singing instruction or didacticism in overwhelming weight. Those are the works strongly expressed theme of didacticism. However, Gasa works paraphrasing the items of didactic texts like Dongmong-Seonseup, Sohak are not simply moral texts. At the same time, Gasa works explaining the duties of married women are not simply didactic texts. It is certain that the situation inevitably to recite a poem putting into the contents of moral training shows up, putting on a lyric surface. Although the contents of instruction can be overwhelming in the aspect of importance, those Gasa works are different from Dongmong-Seonseup or Sohak. It is the reason that Gasa author's aesthetic intention is put in the work's style or form, and the space to insert author's inner mind is bigger than the didactic texts. Some senior scholars said that lyricism was predominant in Gasa works of the early Joseon dynasty, didactic Gasa works appeared on the stage in the late Joseon dynasty. Some scholars regard the lyricism as didacticism. However, those views are the products that they saw only one side. Gasa's complex generic attributes are involved in their opinions, we have to see it with a comprehensive viewpoint for grasping the whole aspect of Gasa genre. It is the reason that it is proper to synthesize them after dividing into inner and external categories, when we see it in the generic aspect. In that case, inner category is continuing disposition as durable instruction or didacticism, external category is disposition of diachronic change or synchronic variation. Either contents or themes, the case of outstanding didacticism is a result that instruction as an expressing factor sided with another instruction as a fundamental factor. A general basis of Gasa genre is didacticism to dwell in existent phenomena or recognized facts, categories of literary genres like 'lyric, epic, drama' are nothing but expressed aesthetic factors. It is worth considering intention of creation or theme though we understand the didactic Gasa works.

Abstract

Didacticism of Gasa works is a factor relating to various steps or elements like the writer's intention, the work's content and structure, readers' reaction. The existing opinion which Gasa is a didactic genre was a logic to be tied to the category of monistic genre concept to excess. Gasa can be said as a genre fused into with a new category 'didactic' and existing generic categories. As a matter of fact, the theory that Gasa is a didactic genre is an opinion which recognizes or involves its complex generic attribute. There are some Gasa works singing instruction or didacticism in overwhelming weight. Those are the works strongly expressed theme of didacticism. However, Gasa works paraphrasing the items of didactic texts like Dongmong-Seonseup, Sohak are not simply moral texts. At the same time, Gasa works explaining the duties of married women are not simply didactic texts. It is certain that the situation inevitably to recite a poem putting into the contents of moral training shows up, putting on a lyric surface. Although the contents of instruction can be overwhelming in the aspect of importance, those Gasa works are different from Dongmong-Seonseup or Sohak. It is the reason that Gasa author's aesthetic intention is put in the work's style or form, and the space to insert author's inner mind is bigger than the didactic texts. Some senior scholars said that lyricism was predominant in Gasa works of the early Joseon dynasty, didactic Gasa works appeared on the stage in the late Joseon dynasty. Some scholars regard the lyricism as didacticism. However, those views are the products that they saw only one side. Gasa's complex generic attributes are involved in their opinions, we have to see it with a comprehensive viewpoint for grasping the whole aspect of Gasa genre. It is the reason that it is proper to synthesize them after dividing into inner and external categories, when we see it in the generic aspect. In that case, inner category is continuing disposition as durable instruction or didacticism, external category is disposition of diachronic change or synchronic variation. Either contents or themes, the case of outstanding didacticism is a result that instruction as an expressing factor sided with another instruction as a fundamental factor. A general basis of Gasa genre is didacticism to dwell in existent phenomena or recognized facts, categories of literary genres like 'lyric, epic, drama' are nothing but expressed aesthetic factors. It is worth considering intention of creation or theme though we understand the didactic Gasa works.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 국어국문학회, "가사연구" (1997), 태학사
  2. 權寧徹, "民族文化論叢 11" (1990), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
  3. 김문기, "서민가사연구" (1983), 형설출판사
  4. 김유경, "<누항사>에 나타난 사실주의의 양상", 연세어문학, 24 (1992), 연세대 국어국문학과
  5. 김인겸, "일동장유가" (2007), 보고사
  6. 김학성, "가사의 장르성격 재론 In: 국문학의 탐구" (1987), 성균관대 출판부
  7. 박규홍, "<누항사> 소고 In: 벽송 이근후선생 화갑기념문집" (1985), 同刊行委員會
  8. 박연호, "가사문학 장르론" (2003), 도서출판 다운샘
  9. 박연호, "교훈가사 연구" (2003), 도서출판 다운샘
  10. 성기옥, "국문학 연구의 과제와 전망-국문학의 범위와 장르문제를 중심으로", 이화어문논집, 12 (1992), 이화여대 이화어문학회
  11. 성무경, "가사의 시학과 장르실현" (2000), 보고사
  12. 윤덕진, "조선조 長歌 가사의 연원과 맥락" (2008), 보고사
  13. 이상보, "한국고전시가연구▪속" (1984), 태학사
  14. 이상보, "17세기 가사전집" (1987), 교학연구사
  15. 장덕순, "국문학통론" (1963), 신구문화사
  16. 전일환, "朝鮮歌辭文學論" (1990), 계명문화사
  17. 鄭在晧, "한국가사문학론" (1982), 집문당
  18. 정재호, "註解 草堂問答歌" (1996), 박이정
  19. 조규익, "『송강가사 연구』Ⅰ-<관동별곡>론", 숭실어문, 16 (2000), 숭실어문학회
  20. 조규익, "봉건시대 민중의 저항과 고발문학 거창가" (2000), 월인
  21. 조규익, "고전시가의 변이와 지속" (2006), 학고방
  22. 조동일, "가사의 장르규정", 어문학, 22 (1969), 한국어문학회
  23. 조동일, "한국문학의 갈래 이론" (1992), 집문당
  24. 조윤제, "조선시가의 연구" (1948), 을유문화사
  25. 주종연, "가사의 장르고", 논문집, 3 (1971), 서울대 교양학부
  26. 주종연, "가사의 장르고 Ⅱ", 국어국문학, 62 (1973), 국어국문학회
  27. 주종연, "가사의 장르고 Ⅲ In: 국민대 논문집" (1978)
  28. 주종연, "한국고전문학 장르 연구" (1993), 한신문화사
  29. 최강현, "西往歌의 작자에 관한 연구", 아카데미 論叢, 2 (1974), 세계평화교수협의회
  30. 최영년, "속악유희" (2002), 범우사
  31. 한국고전연구회, "가사문학정해" (1983), 정동출판사
  32. E. 슈타이거, "詩學의 根本槪念" (1978), 삼중당
  33. 폴 헤르나디, "장르론-文學分類의 새 方法" (1985), 문장
  34. 볼프강 카이저, "언어예술작품론" (1984), 대방출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)