본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―

Classes of Shares and Defensive Measures

0

조회

0

다운로드

27

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

According to the Commercial Act, a company may issue classes of shares that differ in their contents with respect to the matters listed in the following items: (1) dividends of profits or interest, (2) distribution of residual assets. However, according to the amendments to the Commercial Act of 2008, the items including (3) any matters on which voting rights are exercisable at a shareholder’s meeting, (4) cancellation of shares using profits, and (5) a conversion of shares were added. The reason for this amendment is to give various financial ways to a company. In the result, both a golden stock and a share that differs in their contents with respect to the appointment of directors or corporate auditors at the meeting of shareholders of each class(including a meeting of shareholders jointly held with shareholders of any other class) are not introduced. It is because these classes of shares may be used as defensive measures. Basically, the classes of shares are not defensive measures. A defensive measure is only one of the various functions of the classes of shares. Even if the classes of shares are used as defensive measures, the classes of shares are necessary to add to the amendments to the Commercial Act. If an abuse of the classes of shares is restricted effectively, the introduction of the classes of shares in itself will be desirable from the viewpoint of corporate finance.

Abstract

According to the Commercial Act, a company may issue classes of shares that differ in their contents with respect to the matters listed in the following items: (1) dividends of profits or interest, (2) distribution of residual assets. However, according to the amendments to the Commercial Act of 2008, the items including (3) any matters on which voting rights are exercisable at a shareholder’s meeting, (4) cancellation of shares using profits, and (5) a conversion of shares were added. The reason for this amendment is to give various financial ways to a company. In the result, both a golden stock and a share that differs in their contents with respect to the appointment of directors or corporate auditors at the meeting of shareholders of each class(including a meeting of shareholders jointly held with shareholders of any other class) are not introduced. It is because these classes of shares may be used as defensive measures. Basically, the classes of shares are not defensive measures. A defensive measure is only one of the various functions of the classes of shares. Even if the classes of shares are used as defensive measures, the classes of shares are necessary to add to the amendments to the Commercial Act. If an abuse of the classes of shares is restricted effectively, the introduction of the classes of shares in itself will be desirable from the viewpoint of corporate finance.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 권재열, "적대적 M&A의 방어방법에 관한 연구 코협연구보고서 05-1", ~
  2. 권종호, "2006년 회사법개정시안의 주요내용 ― 자금조달관련사항을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.303~338 (2006), 한국상사법학회
  3. 김건식, "상법개(회사편)개정공청회" (2006), 법무부
  4. 김순석, "종류주식의 다양화와 자금조달의 유연성에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석, 주식법제개편(종류주식의 다양화)의 전망과 과제", 한국상사법학회 2008년 춘계학술대회 (2008)
  5. 김태진, "주주평등원칙에 관한 소고, 상법의 개정과 쟁점", 상사법학회·상사판례학회·기업법학회 하계공동학술대회 (2008)
  6. 박철영, "종류주식의 확대와 주주간 이해조정", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005)
  7. 송종준, "M&A법제의 현황과 보완과제" (2005), 한국상장회사협의회
  8. 李哲松, "회사법강의" (2008)
  9. 최문희, "독일의 주식회사관련법개정동향, 21세기 회사법개정의 논리" (2007), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  10. J. Cioffi, "Restructuring “Germany Inc.”: The Politics of Company and Takeover Law Reform in Germany and the European Union", Law & Policy, 24(4) (2002)
  11. M. Bennedsen, "The Impact of a Break-Through Rule on European Firms, Center for Economic and Business Discussion Paper", ~ (2002)
  12. M. Goergen, "Strong Managers and Passive Institutional Investors in UK"
  13. F. Barca, "The Control of Corporate Europe" (2001), Oxford
  14. Robert W. Hamilton, "Case and Materials on Corporations 8th ed" (2003)
  15. Sanford J. Grossman, "One share-one Vote and the Market for Corporate Control" (1988), 20 J. Fin. Econ
  16. Ballantine, "Califonia Corporation Laws, 4th ed"
  17. 相澤哲, "論点解?新?社法" (2006)
  18. 江頭憲治?, "株式?社法, 第2版" (2008)
  19. 江頭憲治?, "株式?係を中心に", 商事法務, 1758 (2006)
  20. 河村正幸, "新しい?社法制の理論と?務" (2006), 別冊金融商事判例
  21. 森本滋編著, "比較?社法?究?21世紀の?社法制を模索して" (2003), 商事法務
  22. 末永敏和, "株主平等の原則, 社法における主要論点の評" (2007)
  23. 棚橋元, "ベンチャ?企業と投資契約", ジュリスト, 1218
  24. 嶋浩二, "種類株式の上場制度に?する?討?況", 商事法務, 1800
  25. 森本滋, "?社法の下における株主平等原則", 商事法務, 1825 (2008)
  26. 葉玉匡美, "議決?制限株式を利用した買?防衛策", 商事法務, 1742 (2005)
  27. あずさ監査法人, "種類株式のガイドブック" (2007)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)