安錫儆의 思惟方式과 經世論에 관한 一考
The Study on Anseokgyeong's Theory of Statecraft and Method of Thinking
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to ascertain how the intellectual in the 18th century perceived reality and developed statecraft a little through Anseokgyeong's 「Uidae -jeongdaechaek: The policy for the palace courtyard」. In consequence, he showed the propensity to learning of '反覆精熟(Banbokjeongsuk): By repeating, To complete knowledge of and get into the swing of objects', as carrying on one-sided Naklon's academic traditions by Yigan and varying the other side of it starting with '人物性同論(Inmulseongdonglon): The theory that the nature of human is one with the objects'' As well as, he judged those days a civilized crisis, strengthened the ideal factor of 'civilization', and then stood at practical thinking to realize it. As a result, he understood those days' contradiction or evil as the code of it and searched for solution from a practical standpoint in 「Uidaejeongdaechaek」. He first gave weight to the role of the gentry and the king who was the main of governing related with settling some troubles. This is based on his perception that a upright governing is possible when the executive subject is perfect character in moral. Mainly it was brought up as a substitute when the role of the subject occupied an important part: educating public morals or a case connected with a king. Also, he denounced the discrepancy of the institute and made better it by reforming the whole or part occasionally. It is worthy of notice that he found the original settlement grounded on the democracy.
Abstract
This paper is to ascertain how the intellectual in the 18th century perceived reality and developed statecraft a little through Anseokgyeong's 「Uidae -jeongdaechaek: The policy for the palace courtyard」. In consequence, he showed the propensity to learning of '反覆精熟(Banbokjeongsuk): By repeating, To complete knowledge of and get into the swing of objects', as carrying on one-sided Naklon's academic traditions by Yigan and varying the other side of it starting with '人物性同論(Inmulseongdonglon): The theory that the nature of human is one with the objects'' As well as, he judged those days a civilized crisis, strengthened the ideal factor of 'civilization', and then stood at practical thinking to realize it. As a result, he understood those days' contradiction or evil as the code of it and searched for solution from a practical standpoint in 「Uidaejeongdaechaek」. He first gave weight to the role of the gentry and the king who was the main of governing related with settling some troubles. This is based on his perception that a upright governing is possible when the executive subject is perfect character in moral. Mainly it was brought up as a substitute when the role of the subject occupied an important part: educating public morals or a case connected with a king. Also, he denounced the discrepancy of the institute and made better it by reforming the whole or part occasionally. It is worthy of notice that he found the original settlement grounded on the democracy.
참고문헌 (13)
- "農巖集", ~
- "三淵集", ~
- "霅橋集", ~
- "悔窩集", ~
- 김준석, "조선후기 정사사상사 연구-국가재건론의 대두와 전개" (2003), 지식산업사
- 김준태, "잠곡 김육의 실용적 경세사상 연구", 유교사상연구, (31), pp.175~200 (2008), 한국유교학회
- 윤지훈, "悔窩 安重觀의 文學論에 대한 硏究", 漢文學報, 15(1), pp.317~342 (2006), 우리한문학회
- 윤지훈, "18세기 농암계 문인의 문학론과 비평에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 임형택, "문명의식과 실학" (2009), 돌베개
- 정옥자, "조선후기 조선중화사상 연구" (1998), 일지사
- 조성산, "조선후기 낙론계 학풍의 형성과 경세론 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 조성산, "18세기 洛論系 學脈의 변모양상 연구", 역사교육, (102), pp.63~95 (2007), 역사교육연구회
- 현상윤, "조선유학사" (1949), 민중서관
