본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Chong Yagyong's Political Philosophy: Kyongse Yup'yo and Mongmin Simso's Arguments on State Governance

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This article analyzes Chong Yagyong's political philosophy, especially his discussion on his ideal for righteous governance (wangjong C). Chong proposed new discourses on human nature and active governance in order to realize his ideal of wangjong. He further suggested an integration of the central and local governing systems. In this integrated system, magistrates would have the duty to educate their people and solve economic problems. Chong Yagyong's theory on governance by pyondung (辨等,discriminating between different social status groups), underlining the strict hierarchy of social status and a hierarchical social order, emerged in the process of explicating this system. He believed that the state's governing system could be maintained only when status hierarchy was carefully observed and respected, as in the difference between teacher and student, and officials and the people, and in accordance with individual capability and moral self-cultivation. He also suggested a precise bureaucratic system in order to avoid private abuse of power by both the king and officialdom. Although the high level of centralization of power in his proposed system is controversial, it seems that his argument is still relevant today since he emphasized that, through the "royal way" and wangjong, the state could be governed in accordance with the highest standards of fairness.

Abstract

This article analyzes Chong Yagyong's political philosophy, especially his discussion on his ideal for righteous governance (wangjong C). Chong proposed new discourses on human nature and active governance in order to realize his ideal of wangjong. He further suggested an integration of the central and local governing systems. In this integrated system, magistrates would have the duty to educate their people and solve economic problems. Chong Yagyong's theory on governance by pyondung (辨等,discriminating between different social status groups), underlining the strict hierarchy of social status and a hierarchical social order, emerged in the process of explicating this system. He believed that the state's governing system could be maintained only when status hierarchy was carefully observed and respected, as in the difference between teacher and student, and officials and the people, and in accordance with individual capability and moral self-cultivation. He also suggested a precise bureaucratic system in order to avoid private abuse of power by both the king and officialdom. Although the high level of centralization of power in his proposed system is controversial, it seems that his argument is still relevant today since he emphasized that, through the "royal way" and wangjong, the state could be governed in accordance with the highest standards of fairness.

참고문헌 (78)

  1. "雅言覺非", ~
  2. "中庸自箴", ~
  3. "大學", ~
  4. "大學章句", ~
  5. "弘齋全書", ~
  6. "經世遺表", ~
  7. "禮記", ~
  8. "論語", ~
  9. "孟子要義", ~
  10. "牧民心書", ~
  11. "論語古今註", ~
  12. "尙書古訓", ~
  13. "三峰集", ~
  14. "尙書", ~
  15. "宋子大全", ~
  16. "宋子大全續拾遺", ~
  17. "大學公議", ~
  18. "茶山詩文集", ~
  19. "退溪先生文集", ~
  20. "英祖實錄", ~
  21. "與猶堂全書", ~
  22. "栗谷先生全書", ~
  23. "朱熹集", ~
  24. "中庸章句", ~
  25. 장동우, "朝鮮時代 家禮 硏究를 위한 새로운 視覺과 方法", 한국사상사학, (39), pp.141~171 (2011), 한국사상사학회
  26. 장동우, "『주자가례』의 수용과 보급 과정 ― 동전東傳 판본版本 문제를 중심으로", 국학연구, (16), pp.183~206 (2010), 한국국학진흥원
  27. 장동우, "『家禮』 註釋書를 통해 본 朝鮮 禮學의 進展過程", 동양철학, 34(34), pp.239~269 (2010), 한국동양철학회
  28. 장동우, "고례(古禮) 중심의 예교(禮敎) 사상과 그 경학적 토대에 대한 고찰 -다산의 상의절요(喪儀節要)와 주자가례(朱子家禮)의 비교를 중심으로-", 한국실학연구, 13(13), pp.77~131 (2007), 한국실학학회
  29. 장동우, "다산 예학의 연구: 의례 상복과 상례사전 상기별의 비교를 중심으로", PhD, pp.1997
  30. 연구, "다산학", 2011, 55~84, pp.재단법인다산학술문화재단
  31. 趙誠乙, "丁若鏞의 政治經濟 改革思想 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.1992
  32. 조성산, "18세기 후반~19세기 전반 對淸認識의 변화와 새로운 中華 관념의 형성", 한국사연구, 145(145), pp.67~113 (2009), 한국사연구회
  33. 허태용, "조선후기 중화론과 역사인식" (2009), 아카넷
  34. 강석화, "조선후기 지방제도의 운영과 정약용의 개혁안", 한국학보, 65, pp.70~100 (1991)
  35. 강석화, "정약용의 관제개혁안 연구", 한국사론, 21, pp.175~236 (1989)
  36. 김호, "다산 정약용의 민주기획, 공공성의 위기와 실학", Proceedings of Academic Conference at the Institute for Korean Studies at Yonsei University (2013)
  37. 김상준, "남인 예론과 근대주권론", 다산학, 4, pp.163~194 (2003)
  38. 김태영, "經世遺表에 드러난 茶山 經世論의 역사적 성격", 퇴계학보, 129(129), pp.61~136 (2011), 퇴계학연구원
  39. 김태영, "다산 경세론에서의 왕권론", Tasanhak, 1, pp.162~262 (2000)
  40. 고영진, "16-17세기 예학의 지역적 분화과정과 그 특징", 국학연구, (13), pp.17~57 (2008), 한국국학진흥원
  41. 고영진, "조선중기예학사상사" (1995), Han’gilsa
  42. 김영민, "조선중화주의의 재검토 -이론적 접근-", 한국사연구, (162), pp.211~252 (2013), 한국사연구회
  43. 계승범, "조선후기 조선중화주의와 그 해석 문제", 한국사연구, 159(159), pp.265~294 (2012), 한국사연구회
  44. 계승범, "정지된 시간: 조선의 대보단과 근대의 문턱" (2011), 서강대학교출판부
  45. 배병삼, "Rethinking Korean politics", pp.320~326 (1996)
  46. 백민정, "조선 지식인의 王政論과 정치적 公共性: 箕子朝鮮 및 中華主義 문제와 관련하여", 동방학지, 164(164), pp.29~63 (2013), 국학연구원
  47. 박종천, "『國朝典禮考』에 나타난 茶山 丁若鏞의 禮論", 한국사상사학, 16, pp.117~158 (2001), 한국사상사학회
  48. 박현모, "정약용의 군주론: 정조와의 관계를 중심으로", 정치사상연구, 8, pp.7~30 (2003), 한국정치사상학회
  49. 변태섭, "고려정치제도사 연구" (1971), Ilchogak
  50. 이기백, "고려광종 연구" (1990), Ilchogak
  51. 이기백, "한국사신론" (1987), Ilchisa
  52. 이봉규, "A study of Tasan Cho˘ng Yagyong", pp.65~129 (2012), Saram u˘ i munu˘ i
  53. 이영훈, "다산 경세론의경학적 기초", 다산학, 1, pp.121~161 (2000)
  54. 우경섭, "朝鮮中華主義에 대한 학설사적 검토", 한국사연구, (159), pp.237~263 (2012), 한국사연구회
  55. Baker, Donald., "Rituals and Resistance in Choso˘n Korea", Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), pp.6~13 (2007)
  56. Donald Baker, "Shamans, Catholics, and Chŏng Yagyong : Tasan’s defense of the ritual hegemony of the Confucian state.", 다산학, (15), pp.139~180 (2009), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  57. DON BAKER, "PRACTICAL ETHICS AND PRACTICAL LEARNING: TASAN’S APPROACH TO MORAL CULTIVATION", Acta Koreana, 13(2), pp.47~61 (2010), 한국학연구원
  58. Brooks, E. Bruce, "The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors" (1998), Columbia University Press
  59. Deuchler, Martina., "The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea" (1985), Columbia University Press
  60. Deuchler, Martina., "The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology" (1995), Harvard University Asia Center
  61. Deuchler, Martina., "Is ‘Confucianization of Korea’ a Valid Concept of Analysis", Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), pp.3~5 (2007)
  62. Deuchler, Martina, "Tasan Chong Yag-yong: An Appreciation", Tasanhak, (16), pp.5~22 (2010)
  63. Duncan, John B., "The Social Background to the Founding of the Choso˘n Dynasty: Change or Continuity", Journal of Korean Studies, 6, pp.39~80 (1989)
  64. Duncan, John B., "The Origins of the Choso˘n Dynasty" (2000), University of Washington Press
  65. Gardner, Daniel K., "Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary, and the Classical Traditio" (2003), Columbia University Press
  66. Haboush, Jahyun Kim., "Culture and the State in late Choso˘n Korea", pp.46~90 (1999), Harvard University Press
  67. Haboush, Jahyun Kim., "The Confucian Kingship in Korea" (2001), Columbia University Press
  68. Ivanhoe, Philip J., "Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation" (2000), Hackett Publishing Co
  69. Anders Karlsson, "Geography and Civilization: Chŏng Yagyong and Late Chosŏn Notions of Chunghwa", 다산학, (16), pp.103~120 (2010), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  70. Kim Daeyeol, "The Social and Cultural Presence of Buddism in the Lives of Confucian Literati in Late Choson: The Case of Tasan", Seoul Journal of Korean Studies, 25(2), pp.213~242 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원
  71. Palais, James B., "Confucianism and the Aristocratic", Bureaucratic Balance in Korea, 1984, pp.44(2), 427~468
  72. Palais, James B., "Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyo˘ngwo˘n and Choso˘n Dynasty" (2007), Korean Translation edition
  73. Setton, Mark., "Cho˘ng Yagyong: Korea’s challenge to Orthodox neo-Confucianism" (1997), State University of New York Press
  74. Setton, Mark., "A Comparative Study of Cho˘ng Yagyong’s Classical Learning and Japanese Ancient Learning", Tasanhak, 3, pp.230~245 (2002)
  75. 존 알렌 터커, "Cheong Yagyong and the East Asian Confucian Return to Meaning", 다산학, (21), pp.245~283 (2012), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  76. Walraven, Boudewijn., "Culture and the State in late Choso˘n Korea", pp.160~198 (1999), Harvard University Press
  77. Boudewijn Walraven, "Beyond "Confucianization"", Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), pp.1~24 (2007), 동아시아학술원
  78. 봐우더베인 왈라번, "Tasan’s Writings as a Resource for the Historical Anthropology of Late Chosŏn Society", 다산학, 22(22), pp.229~257 (2013), 재단법인다산학술문화재단

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)