18세기 후반 石室書院과 지식·지식인의 재생산
The Seokshil Seowon and Reproduction of Knowledge and Intellectual in the late 18th century
2
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Seowon was not merely intended for civil service examination, but also intended for nurturing the idealistic intellectual supported by Sarim faction. A new intelligence movement led by Seowon in the late Joseon Dynasty period suddenly changed to trend that Seowon became an exclusive part of a clan, which happened to fail to function properly. That is the reason why Seowon's education gradually ran toward decay. The purpose of this research was to disclose what kind of knowledge was used and developed in and out of Seokshil Seowon in the late 18th century. In that course, I addressed a point to the matter of negative issues about civil service examination that was put importance on by Seokshil Seowon. Kim, Won-haeng was outstandingly serious about pointing out social ills of civil service examination system. Kim, Won-haeng emphasized practical learning instead of civil service examination, which meant confucian fidelity in the light of Neo-Confucianism. Accordingly, practical learning that Kim, Won-haeng emphasized didn't mean positive and developmental thing in itself. But, practical learning that he put importance on based upon negativism on civil service examination and scholastic effort on a daily life for himself could play a role of media expediting ‘dailiness and professionalism of knowledge’. On top of this, the tradition of the learning of images amd numbers and the statecraft that had been inherited centered on Andong the Kims reacted as an important academic background. That was the scholastic outcome of the background where Andong the Kims led Seokshil Seowon. For these combinative reasons, it could give birth to a new knowledge right outside of Seokshil Seowon. Around the Seokshil Seowon was Bukhak(the Thoughts for learning Qing Culture) pregnant. Seowon in the late of Joseon Dynasty period wasn't appealing as a space for new knowledge. As you saw in the case of Seokshil Seowon, so called the grounds for practical thought were made by Confucian scholars' social intercourse outside of Seokshil Seowon. This shows how new knowledge in the late Joseon Dynasty period started to form. Meetings of lectures or poetry clubs at the time were open communication places for discussing new knowledge without being confined to forms. It is a limit of educational institute of the time that Seowon wouldn't be able to embrace these intellectual movements into the education system.
Abstract
Seowon was not merely intended for civil service examination, but also intended for nurturing the idealistic intellectual supported by Sarim faction. A new intelligence movement led by Seowon in the late Joseon Dynasty period suddenly changed to trend that Seowon became an exclusive part of a clan, which happened to fail to function properly. That is the reason why Seowon's education gradually ran toward decay. The purpose of this research was to disclose what kind of knowledge was used and developed in and out of Seokshil Seowon in the late 18th century. In that course, I addressed a point to the matter of negative issues about civil service examination that was put importance on by Seokshil Seowon. Kim, Won-haeng was outstandingly serious about pointing out social ills of civil service examination system. Kim, Won-haeng emphasized practical learning instead of civil service examination, which meant confucian fidelity in the light of Neo-Confucianism. Accordingly, practical learning that Kim, Won-haeng emphasized didn't mean positive and developmental thing in itself. But, practical learning that he put importance on based upon negativism on civil service examination and scholastic effort on a daily life for himself could play a role of media expediting ‘dailiness and professionalism of knowledge’. On top of this, the tradition of the learning of images amd numbers and the statecraft that had been inherited centered on Andong the Kims reacted as an important academic background. That was the scholastic outcome of the background where Andong the Kims led Seokshil Seowon. For these combinative reasons, it could give birth to a new knowledge right outside of Seokshil Seowon. Around the Seokshil Seowon was Bukhak(the Thoughts for learning Qing Culture) pregnant. Seowon in the late of Joseon Dynasty period wasn't appealing as a space for new knowledge. As you saw in the case of Seokshil Seowon, so called the grounds for practical thought were made by Confucian scholars' social intercourse outside of Seokshil Seowon. This shows how new knowledge in the late Joseon Dynasty period started to form. Meetings of lectures or poetry clubs at the time were open communication places for discussing new knowledge without being confined to forms. It is a limit of educational institute of the time that Seowon wouldn't be able to embrace these intellectual movements into the education system.
참고문헌 (56)
- 金元行, "渼湖全書", pp.397~ (1986), 여강출판사
- 정만조, "朝鮮時代 書院硏究" (1997), 집문당
- 이수환, "朝鮮後期書院硏究" (2001), 일조각
- 이해준, "조선후기 문중서원 연구" (2008), 경인문화사
- 윤희면, "조선시대 서원과 양반" (2004), 집문당
- 오항녕, "石室書院의 渼湖 金元行과 그의 思想, In 북한강유역의 유학사상" (1998), 한림대
- 이경구, "金元行의 實心 강조와 石室書院에서의 교육 활동", 震檀學報, 88 (1999)
- 조준호, "朝鮮後期 石室書院의 位相과 學風", 朝鮮時代史學報, 11 (1999)
- 조준호, "경기지역 서원의 정치적 성격-石室書院을 중심으로 -", 국학연구, 1(11), pp.5~26 (2007), 한국국학진흥원
- 김영민, "역사 속의 성리학", pp.296~ (2010), 예문서원
- 윤희면, "조선시대 서원정책과 서원의 설립 실태", 역사학보, (181), pp.65~98 (2004), 역사학회
- "英祖實錄, 卷53", 英祖 17年 4月 20日(甲寅), ~
- 정만조, "17세기 중반 漢黨의 정치활동과 國政運營論", 韓國文化, 23 (1999)
- 조성산, "조선후기 낙론계 학풍의 형성과 전개", pp.112~113 (2007), 지식산업사
- 蔣建國, "知識生産与文化傳播一組織傳播視域下的中國古代書院一", 한국학논총, 30, pp.421~439 (2008), 한국학연구소
- 宋時烈, "宋子大全 卷171 「石室書院廟庭碑」", ~
- 金昌協, "農巖集 卷12 「答權致道 丁丑」", ~
- 李夏坤, "頭陀草 冊十三 雜著 「送金士寬南歸序」", ~
- 金昌協, "農巖集 別集 卷4 附錄 「諸家記述雜錄」", ~
- 최성환, "朝鮮後期 李縡의 學問과 寒泉精舍의 門人敎育", 歷史敎育, 77 (2001)
- 黃胤錫, "頤齋亂藁 2" (1995), 한국정신문화연구원
- 金元行, "渼湖集 卷12 「答趙憲喆」", ~
- 黃胤錫, "頤齋亂藁 4" (1998), 한국정신문화연구원
- 李縡, "陶菴集", ~
- 윤희면, "서원교육의 전개와 교육효과, In 조선시대 서원과 양반", pp.371~383 (2005), 집문당
- 박종배, "학규를 통해서 본 조선시대의 서원 강회", 교육사학연구, 19(2), pp.59~83 (2009), 교육사학회
- 李珥, "栗谷全書 卷15 「學校模範」", ~
- 金元行, "渼湖全書" (1986), 여강출판사
- 권오영, "18세기 湖洛論辨의 爭點과 그 性格, In 朝鮮時代의 社會와 性格" (1998), 朝鮮社會硏究會
- 荻野昌弘, "社會學的課題として科擧-文化資本から規律․訓練へ, In 知識人の諸相", pp.69~ (2000), 勉誠出版
- 鈴木智之, "象徵的暴力の再生産と科擧-ブルデュー社會學からの一視点, In 知識人の諸相" (2000), 勉誠出版
- 장동우, "中國古代 喪服의 制度와 理念", pp.24~30 (2007), 동과서
- 宮嶋博史, "朝鮮時代の科擧-全體像とその特徵-", 中國, 22, pp.76~77 (2007)
- 黃胤錫, "頤齋亂藁 1" (1994), 한국정신문화연구원
- 金元行, "渼湖集 卷17 「金君時鐸墓碣銘」", ~
- 任敬周, "靑川子稿 卷2 「贈八弟興甫序 甲寅」", ~
- 朴胤源, "近齋集 卷32 「渼湖金先生語錄」", ~
- 黃胤錫, "頤齋續稿, In 頤齋全書 上", pp.427~ (1976), 경인문화사
- 洪大容, "湛軒書 內集 卷3 「自警說」", ~
- 박종채, "역주과정록 권1", pp.37~38 (1997), 태학사
- 胤源, "近齋集 卷32 「渼湖金先生語錄」", ~
- 임종태, "무한우주의 우화 - 홍대용의 과학과 문명론", 역사비평, (71), pp.261~285 (2005), 역사문제연구소
- 조성산, "17세기 후반~18세기 초 김창협(金昌協)· 김창흡(金昌翕)의 학풍과 현실관", 역사와 현실, (51), pp.165~194 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 丁若鏞, "茶山詩文集 卷21 「示二兒」", ~
- Richard Rubinger, "私塾" (1979), サイマル出版會
- 海原徹, "近世私塾の硏究" (1983), 思文閣出版
- 陶德民, "懷德堂朱子學の硏究" (1994), 大阪大學出版會
- 脇田修, "懷德堂とその人びと" (1997), 大阪大學出版會
- 子安宣邦, "懷德堂知識人の學問と生" (2004), 和泉書院
- 湯淺邦弘, "懷德堂硏究" (2007), 汲古書院
- 大石學, "江戶の敎育力", pp.66~70 (2007), 東京學藝大學出版會
- 이광호, "上帝觀을 중심으로 본 儒學과 基督敎의 만남", 유교사상문화연구, (19), pp.533~566 (2003), 한국유교학회
- 김형찬, "천진암, 조선과 서학이 만난 공간", 오늘의 동양사상, 8 (2003)
- 김상홍, "茶山과 天眞菴의 관계", 동양학, (35), pp.4~4 (2004), 동양학연구원
- 김대식, "화서(華西) 문인공동체(門人共同體) 강회(講會)의 실제", 교육사학연구, 21(1), pp.39~64 (2011), 교육사학회
- 김경미, "조선후기 새로운 여성 문화 공간, 삼호정 시사(詩社)", 여성이론, 5, pp.225~227 (2001)
