이원조의 유물변증법의 수용 논리와 현실 대응-1931∼1934

Abstract

Yeocheon Yi Won-jo is evaluated as a person who developed criticism in the 1930s as an extension of tradition, but he is more than anyone else who insisted on creating works through material dialectic. His criticism in the early 1930s insisted on accurate observation of reality and polishing objective skills to develop logic. In the relationship between the creator and the critic, he also insisted that the critic should have authority and do literature with actions that can change reality. Yi Won-jo's criticism was a part of Joseon's emerging literature criticism at the time, and his ideas were able to be biased toward the dialectic of relics because he made it a basic learning attitude to reveal the logic of mutual relations and coexistence through physical objects in accordance with the yin-yang ideology of Neo-Confucianism. It can be seen that contradictions and conflicts have been combined with the materialism that is the driving force for historical development. Both literature and Neo-Confucianism of the dialectic of relics presupposed practical action. Therefore, Yi Won-jo was critical of his ideological writings because reality was always at the center, took issue with the deviation from reality, and criticized satire for not being a canon. Yi Won-jo emphasized action in literature and action, but when the situation became unfavorable in 1934, he put his action on hold and insisted on logical realism by suggesting a method of unifying subjectivity and objectivity as a way to protect literature. In addition, literature, which emphasized behavior among literature and actions, now recognized that literature had no choice but to emphasize literature more, and emphasized literature. This change in Yi Won-jo is not much different from the method of taxation of scholars who repeatedly leave office and retirement, and while considering moral culturetraining and salvation of the world as their basic duties, they put on hold.