본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is a Threat of Countervailing Duties Effective in Reducing Illegal Export Subsidies?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

The primary objective of this paper is to explore the efficacy of a threat of countervailing measures in reducing illegal export subsidies, by establishing a game-theoretical model to analyze the strategic relationship between exporting and importing countries. Analyzing the strategic incentive for the importing country to respond to export subsidies, this paper provides a rationale for the importing country to impose countervailing measures, thus demonstrating that the importing country increases its countervailing duty on the subsidized imports when the exporting country increases its export subsidies to its exporting firm. Additionally, it is determined that the exporting country’s optimal export subsidy rate is zero when the importing country has a right under the WTO to impose any countervailing duty against subsidized imports, thus implying that a threat of countervailing measures is indeed effective.

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to explore the efficacy of a threat of countervailing measures in reducing illegal export subsidies, by establishing a game-theoretical model to analyze the strategic relationship between exporting and importing countries. Analyzing the strategic incentive for the importing country to respond to export subsidies, this paper provides a rationale for the importing country to impose countervailing measures, thus demonstrating that the importing country increases its countervailing duty on the subsidized imports when the exporting country increases its export subsidies to its exporting firm. Additionally, it is determined that the exporting country’s optimal export subsidy rate is zero when the importing country has a right under the WTO to impose any countervailing duty against subsidized imports, thus implying that a threat of countervailing measures is indeed effective.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. Brander, J. A., "Strategic Trade Policy, In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3", pp.1395~1455 (1995), North-Holland
  2. Brander, J. A, "Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry", Journal of International Economics, 18(1–2), pp.83~100 (1985)
  3. Deardorff, A. V., "Economic Effects of ‘Leveling the Playing Field’ in International Trade", The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 19(1), pp.9~32 (2010)
  4. Dixit, A. K., "Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties under Oligopoly", European Economic Review, 32(1), pp.55~68 (1988)
  5. Eaton, J., "Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, pp.383~406 (1986)
  6. Kang, M., "Trade Policy Mix: IPR Protection and R&D Subsidies", Canadian Journal of Economics, 39(3), pp.744~757 (2006)
  7. Qiu, L. D., "Why Can’t Countervailing Duties Deter Export Subsidization?", Journal of International Economics, 39(3–4), pp.249~272 (1995)
  8. Spencer, B., "Capital Subsidies and Countervailing Duties in Oligopolistic Industries", Journal of International Economics, 25(1), pp.45~69 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)