Local Culture and Location Choice: Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes how the Korea-India CEPA and the third FTA influences the bilateral trade bewteen Korea and India using the trade date over 2001-2018. The results show that the Korea-India CEPA is playing a role in increasing the bilateral trade. However, as other FTAs have developed competitive relations with the Korea-India CEPA, the bilateral FTA has a negative impact on the bilateral trade. In particular, the sector that has a negative impact on industry-wise analysis shows that Korea is losing its competitiveness or is in worse conditions than other FTAs. Thus, These areas are need to be improved in the Korea-India CEPA amendment negotiations. In addition, some FTAs have been found to play a role in improving the Korea-India trade. This implies that the bilateral trade will expand as the GVC system is well established with the countries of other FTA signed by the two countries. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a mutually win-win system between the Korea-India CEPA and other FTAs by delicately establishing GVC system with other countries. In conclusion, the FTA signed between the two countries may have negative trade diversion effects, but if it is used well with a delicate GVC system, it could lead to positive trade diversion effects.
Abstract
This study analyzes how the Korea-India CEPA and the third FTA influences the bilateral trade bewteen Korea and India using the trade date over 2001-2018. The results show that the Korea-India CEPA is playing a role in increasing the bilateral trade. However, as other FTAs have developed competitive relations with the Korea-India CEPA, the bilateral FTA has a negative impact on the bilateral trade. In particular, the sector that has a negative impact on industry-wise analysis shows that Korea is losing its competitiveness or is in worse conditions than other FTAs. Thus, These areas are need to be improved in the Korea-India CEPA amendment negotiations. In addition, some FTAs have been found to play a role in improving the Korea-India trade. This implies that the bilateral trade will expand as the GVC system is well established with the countries of other FTA signed by the two countries. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a mutually win-win system between the Korea-India CEPA and other FTAs by delicately establishing GVC system with other countries. In conclusion, the FTA signed between the two countries may have negative trade diversion effects, but if it is used well with a delicate GVC system, it could lead to positive trade diversion effects.
참고문헌 (30)
- Anwar, S., "Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Vietnam", Asia Pacific business review, 16(1-2), pp.183~202 (2010)
- Asiedu, E., "On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries : is Africa different?", World development, 30(1), pp.107~119 (2002)
- Büthe, T., "The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries : increasing FDI through international trade agreements?", American journal of political science, 52(4), pp.741~762 (2008)
- Chakrabarti, A., "The determinants of foreign direct investment : sensitivity analysis of cross-country regression", Kyklos, 54(1), pp.89~114 (2001)
- Chen, C. H., "Regional determinants of foreign direct investment in mainland China", Journal of economic studies, 23(2), pp.18~30 (1996)
- Cheng, L. K., "What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience", Journal of international economics, 51(2), pp.379~400 (2000)
- Chidlow, A., "Regional determinants of inward FDI distribution in Poland", International business review, 18(2), pp.119~133 (2009)
- Chung, D. X., "The determinants of location choice of Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam", MA, pp.2018
- Duanmu, J. L., "Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Chinese multinational enterprises(MNEs)", Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp.64~72 (2012)
- Disdier, A. C., "How different is Eastern Europe? Structure and determinants of location choices by French firms in Eastern and Western Europe", Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2), pp.280~296 (2004)
- Du, J., "Economic institutions and FDI location choice : Evidence from US multinationals in China", Journal of comparative Economics, 36(3), pp.412~429 (2008)
- Globerman, S., "Global foreign direct investment flows : The role of governance infrastructure", World development, 30(11), pp.1899~1919 (2002)
- Globerman, S., "Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment", Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp.19~39 (2003)
- Head, K., "Agglomeration benefits and location choice : Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States", Journal of international economics, 38(3-4), pp.223~247 (1995)
- Hennart, J. F., "Location, governance, and strategic determinants of Japanese manufacturing investment in the United States", Strategic management journal, 15(6), pp.419~436 (1994)
- Kang, S. J., "The determinants of location choice of South Korean FDI in China", Japan and the world economy, 19(4), pp.441~460 (2007)
- Kang, Y., "FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia : Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective", Journal of world business, 47(1), pp.45~53 (2012)
- Kirkpatrick, C., "The effect of environmental regulation on the locational choice of Japanese foreign direct investment", Applied Economics, 40(11), pp.1399~1409 (2008)
- Lim, M. E. G., "Determinants of, and the relation between, foreign direct investment and growth: a summary of the recent literature", International Monetary Fund, WP, 175, pp.2001, 1~28
- Makino, S., "Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking : Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies", Journal of international business studies, 33(3), pp.403~421 (2002)
- McFadden, D., "The measurement of urban travel demand", Journal of public economics, 3(4), pp.303~328 (1974)
- Determinants of foreign direct investment and its impact on economic growth in developing countries, "Mottaleb, K. A.", University library of Munich, ~, pp.MPRA paper 9457 (2007)
- Nguyen, T. D., "Multiple Sublineages of Influenza A Virus(H5N1)", Emerging infectious diseases, Vietnam, 14(4), pp.632~ (2008)
- Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh, "Regional Determinants of FDI Location in Vietnam", Journal of Economics and Development, 18(1), pp.19~ (2016)
- Oldenski, L., "Export versus FDI and the communication of complex information", Journal of International Economics, 87(2), pp.312~322 (2012)
- Quer, D., "Political risk, cultural distance, and outward foreign direct investment : Empirical evidence from large Chinese firms", Asia Pacific journal of management, 29(4), pp.1089~1104 (2012)
- Ramasamy, B., "China's outward foreign direct investment : Location choice and firm ownership", Journal of world business, 47(1), pp.17~25 (2012)
- Tsai, P. L., "Determinants of foreign direct investment and its impact on economic growth", Journal of economic development, 19(1), pp.137~163 (1994)
- Wheeler D, "International Investment Location Decisions:The Case for U.S Firms", Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2), pp.57~76 (1992)
- "Ministry of planning and Investment" (2016)[URL]