본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국과 주요국의 조세 및 사회보장 부담에 관한 비교 분석

A Comparative Study of Tax Burdens and Social Security Contribution among Eight OECD Countries

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본고는 8개국(한국, 일본, 프랑스, 영국, 스웨덴, 독일, 미국, 캐나다)을 대상으로 이들 국가의 조세 및 사회보장 부담을 비교․분석하고, 그로부터 한국의 조세 및 사회보장 부담이 어떻게 이루어지고 있는지의 특징을 부각시키는 데 그 목적이 있다. 분석 방법으로는 주요국의 일인당 소득(GDP)수준 및 국민 부담액의 비교, 정부계층별 조세부담률, 사회보장 부담률의 비교, 나아가 평균한계세율과 소득탄력성 추정 등의 방법을 이용하고 있다. 본고의 주된 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 한국의 조세 및 사회보장 부담액과 부담률은 다른 주요 국가에 비해 낮은 상황이지만 가장 빠른 속도로 상승하여 왔다. 2) 소득에 대한 조세의 평균한계세율도 주요국에 비해 낮은 편이다. 3) 그러나 조세 및 사회보장 부담의 소득 탄력성이 높게 나타나 상대적으로 그 부담감을 높게 느끼기 쉬운 구조이다. 4) 특히 사회보장 부담에 대한 부담감(탄력성)은 주요국에 비해 아주 높게 나타나고 있어 심한 불안 요소로 작용하고 있다.

Abstract

This paper investigates country comparison on the tax burdens and the social security contribution among eight OECD countries, including United State of America, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Sweden, Japan, and South Korea. The basic measures for comparison are the indices of per capita gross domestic product, total tax burden, federal or central tax burden, local tax burden, and social security contribution. I also estimate average marginal tax rates, average marginal tax rates that exclude time trend, income elasticities of tax burden and social security contribution. The main results are as follows. Firstly, while OECD average growth rates of per capita GDP show 4.5% from 1980 to 2015 and the average growth rates of 7 countries excluding South Korea are between 3.9% (Japan) and 5.2% (the United Kingdom), South Korea’s average growth rate records high at 8.0%. It is because South Korea has been a developing country with high growth rates before the Asian economic crisis in 1997. Among eight counties, Japan has experienced drastic changes in terms of US dollar-based value. Per capita GDP of Japan illustrates 1.91 times higher than OECD average in 1995 mainly due to Yen appreciation. It lessened to 0.95 times compared to OECD average in 2015 because Japan has confronted to the lost two decades after the burst of bubble economy in early 1990s. Per head tax burden reveals a similar pattern to per head GDP since GDP directly affect to tax burden. That is, South Korea’s average growth rates of per head tax burden have risen with a high speed, and Japan per head total tax burden has been most volatile since 1980. However, Sweden records 2.17 times higher than OECD average in per head total tax revenue that includes social security contribution in 1980 and 1.69 times in 2015. Secondly, even though tax burdens of countries with unitary government differ from those with federal government, tax burden ratios to GDP vary from country to country. In the federal countries including Germany, USA and Canada, tax burden ratios to GDP at the state level are higher than at the local level, in which the state-tax burden ratio to GDP records highest at 12.4% in Germany in 2015. Among eight countries, the local-tax burden ratio to GDP shows highest at 16.9% in Sweden and lowest at 1.6% in the United Kingdom. While the total tax ratio to GDP records highest at 47.6% in Sweden, it does lowest at 25.3% in South Korea and next at 26.3% in USA. In the burden ratio of social security contribution to GDP, France shows highest at 16.9% and the United Kingdom does lowest at 6.1%. Thirdly, according to the estimation of total tax revenues with the periods from 1991 to 2015, the average marginal tax rates to income (per capita GDP) appear highest at 0.460 in France, lowest at 0.240 in USA, and next lowest at 0.266 in South Korea. However, the average marginal tax rates that exclude time trend appear highest at 0.691 in USA, lowest at 0.183 in Canada, and next lowest at 0.254 in South Korea. South Korea shows highest income elasticities of total tax burden at 1.189 and Canada does lowest at 0.183. In the estimation of central or federal tax revenues with the same periods, the average marginal tax rates record highest at 0.261 in the United Kingdom, lowest at 0.096 in USA. The average marginal tax rates to GDP at central or federal level that exclude time trend appear highest at 0.500 in USA, lowest at 0.115 in Canada. From the estimation result we know that marginal tax rate that excludes time trend appears high in USA. Meanwhile, South Korea shows highest income elasticity of tax burden at central level with the value of 1.068 and France does lowest with 0.629. Finally, according to the estimation of local tax revenues with the same periods, the average marginal tax rates appear highest at 0.164 in Sweden, lowest at 0.020 in the United Kingdom. The average marginal tax rates at local level that exclude time trend appear highest at 0.054 in South Korea, lowest at 0.008 in the United Kingdom. However, the United Kingdom shows highest income elasticities of local tax burden at 1.462 and Canada does lowest at 0.883. The results indicate that though the average marginal tax rate of local tax is lowest in the United Kingdom, UK has high elasticity of local tax burden. In the estimation of social security contribution, the average marginal tax (contribution) rates appear highest at 0.145 in France, lowest at 0.045 in Canada. On the other hand, the average marginal tax (contribution) rate that excludes time trend appears highest at 0.073 in Japan due to the rapid aging society. Furthermore, South Korea shows highest income elasticity of social security contribution at 1.696 and France does lowest at 0.835. This result indicates that South Korea has highest income elasticity of social security contribution. Considering the estimation of tax burdens mentioned above, Korean people may feel heavy marginal burdens of tax and social security contribution.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 재정지출의 생산성 제고를 위한 연구, "고영선", 한국개발연구원, ~, pp.KDI 연구보고서 2004-07 (2005)
  2. 한국과 일본의 지방 복지지출 구조 비교, "국중호", 한국조세재정연구원, ~ (2016)
  3. 복지지출과 조세부담의 적정조합에 관한 연구, "김성욱", 국회입법조사처, ~ (2014)
  4. 국가 간 재정규모 비교분석, "김성태", 국가경쟁력연구원, ~ (2006)
  5. 조세 및 사회보장 부담이 거시 경제에 미치는 영향 분석, "남상호", 한국보건사회연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 2008-23-3 (2008)
  6. 사회보장재정의 국제비교와 전망, "노인철", 한국보건사회연구원, ~, pp.정책연구자료 1995-08 (1995)
  7. 박형수, "조세부담률의 국제비교 및 적정수준 분석", 재정포럼, pp.30~57 (2004), 한국조세연구원
  8. 박형수, "분야별 재정지출의 국제비교", 재정포럼, pp.26~53 (2005), 한국조세연구원
  9. 사회정책목표의 실질적 달성을 위한 중장기 복지재정운영방향, "유근춘", 한국보건사회연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 2012-19 (2012)
  10. 중앙․지방재정 관계의발전방향, "유태현", 한국지방재정학회, ~ (2017)
  11. 나성린, "한국의 적정 조세부담률", 공공경제, 8(1), pp.95~116 (2003), 한국재정학회
  12. 분야별 재원배분에 대한 국제비교 연구, "전승훈", 국회예산정책처, ~, pp.경제현안분석 제7호 (2006)
  13. 황의서, "국제비교를 통한 조세부담 평가", 경상논총, 4, pp.85~98 (1986)
  14. Arnold, J. M., "Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth", Economic Journal, 121(550), pp.F59~F80 (2011)
  15. Average Marginal Tax Rates from Social Security and the Individual Income Tax, "Barro, R.J.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, 1214 (1983)
  16. Feldstein, M., "Social Security Rules and Marginal Tax Rates", National Tax Journal, 45(1), pp.1~22 (1992)
  17. Musgrave, R.A, "Public Finance in Theory and Practice" (1989), McGraw-Hill
  18. OECD, "Economic Outlook", ~
  19. OECD, "Revenue Statistics", ~
  20. 財政制度分科会海外調査報告書, "財政制度等審議会", ~ (2007)
  21. 柴田啓司, "主要國の地方財政制度(イギリス․ドイツ․フランス․アメリカ)", 財務總合政策研究所, ~ (2001)
  22. 總務省, "國の予算と地方財政計画との関係", ~ (2016)
  23. 總務省, "地方財政白書" (2017)
  24. 地方財政システムの國際比較, "渡部智之", 財務總合政策研究所, ~ (2002)
  25. 平川伸一, "地方財政制度の國際比較", フィナンシャル․レビュ一, 8(4)통권 : 105, pp.89~112 (2011), 財務總合政策研究所
  26. 平川伸一, "財政調整制度と地方自治体の財政規律に関する国際比較(DP)", 財務総合政策研究所, ~ (2009)
  27. 主要諸外国における国と地方の財政役割の状況 報告書(全3分冊), "林正義", 財務総合政策研究所, ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)