뇌 기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등학교 학생의 과학 자유탐구에서 인지적 영역 분석
Analyses on Elementary Students' Cognitive Domain in Free Science Inquiry Activities Applying a Brain-Based Evolutionary Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In National Curriculum of Science revised in 2007, the Free Inquiry was newly introduced to increase students' interest in science and to foster creativity by having students make their own question and find answer by themselves. The purpose of the study was to analyze characteristics, in cognitive domain, appeared in the processes of performing the Free Inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary science teaching and learning principles. For this study, 106 fifth grade students participated, and they performed individually Free Inquiry activities. In order to characterize of the diversifying, estimating-evaluating-executing, and extending-applying activities in cognitive domain (C-DEF), the Free Inquiry diary constructed by the students, observations by a researcher, and interviews with the students were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The major results of this study were as follows: First, at C-D step, many students (71.5%) had difficulty in searching the meanings of their results and the contents of interpretations were at the level of simple description of their results. A few students (15.2%) derived interpretations based on causal relationships between specific variable and result. Also, the tendency that the numbers of interpretation about meaning of their results were increased as the scores of science attitude and achievement was appeared. Second, at C-E step, the students showed tendency of considering facts exactly explaining inquiry topic and being appliable to daily life rather than objectivity or accuracy of scientific knowledge. Third, at C-F step, there were three types of extension and application: simple repetition (8.2%), extension (64.0%), and upward application (17.6%) types. Based on these findings, implications for supporting appropriate interpretation, evaluation, and application of inquiry results are discussed.
Abstract
In National Curriculum of Science revised in 2007, the Free Inquiry was newly introduced to increase students' interest in science and to foster creativity by having students make their own question and find answer by themselves. The purpose of the study was to analyze characteristics, in cognitive domain, appeared in the processes of performing the Free Inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary science teaching and learning principles. For this study, 106 fifth grade students participated, and they performed individually Free Inquiry activities. In order to characterize of the diversifying, estimating-evaluating-executing, and extending-applying activities in cognitive domain (C-DEF), the Free Inquiry diary constructed by the students, observations by a researcher, and interviews with the students were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The major results of this study were as follows: First, at C-D step, many students (71.5%) had difficulty in searching the meanings of their results and the contents of interpretations were at the level of simple description of their results. A few students (15.2%) derived interpretations based on causal relationships between specific variable and result. Also, the tendency that the numbers of interpretation about meaning of their results were increased as the scores of science attitude and achievement was appeared. Second, at C-E step, the students showed tendency of considering facts exactly explaining inquiry topic and being appliable to daily life rather than objectivity or accuracy of scientific knowledge. Third, at C-F step, there were three types of extension and application: simple repetition (8.2%), extension (64.0%), and upward application (17.6%) types. Based on these findings, implications for supporting appropriate interpretation, evaluation, and application of inquiry results are discussed.
참고문헌 (35)
- Campbell, D. T., "Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes", Psychological Review, 67(6), pp.380~400 (1960)
- Chinn, C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools : A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86(2), pp.175~218 (2002)
- Germann, P. J., "Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals : Promoting science inquiry", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), pp.475~499 (1996)
- Hidi, S., "Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development", pp.89~115 (2004), Erlbaum
- Hodson, D., "Practical work in school science: Which way now?", pp.93~108 (1998), Routledge
- Hull, D. L., "Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
- Kim, C. J., "Introduction to science education" (1999), BooksHill
- Kim, D. Y., "Development and application of the taxonomic framework of types of biological knowledge and learning in elementary school science", 석사, pp.2010
- 김재영, "뇌 기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등학교 학생의 과학 자유탐구에서 행동 영역 분석", 초등과학교육, 33(3), pp.579~587 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Characteristics of achievement trend in Korea's middle and high school students from international achievement assessment (TIMSS, "PISA)", Kim, K., 2008, Research Report RRE 2008-3-1
- Krapp, A., "The handbook of selfdetermination research", pp.405~427 (2002), University of Rochester Press
- Krapp, A., "Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development. Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective", Learning and Instruction, 12, pp.3830409~ (2002)
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.990~1010 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발", 생물교육, 40(4), pp.429~452 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌 기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형을 적용한 초등학교 학생의 자유 탐구 활동에서 과학 태도와 흥미 주제 영역 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(4), pp.541~554 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Martin-Hansen, L., "Defining inquiry", The Science Teacher, 69, pp.34~37 (2002)
- Science curriculum, "Ministry of Education and Science Technology", Ministry of Education and Science Technology, ~, pp.Announcement 2007-79 (2007)
- Niaz, M., "Reasoning strategies of students in solving chemistry problems as a function of developmental level, functional M-capacity, and disembedding ability", Journal of Chemical Education, 64, pp.502~505 (1996)
- Peters, E., "Reforming cookbook labs", Science Scope, 29(3), pp.16~21 (2005)
- Plotkin, H., "Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge" (1994), Harvard University Press
- Popper, K. R., "The logic of scientific discovery" (1968), Harper and Row
- Popper, K. R., "Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach" (1972), Oxford University Press
- Renninger, K. A., "Social interaction and the development of children’s understanding", pp.147~172 (1989), Ablex
- Renninger, K. A., "Knowing and remembering in young children", pp.127~165 (1990), Cambridge Press
- Renninger, K. A., "Intrinsic motivation:Controversies and new directions", pp.373~404 (2000), Academic Press
- Renninger, K. A., "Building virtual communities:Learning and change in cyberspace", pp.60~95 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Renninger, K. A., "Individual interest as context in expository text and mathematical word problems", Learning and Instructions, 12, pp.467~491 (2002)
- 신현화, "초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(3), pp.262~276 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Simonton, D. K., "Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark", Review of General Psychology (2011)[DOI]
- Tinajero, C, "Field dependenceindependence and academic achievement : A re-examination of their relationship", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, pp.199~212 (1997)
- Witkin, H. A., "Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence" (1981), International Universities Press
- Witkin, H. A., "Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications", Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp.1~64 (1977)
- Witkin, H. A., "A manual for the embedded figures test" (1971), Consulting Psychologists Press
- Yoon, H. G., "The change of middle school students' motivation for investigation through the extended science investigations", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), pp.137~154 (2000)
- Ziman, J., "Real science : What it is, and what it means" (2000), Cambridge University Press