인지적 영역 중심의 뇌기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등 과학 수업에서 학생들의 과학 창의성 분석
Analyses of Elementary School Students' Scientific Creativity in Cognitive Domain by Applying a Brain-Based Evolutionary Approach to Science Instruction
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A brain-based evolutionary approach developed by reflecting the brain functions and authentic science is consisted of Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive domains, and within each domain the processes of Diversifying, Evaluating, and Furthering are proceeded (ABC-DEF). Two core components of creativity of originality and usefulness are inherent in each step. So, this study analyzed scientific creativity with the originality and usefulness components in cognitive domain, which is composed of diversifying the meanings inherent in the results of observations or experiments (C-D), evaluating the meanings (C-E), and furthering (C-F) in learning of ‘World of Plants’ unit which includes two topics of ‘Plants on Land’ and ‘Plants in Water and Special Environment’. A total of 20 fourth grade students at Y elementary school in Gyeonggi province participated in the study. The main results of this study are as follows. First, the scientific creativity in step C-D (Diversifying stage) was assessed according to the scientific creativity assessment formula. The scores of scientific creativity were quite different with topics and showed different pattern in the originality and usefulness components. Second, when the students compare and evaluate the values of each meaning (C-E stage), they weighed more on usefulness than originality, such as “because it is useful” or “because it solve many everyday problems”. Third, the overall scores of scientific creativity in step C-F (Furthering stage), as compared with those of step C-D, were low and showed decrease in the average scores of originality from 9.8 to 7.5 points, whereas increase in the average scores of usefulness from 5.4 to 6.1 points. In conclusion, these results showed that, even though the levels were not so high, the students, as scientists, can exhibit the scientific creativity in the processes of diversifying, comparing and evaluating, and applying the meanings about the results obtained by observations or experiments. The specific and various strategies to help students express their potential scientific creativity more effectively need to be developed.
Abstract
A brain-based evolutionary approach developed by reflecting the brain functions and authentic science is consisted of Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive domains, and within each domain the processes of Diversifying, Evaluating, and Furthering are proceeded (ABC-DEF). Two core components of creativity of originality and usefulness are inherent in each step. So, this study analyzed scientific creativity with the originality and usefulness components in cognitive domain, which is composed of diversifying the meanings inherent in the results of observations or experiments (C-D), evaluating the meanings (C-E), and furthering (C-F) in learning of ‘World of Plants’ unit which includes two topics of ‘Plants on Land’ and ‘Plants in Water and Special Environment’. A total of 20 fourth grade students at Y elementary school in Gyeonggi province participated in the study. The main results of this study are as follows. First, the scientific creativity in step C-D (Diversifying stage) was assessed according to the scientific creativity assessment formula. The scores of scientific creativity were quite different with topics and showed different pattern in the originality and usefulness components. Second, when the students compare and evaluate the values of each meaning (C-E stage), they weighed more on usefulness than originality, such as “because it is useful” or “because it solve many everyday problems”. Third, the overall scores of scientific creativity in step C-F (Furthering stage), as compared with those of step C-D, were low and showed decrease in the average scores of originality from 9.8 to 7.5 points, whereas increase in the average scores of usefulness from 5.4 to 6.1 points. In conclusion, these results showed that, even though the levels were not so high, the students, as scientists, can exhibit the scientific creativity in the processes of diversifying, comparing and evaluating, and applying the meanings about the results obtained by observations or experiments. The specific and various strategies to help students express their potential scientific creativity more effectively need to be developed.
참고문헌 (33)
- , 2011
- 김지은, "정의적 영역 중심의 뇌기반 진화적 접근에 따른 ‘생물과 환경’ 단원에 대한 초등 학생들의 활동 분석", 생물교육, 43(4), pp.464~472 (2015), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 옥찬미, "인지적 영역 중심의 뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 초등학생들의 ‘식물의 세계’ 학습 활동 분석", 생물교육, 44(3), pp.569~578 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.990~1010 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발", 생물교육, 40(4), pp.429~452 (2012), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 임채성, "과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용", 초등과학교육, 33(2), pp.242~257 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 임채성, "초등과학창의성의 정의․실제․평가", 한국초등과학교육학회 제69차 하계학술대회: 창의적인초등 교사를 위한 과학교육(기조강연 A) (2015)
- 최인수, "창의성의 발견" (2011), 쌤앤파커스
- 최효선, "행동적 영역 중심의 뇌기반 진화적 접근에 따른 ‘식물의 뿌리 기능 알아보기’에 대한 초등학생들의 활동 분석", 생물교육, 44(1), pp.167~178 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Alexander, P. A, "Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns", Educational Psychology, 27, pp.33~51 (1992)
- Amabile, T. M, "Frontiers of creativity research: beyond the basics", pp.223~254 (1987), Bearly
- Baer, J, "Creativity and divergent thinking: A taskspecific approach" (1993), Erlbaum
- Baer, J, "The case for domain specificity in creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 11, pp.173~177 (1998)
- Batey, M, "The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework", Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), pp.55~65 (2012)
- Boden, M. A, "Dimensions of creativity", pp.75~117 (1996), Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Clark, R. L, "Modifying cookbook labs to mentally engage students", The Science Teacher, 67(7), pp.40~43 (2000)
- DasGupta, S, "Creativity in invention and design - Computational and cognitive explorations of technological originality" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Findlay, C. S, "The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation", Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11, pp.3~55 (1988)
- Gardner, H, "Creating minds" (1993), Basic Books
- Glück, J, "How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), pp.55~67 (2002)
- Kaufman, J. C, "Creativity and reason in cognitive development" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Kaufman, J. C, "Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity", Review of General Psychology, 13(1), pp.1~12 (2009)
- Kaufman, J. C, "Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), pp.229~236 (2013)
- Kaufman, J. C, "Sure, I’m creative - But not in mathematics! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains", Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, pp.143~155 (2004)
- Mayr, E, "This is biology: The science of the living world" (1997), Universities Press
- Mumford, M. D, "Process analytic of creative capacities", Creativity Research Journal, 4, pp.91~122 (1991)
- Newton, D. P, "Assessing the creativity of scientific explanations in elementary science: An insider-outsider view of intuitive assessment in the hypothesis space", Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), pp.187~201 (2010)
- Peters, E, "Reforming cookbook labs", Science Scope, 29(3), pp.16~21 (2005)
- Plucker, J. A, "Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research", Educational Psychologist, 39, pp.83~96 (2004)
- Richards, R, "Everyday creativity, eminent creativity and pschopathology", Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), pp.212~217 (1993)
- Sternberg, R. J, "Handbook of human creativity" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Sternberg, R. J, "Creativity: From potential to realization" (2004), APA
- Weisberg, R. W, "Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius" (1992), Freeman