본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

뇌 기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형을 적용한 초등학교 학생의 자유 탐구 활동에서 과학 태도와 흥미 주제 영역 분석

Analyses on Elementary Students' Science Attitude and Topics of Interest in Free Inquiry Activities according to a Brain-based Evolutionary Science Teaching and Learning Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

Interest is acknowledged to be a critical motivational variable that influences learning and achievement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interest of the elementary students when free inquiry activities were performed through a brain-based evolutionary scientific teaching and learning model. For this study, 106 fifth grade students were chosen and performed individually free inquiry activities. The results of this study were as follows: First, after free inquiry activities, as to free inquiry science related attitude, a statistically significant difference was not observed. But they came to have positive feelings about the free inquiry. Especially students marked higher mean score in openness showed consistency in sub-areas of free inquiry science related attitude. Second, students had interests in various fields, especially they had many interests in area of biology. They chose inquiry subjects that seems to be easily accessible from surrounding and as an important criterion of free inquiry they thought the possibility that they could successfully perform it. And students who belong to the high level in the science related attitudes and academic achievement diversified more topics. Third, most of students failed to further their topics. However, the students who specifically and clearly extended their topics suggested appropriate variables in their topics. On the other hand, students who couldn't elaborate their topics were also failed to suggest further topics and their performance of inquiry was more incomplete. In conclusion, the experiences of success in free inquiry make the science attitude of students more positive and help them extend their inquiry. These results have fundamental implications for the authentic science inquiry in the elementary schools and for the further research.

Abstract

Interest is acknowledged to be a critical motivational variable that influences learning and achievement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interest of the elementary students when free inquiry activities were performed through a brain-based evolutionary scientific teaching and learning model. For this study, 106 fifth grade students were chosen and performed individually free inquiry activities. The results of this study were as follows: First, after free inquiry activities, as to free inquiry science related attitude, a statistically significant difference was not observed. But they came to have positive feelings about the free inquiry. Especially students marked higher mean score in openness showed consistency in sub-areas of free inquiry science related attitude. Second, students had interests in various fields, especially they had many interests in area of biology. They chose inquiry subjects that seems to be easily accessible from surrounding and as an important criterion of free inquiry they thought the possibility that they could successfully perform it. And students who belong to the high level in the science related attitudes and academic achievement diversified more topics. Third, most of students failed to further their topics. However, the students who specifically and clearly extended their topics suggested appropriate variables in their topics. On the other hand, students who couldn't elaborate their topics were also failed to suggest further topics and their performance of inquiry was more incomplete. In conclusion, the experiences of success in free inquiry make the science attitude of students more positive and help them extend their inquiry. These results have fundamental implications for the authentic science inquiry in the elementary schools and for the further research.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 곽영순, "초·중등 학생들의 과학 흥미도 조사", 한국지구과학회지, 27(3), pp.260~268 (2006), 한국지구과학회
  2. 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅳ)-수학, 과학, 실과" (2008), 금성출판사
  3. 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 5학년 과학 교사용 지도서" (2011), 금성출판사
  4. 김경식, "과학교과 흥미도의 종단적 변화와 그 영향요인", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.100~110 (2009), 과학교육연구소
  5. 국제 학업 성취도 평가(TIMSS, "PISA)에 나타난 우리나라 중․고등학생의 서취 변화의 특성", 김경희, 2008, pp.222~, 연구보고 RRE 2008-3-1
  6. 金味拏, "초등학교 학생의 자연과에 대한 학습 흥미도 조사 : 생물 영역", 석사, pp.1999
  7. 김재우, "토론 및 자기 반성 과정을 통한 중학교 1학년 학생들의 탐구 문제 수정 과정에 대한 사례 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), pp.267~275 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  8. 김재우, "중학교 1학년 학생들의 자유 탐구 보고서에 나타난 변인의 유형", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), pp.297~301 (1998)
  9. 김찬종, "과학교육학개론" (1999), 북스힐
  10. 김효남, "국가수준의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성에 평가체제 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(3), pp.357~369 (1998)
  11. 박종호, "자유 탐구 활동이 초등학생의 과학탐구능력과 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향", 초등과학교육학회지, 20(2), pp.271~280 (2001)
  12. 신현화, "초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(3), pp.262~276 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
  13. 심규철, "초등 교과서에서 제시된 과학 탐구 활동의 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.24~31 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
  14. 이형철, "자유탐구 수업이 초등학생의 과학적 태도 및 과학탐구능력에 미치는 영향과 지도교사들의 자유탐구에 대한 인식 조사", 과학교육연구지, 34(2), pp.405~420 (2010), 과학교육연구소
  15. 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 과학 교수학습 모형의 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(8), pp.990~1010 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  16. 임채성, "초등학교 학생이 지각한 감성 상태와 과학 학습 경험에 대한 기억의 관계", 생물교육, 32(2), pp.173~180 (2004), 한국생물교육학회
  17. 장신호, "과학적 증거 근거의 제시를 강조하는 과학 대화를 사용한 수업에 대한 예비 초등 교사들의 인식", 초등과학교육, 25(1), pp.96~108 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
  18. 조희형, "과학 학습지도-계획과 방법-" (1995), 교육과학사
  19. 진성욱, "생활 주변 자료의 활용이 과학 지식, 탐구 능력 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 17(2), pp.113~121 (1998)
  20. Ashby, F. G., "The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention, In Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour", pp.245~287 (2002), John Benjamins
  21. Campbell, D. T., "Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes", Psychological Review, 67(6), pp.380~400 (1960)
  22. Campbell, D. T., "From evolutionary epistemology via selection theory to a sociology of scientific validitiy", Evolution and Cognition, 3, pp.5~38 (1997)
  23. Cziko, G., "Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution" (1995), A Bradford Book, The MIT Press
  24. Cziko, G., "The things we do: Using the lessons of Bernard and Darwin to understand the what, how, and why of our behavior" (2000), MIT Press. London
  25. Damasio, A., "Descartes’ error" (1994), Putnam
  26. Damasio, A., "Looking for spinoza, joy, sorrow and the feeling brain" (2003), Harcourt, Inc
  27. Edelman, G. M., "Brilliant air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind" (1992), Penguin
  28. Edelman, G. M., "Neural Darwinism: Selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function", Neuron, 10, pp.115~125 (1993)
  29. Fraser, B. J., "TOSRA: Test of science-related attitudes handbook", Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research Limited, ~ (1981)
  30. Germann, P. J., "Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting science inquiry", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), pp.475~499 (1996)
  31. Hidi, S., "Interest: A unique motivational variable", Educational Research Review, 1(2), pp.69~82 (2006)
  32. Hodson, D., "과학실험실습교육", pp.111~129 (2001), 시그마프레스
  33. Martin, R., "Teaching science for all children: An inquiry approach 5th Ed" (2008), Pearson Education Inc
  34. Panksepp, J., "Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions" (1998), Oxford University Press
  35. Panksepp, J., "At the interface of the affective, behavioural and cognitive neurosciences: Decoding the emotional feelings of the brain", Brain and Cognition, 52, pp.4~14 (2003)
  36. Plotkin, H., "Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge" (1994), Harvard University Press
  37. Randler, C., "Pupils’ interest before, during and after a curriculum dealing with ecological topics and its relationship with achievement", Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, pp.463~478 (2007)
  38. Randler, C., "Cognitive achievements in identification skills", Journal of Biological Education, 40, pp.161~165 (2006)
  39. Schaverien, L., "A biological basis for generative learning in technology-and-science Part I: A theory of learning", International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), pp.1223~1235 (1999)
  40. Schaverien, L., "A biological basis for generative learning in technology-and-science Part II: Implications for technology-and-science education", International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), pp.13~35 (2000)
  41. Schwartz, H., "Qualitative sociology: A method to the madness", pp.46~ (1979), The Free Press
  42. Simonton, D. K., "Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian?", Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), pp.309~328 (1999)
  43. Simonton, D. K., "Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the halfcentury mark", Review of General Psychology, 15, pp.158~174 (2011)
  44. Victor, E., "Science for the elementary school" (1989), Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc
  45. Wellington, J. J., "Practical work in school science: Time for re-appraisal, In Practical work in science education: Which way now?", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)