본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혜택적합성에 따른 제휴 프로모션 수단의 유형화에 관한 연구

A Study on The Classifications of Tie-in Promotion Tools according to Benefit Fit

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구는 제휴 프로모션이 제공하는 혜택과 소비자가 추구하는 혜택의 유사성 및 일치성을 의미하는 소비자-제휴 프로모션간 혜택적합성을 실용적 혜택적합성과 쾌락적 혜택적합성으로 나누어 이 두 가지 요인을 기준으로 하여 12가지 제휴 프로모션 수단들(제휴 가격할인, 제휴 쿠폰, 제휴 회원제도, 제휴 콘테스트, 제휴 경품, 제휴 프리미엄, 제휴 지불조건, 제휴 샘플, 제휴 리펀드․리베이트, 제휴 문화이벤트, 제휴 참여이벤트, 제휴 자선이벤트)의 유형화를 시도하였다. 이를 위해 실험을 통해 각 제휴 프로모션 수단별로 소비자-제휴 프로모션간 실용적 혜택적합성과 쾌락적 혜택적합성을 측정하여 군집분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 제휴 프로모션 수단들은 쾌락혜택 적합성 고부가형, 쾌락혜택 적합성 저부가형, 실용혜택 적합성 고부가형, 그리고 실용혜택 적합성 저부가형의 4가지 유형으로 분류되었다. 이러한 4가지 제휴 프로모션 수단 유형은 기존연구에서 제휴 프로모션 형태를 수평적/수직적 또는 기업내/기업간과 같은 기업관점에서의 유형구분 기준개념에 의해 상호배타적으로 구분한 것과 달리, 두 가지 혜택 요인이 양립하면서 하나의 혜택요인이 부가되는 부가혜택형으로 소비자 관점을 현실성 있게 반영하고 있다는 점이 흥미롭다.

Abstract

This study was intended to classify tie-in promotion tools by the criteria of benefit-fit between consumer and tie-in promotions. Tie-in promotion tools include tie-in price reductions, tie-in coupons, tie-in memberships, tie-in contests, tie-in sweepstakes, tangible and intangible tie-in premiums, tie-in payment terms, tie-in samples, tie-in events(culture event, charity event, experience event) and tie-in fund․rebates. The fit between consumer pursuit benefit and tie-in promotion supplying benefit was used as a classification criteria on the basis of Lee et al.'s study in 2011. For the experiment, one stimuli and 12 scenarioes were developed. 100 pieces of data were obtained for each scenario. As a result, benefit fit was subsequently divided into two factors: hedonic-benefit fit and utilitarian-benefit fit. Tie-in promotion tools were then classified into 4 types: high hedonic benefit-added, high utilitarian benefit-added, low hedonic benefit-added, and low utilitarian benefit-added. In previous research, tie-in promotion type was mainly divided by the evaluative criteria on company's viewpoint such as horizontal/vertical or intra-company/ inter-company, which reflects mutual exclusiveness between two criteria. Whereas, in this study, tie-in promotion type was divided by evaluative criteria on consumer's viewpoint such as hedonic- benefit fit/utilitarian-benefit fit. The classifications in this study practically reflect benefit-added of tie-in promotion type superadded one benefit coexisting two benefits.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 안광호, "SPSS를 활용한 사회과학조사방법론, 파주" (2006), 학현사
  2. 이수동, "전사적관점의 마케팅(3판), 파주" (2000), 학현사
  3. 이은미, "제휴 프로모션에 관한 탐색적 연구", 아시아마케팅저널, 13(1), pp.27~50 (2011), 한국마케팅학회
  4. 정훈실, "패션산업을 중심으로 한 디자인 영역간의 콜레보레이션", 복식, 58(6), pp.110~123 (2008), 한국복식학회
  5. 채서일, "마케팅조사론(제3판)" (2007), 비엔앰북스
  6. 하동현, "패밀리 레스토랑에서의 판매촉진에 의거한 세분시장에 관한 연구 -전략적 제휴 혜택의 판매촉진을 중심으로-", 한국식품조리과학회지, 25(5), pp.531~544 (2009), 한국식품조리과학회
  7. Abbott, C. Martine, "Two Could Be More Mighty-than Just One in Promotions", Advertising Age, 51, pp.21~23 (1980)
  8. Bainbridge, Jane, "Brand Fit is Crucial to the Success of Cause Related Ties", Marketing, 3(May), pp.21~ (2001)
  9. Bazerman, Max H, "Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decisions : Judging an Alternative Versus Choosing among Alternatives", Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), pp.220~240 (1992)
  10. Bettman, James R, "Constructive Con sumer Choice Processes", Journal of Consumer Research, 25, pp.187~217 (1998)
  11. Chandon, Pierre, Brian Wansink, "A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness", Journal of Marketing, 64(4), pp.65~81 (2000)
  12. Currim, Imran S, "A Taxonomy of Consumer Purchase Strategiesin a Promotion Intensive Environment", Marketing Science, 10(2), pp.91~110 (1991)
  13. Farris, Paul W, "Advertising and Promotion Management: A Manager's Guide to Theory and Practice" (1983), Chilton
  14. Furse, David H, "A Typology of Individual Search Strategies among Purchasers of New Automobiles", Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), pp.417~431 (1984)
  15. Gray, Robert, "Developing a Tight Fit is Crucial to CRM", Marketing, 4, pp.37~38 (2000)
  16. Gwinner, Kevin, "A Model of Image Creation and Image Transfer in Event Sponsorship", International Marketing Review, 14(3), pp.145~158 (1997)
  17. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, "Hedonic Consumption : EmergingConcepts, Methods and Propositions", Journalof Marketing, 46(3), pp.92~101 (1982)
  18. Hsee, Christopher K, "The Evaluability Hypothesis : An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, pp.247~257 (1996)
  19. Keller, Kevin Lane, "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity", Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp.1~22 (1993)
  20. Kivetz, Ran, "The Idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic : Effort Advantage as a Determinant of Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs", Journal of Marketing Research, 40, pp.454~467 (2003)
  21. Kotler, Philip, "A Framework for Marketing Management" (2001), Prentice-Hall
  22. Kureshi, Sonal, "Joint Sales Promotion : Prospects and Issues", IIMB Management Review, pp.25~30 (2004)
  23. McDonald, Colin, "Sponsorship and the Image of the Sponsor", European Journal of Marketing, 25(11), pp.31~38 (1991)
  24. Murphy, Claire, "Brand Values Can Build on Charity Ties", Marketing, 25, pp.41~ (1999)
  25. Norusis, Marija J, "SPSS User Guide" (1994), SPSS Inc.
  26. Nowlis, Stephen, "Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinantof Consumer Preference Reversals", Journal of Marketing Research, 34, pp.205~218 (1997)
  27. Park, C. Whan, "Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management", Journal of Marketing, 50, pp.135~145 (1986)
  28. Payne, John R, "Behavioral Decision Research : A Constructive Processing Perspective", Annual Review of Psychology, 43, pp.87~131 (1992)
  29. Rich, Philip, "The Organizational Taxonomy Definition and Design", The Academy of Management Review, 17(4), pp.758~781 (1992)
  30. Rothchild Michael L, "Behavioral Learning Theory: ItsRelevance to Marketing and Promotion", Journal of Marketing, 45(Spring), pp.70~78 (1981)
  31. Sawyer, Alan G, "Psychological Perspectives on ConsumerResponse to Sales Promotion," in Researchon Sales Promotion: Collected Papers", pp.47~62 (1984), Marketing Science Institute
  32. Schindler, Robert M, "The Excitement of Getting a Bargain : Some Hypotheses Concerning the Origins and Effects of Smart-Shopper Feelings", Advances in Consumer Research, 16, pp.447~453 (1989)
  33. Shimp, Terence A, "Advertising Promotion and Other Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications, 8th edition" (2008), South-Western Cengage Learning
  34. Simonin, Bernard L, "Is a Company Known by the Company itKeeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects ofBrand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes", Journal of Marketing Research, 35, pp.30~42 (1998)
  35. Sirgy, M, "Self-congruity versus Functional Congruity : Predictors of Consumer Behavior", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), pp.363~375 (1991)
  36. Strang, Roger A, "Sales Promotion-Fast Growth, Faulty Management", Harvard Business Review, 54, pp.115~124 (1976)
  37. Thaler, Richard H, "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice", Marketing Science, 4(Summer), pp.199~214 (1985)
  38. Varadarajan, P. Rajan, "Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion : A Framework for Classification and Additional Perspectives", Journal of Marketing, 50, pp.61~73 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)