미성취 영재를 위한 초등 과학 개별화 교수-학습 프로그램의 개발과 적용 사례 연구
A Case Study on the Development and Implementation of a Elementary Science Differentiated Instruction-Learning Program for the Gifted Underachievers
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a differentiated instruction-learning reflecting various characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers, and thereby help to develop the study attitude and study achievement of the gifted underachievers. To achieve the purpose, a case study on five gifted underachievers who are in 6th grade of elementary school was conducted. By collecting and analyzing a variety of data including standardized tests, interviews with teachers, students, and parents, and observation journals, this researcher examined the characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers. For the development of the program, differentiated strategies were designed according to students' interest and concern, their multiple-intelligence, and their learning styles. As a result of the application of them, a program with a total of 20 sections was finally developed. The result of the application for the differentiated instruction-learning program revealed improvements in their academic achievements. In addition, it was found that their learning motives were improved. The program was also found to affect their self-concept and their attitude toward learning. The study showed that developing an education program for the gifted underachievers should begin from the analysis of each student's characteristics. Also, it was found that a differentiation strategy could become an alternative to apply various characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers to the development of a program. The gifted underachievers' intellectual and definitive characteristics were changed even by the short-term mediation. Therefore, the new issue about educating the gifted is to provide a differentiated instruction-learning program fitting their characteristics and demands and help them exert their potential as best as they could.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a differentiated instruction-learning reflecting various characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers, and thereby help to develop the study attitude and study achievement of the gifted underachievers. To achieve the purpose, a case study on five gifted underachievers who are in 6th grade of elementary school was conducted. By collecting and analyzing a variety of data including standardized tests, interviews with teachers, students, and parents, and observation journals, this researcher examined the characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers. For the development of the program, differentiated strategies were designed according to students' interest and concern, their multiple-intelligence, and their learning styles. As a result of the application of them, a program with a total of 20 sections was finally developed. The result of the application for the differentiated instruction-learning program revealed improvements in their academic achievements. In addition, it was found that their learning motives were improved. The program was also found to affect their self-concept and their attitude toward learning. The study showed that developing an education program for the gifted underachievers should begin from the analysis of each student's characteristics. Also, it was found that a differentiation strategy could become an alternative to apply various characteristics and demands of the gifted underachievers to the development of a program. The gifted underachievers' intellectual and definitive characteristics were changed even by the short-term mediation. Therefore, the new issue about educating the gifted is to provide a differentiated instruction-learning program fitting their characteristics and demands and help them exert their potential as best as they could.
참고문헌 (30)
- Baum, S. M., "Reversing underachievement : Creative productivity as a systematic intervention", Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(4), pp.224~235 (1995)
- 최병연, "미성취 영재를 위한 교육적 중재에 관한 연구", 영재와 영재교육, 6(1), pp.23~48 (2007), 한국영재교육학회
- Choi, H. S., "A study on factors on underachievement of the gifted children in elementary schools", The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 8(2), pp.143~162 (2001)
- Dunn, R. S., "Learning style inventory(LSI)" (1997), Price Systems
- Emerick, L. J., "Academic underachievement among the gifted : Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern", Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), pp.140~146 (1992)
- Galbraith, J., "You know your child is gifted when" (2000), Free Sprit
- 한기순, "성취영재와 미성취영재는 어떻게 다른가?: 학습전략, 동기, 능력신념, 그리고 문제해결성향의 차이 분석", 영재교육연구, 17(1), pp.27~50 (2007), 한국영재학회
- Im, H. C., "Raven intelligence test(Korean edition)" (2004), Korea guidance
- 진석언, "K-CBCL을 통한 성취 영재와 미성취 영재의 문제행동 비교", 특수교육연구, 13(2), pp.231~246 (2006), 국립특수교육원
- Kim, D. H., "Self-directed learning programs for underachieving gifted students", Master, pp.2010
- Kim, H. J., "A study of multiple intelligences and family variables affecting elementary-school children's competence", Doctor, pp.2004
- Kim, Y. J., "A study on the identification of gifted underachievers in science using dynamic assessment", Master, pp.2012
- McCoach, D. B., "Factors that differentiate underachieving students from achieving students", Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), pp.144~154 (2003)
- 남민정, "초등학교 미성취 영재의 사회․정서적 자아개념 향상을 위한 집단상담 프로그램 개발", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(3), pp.207~230 (2009), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- Park, S. Y., "The comprehensive identification of the gifted underachieved children and case studies", Master, pp.2006
- Peterson, J. S., "Gifted achievers and underachievers : A comparison of patterns found in school files", Journal of Counseling and Development, 74(4), pp.399~407 (1996)
- Raven, J., "Raven manual research supplement 3:American norms, neuro- psychological applications" (2000), Oxford Psychologists Press
- Redding, R. E., "Learning preferences and skill patterns among underachieving gifted adolescents", Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), pp.72~75 (1990)
- Reis, S. M., "The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?", Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), pp.152~170 (2000)
- Setting an agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000, "Renzulli, J. S.", University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, ~ (1992)
- Rimm, S. B., "Handbook of gifted education", pp.424~443 (2003), Allyn & Bacon
- Ross, P. O., "National excellence: A case for developing America's talent" (1993), United States Department of Education
- Schultz, R. A., "Understanding giftedness and underachievement : At the edge of possibility", The Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(3), pp.193~208 (2002)
- Shearer, B. C., "Development and validation of a multiple intelligences assessment scale for children", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (1997)
- 송수지, "미성취 영재를 위한 인지？정서적 교육개입 프로그램 개발", 정서·행동장애연구, 23(3), pp.301~326 (2007), 한국정서·행동장애아교육학회
- Supplee, P. L., "Reaching the gifted underachiever" (1990), Teachers College Press
- Tomlinson, C. A., "How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms", pp.2005, Pearson
- Whitmore, J. R., "Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement" (1980), Allyn and Bacon
- Yang, C. K., "The development and validation of learning style inventory for 5th and 6th graders at elementary school", Doctor, pp.2006
- Yoon, Y. H., "The psychological characteristics of gifted children and counseling for emotional development", Korean Journal of Psychology, 19(1), pp.79~101 (2000)