영재 개별화 교육에 관한 과학영재 지도교사들의 인식
The Perception of Gifted Science Teachers Regarding a Individualized Instruction for Scientifically Gifted
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to figure out how much gifted science education teachers in charge of the class realize the necessity of individualized curriculum and program for scientifically gifted, to find out the problems of the gifted science educational institutions from exploring them in depth in the light of the reality in the gifted science educational institutions, and to draw implications about the applicable direction of more aggressive individualized curriculum and program for scientifically gifted. I chose 15 people with the incumbent teachers who have ever taught scientifically gifted and have a degree in the gifted education or science subject education as study participants and had a depth interview with them. According to result of the study, 14 of 15 study participants recognized the necessity of individualized education in science should understand the personal requirements according to the tendency of the gifted students and should be a study led by students themselves. Of the problems in gifted science education, teachers regarded the reduction in the financial support as the biggest problem and the vocation and professionalism of teachers were referred as a very important factor. With constraints of time and space, there were plenty of opinions that can't ignore the influence of educational environment associated with the university entrance examination. There were many opinions that there is excessive expansion of the agencies and the target for gifted students, no standardized measurement tools and programs and the lack of the system for the coherent observation as a teacher. Also, the unified curriculum of gifted science education institutions were pointed out as the problem and the individualized programs which were already under way have a lot of weakness and being offered marginally. Thus, from now on, to apply for individualized education of gifted science, teachers demanded optimized education conditions and consistent policy support, and expressed the opinion that there needs of a possible continuous observation system. Besides, the curriculum and programs matched the needs of the students should be taken priority the most, and there were another answers that fellow learning within the cooperative learning can be an alternative of the individualized. Along with that, there were lots of opinions that the treatment to overcome an inferiority complex according to the individualized should be followed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to figure out how much gifted science education teachers in charge of the class realize the necessity of individualized curriculum and program for scientifically gifted, to find out the problems of the gifted science educational institutions from exploring them in depth in the light of the reality in the gifted science educational institutions, and to draw implications about the applicable direction of more aggressive individualized curriculum and program for scientifically gifted. I chose 15 people with the incumbent teachers who have ever taught scientifically gifted and have a degree in the gifted education or science subject education as study participants and had a depth interview with them. According to result of the study, 14 of 15 study participants recognized the necessity of individualized education in science should understand the personal requirements according to the tendency of the gifted students and should be a study led by students themselves. Of the problems in gifted science education, teachers regarded the reduction in the financial support as the biggest problem and the vocation and professionalism of teachers were referred as a very important factor. With constraints of time and space, there were plenty of opinions that can't ignore the influence of educational environment associated with the university entrance examination. There were many opinions that there is excessive expansion of the agencies and the target for gifted students, no standardized measurement tools and programs and the lack of the system for the coherent observation as a teacher. Also, the unified curriculum of gifted science education institutions were pointed out as the problem and the individualized programs which were already under way have a lot of weakness and being offered marginally. Thus, from now on, to apply for individualized education of gifted science, teachers demanded optimized education conditions and consistent policy support, and expressed the opinion that there needs of a possible continuous observation system. Besides, the curriculum and programs matched the needs of the students should be taken priority the most, and there were another answers that fellow learning within the cooperative learning can be an alternative of the individualized. Along with that, there were lots of opinions that the treatment to overcome an inferiority complex according to the individualized should be followed.
참고문헌 (38)
- "영재교육 최적화를 통한 창조적 인재육성"을 위한 제 3차 영재교육진흥종합계획, "교육부", 교육부, ~ (2013)
- 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획, "교육인적자원부", 교육인적자원부, ~ (2007)
- 시도교육청과 대학의 영재교육기관 운영 효율화 방안 연구, "김미숙", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.연구보고 RR 2008-34 (2008)
- 김성연, "미국 테네시 주 벤더빌트대학교 영재교육센터 프로그램이 우리나라 영재교육에 주는 시사점 탐색", 영재교육연구, 24(2), pp.243~269 (2014), 한국영재학회
- 김순식, "초등예비교사들의 과학영재교육에 대한 신념 연구", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(2), pp.152~158 (2013), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 손정우, "영재 교육과정의 이해", 2012년 영재교육 업무담당자 워크숍 자료집 (2012), 서울특별시과학전시관 영재교육지원센터
- 송인섭, "한국 영재교육의 방향 모색 -융합형 창의 인재 육성-", 영재와 영재교육, 10(3), pp.75~95 (2011), 한국영재교육학회
- 양일호, "과학실험수업에 대한 초등과학영재들의 인식분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 8(2), pp.164~182 (2015), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
- 오필석, "‘좋은’ 과학 수업에 관한 중등 과학 교사들의 사고", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), pp.405~424 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- 이봉우, "과학영재교육에서 교사들이 겪는 어려움", 초등과학교육, 27(3), pp.252~260 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이신동, "영재교육 패러다임의 변화와 전망 - 탁월한 성취 패러다임 -", 영재와 영재교육, 13(2), pp.20~36 (2014), 한국영재교육학회
- 이정규, "우리나라 영재교육 정책의 변화와 향후 전망", 영재와 영재교육, 14(2), pp.49~67 (2015), 한국영재교육학회
- 전은선, "수업형태와 수업환경에 대한 과학영재와 일반 학생들의 선호도 비교", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 8(3), pp.346~354 (2015), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
- 전미란, "과학영재 담당교사의 과학영재교육에 대한 인식 및 현황 조사연구", 영재와 영재교육, 7(2), pp.161~177 (2008), 한국영재교육학회
- 영재교육백서 2004, "조석희", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.연구자료 RM 2004-64 (2004)
- 최병연, "그들은 왜 영재교사를 그만 두었는가? -초등영재교사의 영재교육 경험에 대한 현상학적 분석-", 영재와 영재교육, 13(2), pp.88~107 (2014), 한국영재교육학회
- 태진미, "초‧중등 영재학생들이 지각하는 영재상담 실태 및 요구", 영재와 영재교육, 13(3), pp.149~173 (2014), 한국영재교육학회
- 한국교육개발원, "2014년 한국교육개발원 교육통계", ~ (2014)
- 한국방송공사, "오늘 미래를 만나다: 미래혁명 1부 미래직업", 한국방송공사 (2015.4.26.), ~ (2015)
- 한기순, "국내 영재교육 프로그램의 현황과 과제", 영재와 영재교육, 5(1), pp.114~135 (2006), 한국영재교육학회
- Betts, G. T., "Profiles of the gifted & talented", Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), pp.248~253 (1988)
- Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches" (2007), Sage Publications
- Dai, D. Y., "Three paradigms of gifted education : In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice", Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), pp.151~168 (2013)
- Feldhusen, J. F., "Problems in the identification of giftedness, talent, or ability", Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), pp.149~151 (1984)
- Kaplan, S., "Myth: There is a single curriculum for the gifted!", Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(1), pp.32~33 (1982)
- Kaplan, S., "Advocacy: Projects: Yay or Nay", Gifted Child Today, 31(2), pp.47~53 (2008)
- Marshall, C., "Designing Qualitive research" (2006), Sage
- Passow, A. H., "The nature of giftedness and talent", Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(1), pp.5~10 (1981)
- Polkinghorne, D. E., "Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience", pp.41~60 (1989), Plenum Press
- Renzulli, J. S., "Setting an agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000" (1992), University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
- Renzulli, J. S., "Handbook of gifted education", pp.184~203 (2003), Allyn & Bacon
- Siemer, E. A., "Bored out of their minds: The detrimental effects of no child left behind on gifted children" (2009), The Free Library
- Silverman, L. K., "Counseling the gifted and talented" (1993), Love
- Tannenbaum, A., "Gifted children:Psychological and educational perspectives" (1983), Macmillan
- Tomlinson, C. A., "Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction", Educational Leadership, 57(1), pp.12~16 (1999)
- Tomlinson, C. A., "How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms", pp.2005, Person
- Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative learning and cooperative school", Education Leadership, 45(3), pp.7~13 (1987)
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., "Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students", Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), pp.164~169 (1986)