Clinical Evaluation of Lithium Disilicate Pressed Zirconia and Monolithic Zirconia in Posterior Implant-Supported Prostheses
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses and monolithic zirconia prostheses, which are widely used as posterior implant restorations, after 12 months of follow-up. Material and Methods: A total of 17 patients were treated with 60 implant-supported prostheses. After examination of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index, bleeding index, calculus index, and complications, independent T-test and chi-square test were performed to compare each group (Lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses: n=30, Monolithic zirconia prostheses: n=30). Results: The implant survival rate was 100%. Marginal bone resorption was higher in the monolithic zirconia prostheses group (p<0.05). Probing depth, plaque index, calculus index, and bleeding index were higher in the lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses group (p <0.05). Complications occurred in the monolithic zirconia prostheses group as connector fracture, and in the lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses group as chipping. Conclusion: The periodontal index of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia was slightly worse, but the bone resorption was lower and only one chipping occurred on veneered layer. Therefore, lithium disilicate pressed zirconia is considered as a promising treatment option as much as monolithic zirconia in posterior implant-supported prostheses. However, long-term clinical studies are needed for reliable results (IRB No. PNUDH- 2014-001-MD).
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses and monolithic zirconia prostheses, which are widely used as posterior implant restorations, after 12 months of follow-up. Material and Methods: A total of 17 patients were treated with 60 implant-supported prostheses. After examination of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index, bleeding index, calculus index, and complications, independent T-test and chi-square test were performed to compare each group (Lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses: n=30, Monolithic zirconia prostheses: n=30). Results: The implant survival rate was 100%. Marginal bone resorption was higher in the monolithic zirconia prostheses group (p<0.05). Probing depth, plaque index, calculus index, and bleeding index were higher in the lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses group (p <0.05). Complications occurred in the monolithic zirconia prostheses group as connector fracture, and in the lithium disilicate pressed zirconia prostheses group as chipping. Conclusion: The periodontal index of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia was slightly worse, but the bone resorption was lower and only one chipping occurred on veneered layer. Therefore, lithium disilicate pressed zirconia is considered as a promising treatment option as much as monolithic zirconia in posterior implant-supported prostheses. However, long-term clinical studies are needed for reliable results (IRB No. PNUDH- 2014-001-MD).
참고문헌 (31)
- Al-Amleh B, "Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.641~652 (2010)
- Lim HN, "Spectroradiometric and spectrophotometric translucency of ceramic materials", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.239~246 (2010)
- Bona AD, "Zirconia as a dental biomaterial", Materials, 8, pp.4978~4991 (2015)
- Misch CE, "A bone quality-based implant system: a preliminary report of stage I & stage II", Implant Dent, 7, pp.35~42 (1998)
- Lang NP, "Ligature-induced peri-implant infection in cynomolgus monkeys. Clinical and radiographic findings", Clin Oral Implants Res, 4, pp.2~11 (1993)
- Hermann JS, "Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible", J Periodontol, 68, pp.1117~1130 (1997)
- Schroeder A, "Tissue reaction to a titanium hollow cylinder implant with titanium spray layer surface", SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd, 86, pp.713~727 (1976)
- Takeichi T, "Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 110, pp.455~461 (2013)
- Kim SY, "Fracture strength after fatigue loading of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.369~371 (2016)
- Guess PC, "Effect of veneering techniques on damage and reliability of Y-TZP trilayers", Eur J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.262~276 (2009)
- Menini M, "Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.549~556 (2013)
- Cochran DL, "The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.144~153 (2002)
- 유현상, "임플란트의 collar design이 변연골과 연조직에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 50(1), pp.21~28 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Quirynen M, "Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture", J Clin Periodontol, 18, pp.719~728 (1991)
- Mombelli A, "The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants", Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp.145~151 (1987)
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Oh TJ, "The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?", J Periodontol, 73, pp.322~333 (2002)
- Adell R, "15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Cox JF, "The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.91~100 (1987)
- Lindquist LW, "Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.59~63 (1988)
- Block MS, "Factors associated with soft-and hard-tissue compromise of endosseous implants", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.1153~1160 (1990)
- Sanz M, "Histo-pathologic characteristics of peri-implant soft tissues in Brånemark implants with 2 distinct clinical and radiological patterns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.128~134 (1991)
- Quirynen M, "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
- Gracis SE, "Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.282~291 (1991)
- Isidor F, "Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.1~9 (1997)
- Bremer F, "In vivo biofilm formation on different dental ceramics", Quintessence Int, 42, pp.565~574 (2011)
- Le M, "The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review", J Oral Rehabil, 42, pp.467~480 (2015)
- Molin MK, "Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based denzir 3-unit FPDs", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.223~227 (2008)
- Swain MV, "Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures", Acta Biomater, 5, pp.1668~1677 (2009)
- Guazzato M, "Influence of thickness and cooling rate on development of spontaneous cracks in porcelain", zirconia structures, 2010, pp.55, 306~310
- Sundh A, "Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia allceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing", Dent Mater, 21, pp.476~482 (2005)
