본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Flexural strengths of implant-supported zirconia based bridges in posterior regions

Mansour Rismanchian|Soufia Shafiei|Farzaneh Nourbakhshian|Amin Davoudi
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy Of Prosthodontics)|2014.10|The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics|제6권 제5호|pp. 346-350|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.346

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ZirconiaFlexural strengthImplant-supported prosthesisWeibull modulus

초록

PURPOSE. Impact forces in implant supported FDP (fixed dental prosthesis) are higher than that of tooth supported FDPs and the compositions used in frameworks also has a paramount role for biomechanical reasons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of two different zirconia frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two implant abutments with 3.8 mm and 4.5 mm platform were used as premolar and molar. They were mounted vertically in an acrylic resin block. A model with steel retainers and removable abutments was fabricated by milling machine; and 10 FDP frameworks were fabricated for each Biodenta and Cercon systems. All samples were thermo-cycled for 2000 times in 5-55˚C temperature and embedded in 37˚C artificial saliva for one week. The flexural test was done by a rod with 2 mm ending diameter which was applied to the multielectromechanical machine. The force was inserted until observing fracture. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS software ver.15, using Weibull modulus and independent t-test with the level of significance at α=.05. RESULTS. The mean load bearing capacity values were higher in Biodenta but with no significant differences (P>.05). The Biodenta frameworks showed higher load bearing capacity (F0=1700) than Cercon frameworks (F0=1520) but the reliability (m) was higher in Cercon (m=7.5). CONCLUSION. There was no significant difference between flexural strengths of both zirconia based framework systems; and both Biodenta and Cercon systems are capable to withstand biting force (even parafunctions) in posterior implant-supported bridges with no significant differences.

Abstract

PURPOSE. Impact forces in implant supported FDP (fixed dental prosthesis) are higher than that of tooth supported FDPs and the compositions used in frameworks also has a paramount role for biomechanical reasons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of two different zirconia frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two implant abutments with 3.8 mm and 4.5 mm platform were used as premolar and molar. They were mounted vertically in an acrylic resin block. A model with steel retainers and removable abutments was fabricated by milling machine; and 10 FDP frameworks were fabricated for each Biodenta and Cercon systems. All samples were thermo-cycled for 2000 times in 5-55˚C temperature and embedded in 37˚C artificial saliva for one week. The flexural test was done by a rod with 2 mm ending diameter which was applied to the multielectromechanical machine. The force was inserted until observing fracture. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS software ver.15, using Weibull modulus and independent t-test with the level of significance at α=.05. RESULTS. The mean load bearing capacity values were higher in Biodenta but with no significant differences (P>.05). The Biodenta frameworks showed higher load bearing capacity (F0=1700) than Cercon frameworks (F0=1520) but the reliability (m) was higher in Cercon (m=7.5). CONCLUSION. There was no significant difference between flexural strengths of both zirconia based framework systems; and both Biodenta and Cercon systems are capable to withstand biting force (even parafunctions) in posterior implant-supported bridges with no significant differences.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Scurria MS., "Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival : prostheses and abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.459~464 (1998)
  2. Tan K., "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures(FPDs)after an observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.654~666 (2004)
  3. Raigrodski AJ., "Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures : a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.557~562 (2004)
  4. Christel P., "Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia", J Biomed Mater Res, 23, pp.45~61 (1989)
  5. Tinschert J., "Status of current CAD", CAM technology in dental medicine, 2004, pp.7, 25~45
  6. Filser F., "Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining(DCM)", Int J Comput Dent, 4, pp.89~106 (2001)
  7. Coornaert J., "Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 51, pp.338~342 (1984)
  8. Valderhaug J., "A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics", Acta Odontol Scand, 49, pp.35~40 (1991)
  9. Raigrodski AJ., "The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses : a prospective clinical pilot study", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.237~244 (2006)
  10. Holm C., "Longevity and quality of FPDs : a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.283~289 (2003)
  11. Leempoel PJ., "The survival rate of bridges. A study of 1674 bridges in 40 Dutch general practices", J Oral Rehabil, 22, pp.327~330 (1995)
  12. Kelly JR., "Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway?", J Am Dent Assoc, 139, pp.4S~7S (2008)
  13. Kawai K., "Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials", Oper Dent, 26, pp.396~400 (2001)
  14. Harder S., "Eight-year outcome of posterior inlay-retained all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses", J Dent, 38, pp.875~881 (2010)
  15. Studart AR., "In vitro lifetime of dental ceramics under cyclic loading in water", Biomaterials, 28, pp.2695~2705 (2007)
  16. Jacobs R., "Comparison between implantsupported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.549~554 (1993)
  17. Bacchi A., "Stress distribution in fixed-partial prosthesis and peri-implant bone tissue with different framework materials and vertical misfit levels : a three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Oral Sci, 55, pp.239~244 (2013)
  18. Sailer I., "Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures : 3-year follow-up", Quintessence Int, 37, pp.685~693 (2006)
  19. Okabayashi S., "Influence of proximal supportive design of zirconia framework on fracture load of veneering porcelain", Dent Mater J, 32, pp.572~577 (2013)
  20. Bacchi A., "Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application : 3-D finite element analysis", Acta Odontol Scand, 71, pp.1243~1249 (2013)
  21. Beuer F., "Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design(CAD)", computer-aided manufacturing(CAM)fabricated framework materials, 2008, pp.116, 381~386
  22. Kohorst P., "Loadbearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior four-unit fixed partial dentures with different zirconia frameworks", Eur J Oral Sci, 115, pp.161~166 (2007)
  23. Lüthy H., "Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges", Dent Mater, 21, pp.930~937 (2005)
  24. Salimi H., "Effect of framework design on fracture resistance of zirconium oxide posterior fixed partial dentures", Dent Res J(Isfahan), 9, pp.764~769 (2012)
  25. Sailer I., "Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.383~388 (2007)
  26. Tinschert J., "Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon : 3-year results", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.217~222 (2008)
  27. Tsumita M., "Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.274~285 (2008)
  28. Oh WS., "Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.536~542 (2002)
  29. Oh W., "Influence of connector design on fracture probability of ceramic fixed-partial dentures", J Dent Res, 81, pp.623~627 (2002)
  30. Scherrer SS., "The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.462~467 (1993)
  31. Kelly JR., "Perspectives on strength", Dent Mater, 11, pp.103~110 (1995)
  32. Lundgren D., "Occlusal forces in prosthetically restored dentitions : a methodological study", J Oral Rehabil, 11, pp.29~37 (1984)
  33. Tinschert J., "Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica-and zirconiabased ceramics", J Dent, 28, pp.529~535 (2000)
  34. Kelly JR., "Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo : analysis and modeling", J Dent Res, 74, pp.1253~1258 (1995)
  35. Molin MK., "Threedimensional finite element analyses of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures with different designs", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.89~91 (2007)
  36. Augereau D., "Relevance of the finite element method to optimize fixed partial denture design. Part I. Influence of the size of the connector on the magnitude of strain", Clin Oral Investig, 2, pp.36~39 (1998)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review이정열, 신상완, 김하영pp. 325-332The effects of dentin bonding agent formulas on their polymerization quality, and together with tooth tissues on their microleakage and shear bond strength: an explorative 3-step experimentVahid Rakhshan, Tahereh Sadat Jafarzadeh-Kashi, Mohmmad Erfan, Malihe Ghadiripp. 333-345Characteristics and response of mouse bone marrow derived novel low adherent mesenchymal stem cells acquired by quantification of extracellular matrixRi-Cheng Zheng, 김성균, 이주희, 박지만, 곽재영, 허성주pp. 351-360Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever박지만, 김명래, 박은진, 김선종, 김현주pp. 361-371A comparative study on the bond strength of porcelain to the millingable Pd-Ag alloy홍준태, 신수연pp. 372-378
원문 보기