덴마크 사회민주당의 난민정책 전환: 복지국가와 좌파 정당의 딜레마
The Shift in Denmark's Social Democratic Refugee Policy: Balancing the Welfare State and Left-Wing Ideals
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 덴마크 사회민주당의 난민 정책 전환을 살펴보고, 덴마크의 강경정책이 유럽과 국제사회에 미치는 영향을 분석한다. 덴마크 사회민주당은 메테 프레데릭센 총리 주도로 우파 정부의 ‘보석법’ 도입을 지지했으며, 집권 이후에는 시리아 난민 강제 귀환, 난민 외주화 등 반이민 정서에 토대한 난민 통제 정책을 추진했다. 이는 단기적으로 난민 유입을 감소시키는 성과를 보였지만 국제법 위반과 인권침해 논란을 초래했다. 특히 난민 외주화 정책은 난민 보호책임을 제3국으로 이전하는 시도로, 유럽 내 다른 국가에 새로운 패러다임을 제시했다는 비판을 불러일으켰다. 덴마크 사례는 인도주의와 국제 연대의 가치를 지향하는 좌파 정당이 이민⋅난민 통제를 강화한 특별한 사례이며, 좌파 정부가 복지국가 지속을 명분으로 보수 우파의 이민⋅난민 정책을 수용할 수 있다는 것을 드러냈다. 덴마크 사회민주당 정부의 강경한 난민 통제는 유럽 좌파 정당들이 직면하는 정책적 딜레마를 드러내며, 향후 난민 문제를 둘러싼 유럽 각국의 정책 선택에도 영향을 미칠 가능성이 있다는 우려가 제기된다.
Abstract
This study examines the shift in the Danish Social Democratic Party's refugee policies and analyzes the impact of Denmark's hardline approach on Europe and the international community. Led by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, the party supported the conservative government's introduction of the "Jewelry Law" and, after taking office, implemented refugee control policies rooted in anti-immigration sentiment, including the forced repatriation of Syrian refugees and the outsourcing of refugee processing. While these measures led to short-term outcomes like a reduction in refugee inflows, they also triggered controversies over alleged violations of international law and human rights. The outsourcing of refugee responsibilities to third countries was particularly criticized as an attempt to shift the burden of protection, raising concerns about introducing a new paradigm for other European nations. The Danish case is a notable example of a left-wing party, traditionally committed to humanitarian values and international solidarity, adopting stricter immigration and refugee policies. It demonstrates how a leftist government may justify embracing conservative immigration measures to sustain the welfare state. The Danish Social Democratic government's strict refugee policies highlight the challenges faced by left-wing parties in Europe and raise questions about how they might shape future approaches to refugee issues across the continent.
참고문헌 (34)
- 설동훈, "덴마크의 이민정책과 추진체계", 한국이민학, 3(2), pp.5~23 (2012)
- 강주현, "해외 다문화 사회 통합 사례 연구 : 덴마크 사례를 중심으로", 다문화사회연구, 1(1), pp.105~134 (2008)
- 강주현, "이민 이슈에 대한 정당의 전략적 대응과 이민정책의 변화 : 덴마크와 스웨덴 사례 비교분석", 사회과학논총, 42(2), pp.25~50 (2011)
- AFP., "Italy to send migrants to reception centers in Albania", DW, ~ (2023)
- AFP., "Germany to examine asylum processing in third countries", DW, ~ (2024)
- Bailey-Morley, A., "The rise of the far right in Denmark and Sweden - and why it's vital to change the narrative on immigration", ODI Global, ~ (2022)
- BBC, "Denmark passes ban on niqabs and burkas", DW, ~ (2018)
- Bendixen, M, "Why Europe should avoid modelling its migration policy on Denmark", Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, ~ (2024)
- Bernild, M., "Syrian Refugees in Denmark at Risk of Forced Return:Syria Not Safe for Returnees Despite Recent Danish Claims", Human Rights Watch, ~ (2021)
- Bratu, C., "Spillover effects of stricter immigration policies", Journal of Public Economics, 190, pp.1~22 (2020)
- Del Monte, M., "Solidarity in EU asylum policy", EPRS Briefing, 1~12 (2024)
- Delage, V., "Danish Immigration Policy: A Consensual Closing of Borders", Fondation pour l'innovation politique, 1~79 (2023)
- "Governance of migrant integration in Denmark" (2024)[URL]
- Guàrdia, A, "Mattias Tesfaye: THE BORDER GUARD. Politico 28 Class of 2019", Politico, ~ (2019)
- Hivert, A.-F, "A Copenhague, une conférence sur les partenariats pour l’immigration", Le Monde, ~ (2024)
- Kapitsyn, V. M., "Immigration policy and integration of migrants in the Kingdom of Denmark at the beginning of the XXI century", Baltic Region, 14(2), pp.98~114 (2022)
- Lemberg-Pedersen, M., "Denmark's new externalisation law: motives and consequences", Forced Migration Review, 68 (2021)
- McManus, I., "A Hollow Victory : Understanding the Anti-Immigration Shift of Denmark's Social Democrats", Journal of Contemporary European Research, 18(1), pp.4~31 (2022)
- Nedergaard, P, "The Immigration Policy Turn: Danish Social Democratic Case", Social Europe, ~ (2017)
- Nielsen, M., "Experiences of access to healthcare among newly arrived immigrants in Denmark : Examining the role of residence permit", Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 52, pp.649~659 (2024)
- McDonald, K, "Denmark’s Recent Burqa Ban: Unnecessary, Counterproductive, and Hypocritical", Religious Freedom Institute, ~ (2018)
- Olesen, N., "Danish immigration policy, 1970-1992", pp.2020
- Orhan, A, "From dissent to cohesion: Immigration policy shift and intra-party dynamics in the Danish Social Democratic Party" (2024), Party Politics
- Pace, M, "Denmark's immigrants forced out by government policies", Chatham House Expert Comment, ~ (2021)
- Petersen, K., "The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics", pp.540~558 (2020), Oxford University Press
- "Mattias Tesfaye" (2019)[URL]
- Rathgeb, P., "When do social democratic parties unite over tough immigration policy", West European Politics, 45(5), pp.979~1002 (2022)
- Rausis, F., "Policy diffusion across political ideologies: explaining Denmark's desire to externalise asylum" (2024), West European Politics
- Simonsen, K., "The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics", pp.609~626 (2020), Oxford University Press
- Socialdemokratiet, "Fælles om Danmark: Socialdemocraties Principprogram", Socialdemokratiets Kongres (2017)
- Tan, N., "From Denmark to Damascus: Human rights and refugee law dimensions of Denmark's cessation push" (2021), Verfassungsblog
- Tan, N., "Denmark's Legislation on Extraterritorial Asylum in Light of International and EU Law", Odysseus Network, ~ (2021)
- UNHCR., "News comment by UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi on Denmark's new law on the transfer of asylum-seekers to third countries", DW, ~ (2021)
- Vedel-Hertz, N, "Denmark wants to send back refugees to a dangerous Syria in ruins", Refugees.DK, ~ (2021)