본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

야누스(Janus)의 두 얼굴: 조직의 양손잡이 역량을 통한 중소기업의 성과관리

Janus's Two Faces: SME’s Performance Through Ambidextrous Organization Capabilities

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

기업은 현재의 자원을 효율적으로 이용하는 활용(exploitation)활동과 새로운 기회를 포착하는 탐색(exploration)활동을 동시에 수행하여야 한다. 이렇게 반대되는 두 가지 속성인 활용과 탐색 활동을 동시에 수행하는 기업을 ‘조직의 양면성’ 또는 ‘조직의 양손잡이 역량’(Organizational ambidexterity)이 있다고 하며, 이러한 기업을 양손잡이 조직(Ambidextrous organization)이라고 부른다. 본 연구에서는 기업가적 지향성의 핵심 요소들이 양손잡이 전략을 사용하는 기업들의 기업성과에 영향을 미치는 지에 대해 살펴보고, 더불어 환경적 동태성의 조절 효과에 대하여 실증 분석하였다. 연구 결과 기업은 기업가적 지향성이 양손잡이 조직에서 뚜렷한 기업성과에 유의미한 영향이 있다고 나타났다. 또한 환경적 동태성의 조절효과는 기업가적 지향성과 조직의 양손잡이 역랑과의 관계에 있어 조절효과가 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 벤처기업 및 스타트업을 포함한 중소기업이 성장을 위한 전략적 방향을 설정하는데 있어 현실적인 시사점을 제시해 줄 수 있을 뿐 아니라, 중소기업의 양손잡이 역량과 기업성과간의 관계에 관한 연구에 유의미한 영향을 미칠 수 있는 변수들을 소개하고 영향관계를 분석함으로써 학술적인 기여를 할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract

The firms must perform both exploitation activities that efficiently use current resources and exploration activities that capture new opportunities. A company that simultaneously performs two opposite attributes, exploitation and exploration activities, is called an 'Ambidexerity Organization' or 'Organizational ambidexterity', which is called the Ambidextrous organization. This study examines whether the key factors of entrepreneurial orientation affect a firm's performance using two-handed strategies, and empirically analyzes the moderating effects of environmental dynamics. The results show that the entrepreneurial orientation has a significant effect on a firm's performance in the Ambidextrous organization. In addition, the moderating effect of environmental dynamics showed a moderating effect on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and organizational ambidexterity. This study not only suggests practical implications for SMEs, including venture firms and startups, but also has a significant impact on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and a firm's performance. It is expected to make academic contributions by introducing variables and analyzing influential relationships.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 강한혁, "창업자의 창업동기, 창업가정신 그리고 창업가 역량특성이 창업기업 지속가능성에 미치는 영향: 창업기업 경영성과를 매개로 하여", 벤처창업연구, 14(3), pp.59~71 (2019), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  2. 김성일, "창업보육센터 입주기업 CEO의 기업가정신 및 시장지향성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 창업기업의 지원서비스 활용정도 조절효과를 중심으로", 벤처창업연구, 11(5), pp.1~13 (2016), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  3. 박춘래, "소상공인의 경영전략과 기업성과의 관계에 대한 지원서비스의 매개효과", 재무와 회계정보저널, 9(2), pp.81~99 (2009), 한국회계정보학회
  4. 서창적, "동적역량이 기술혁신의 양면성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 경영진통합, 연결성, 흡수역량의 조절효과", 경영학연구, 44(1), pp.305~330 (2015), 한국경영학회
  5. 오혜미, "여성창업가의 심리적, 환경적, 개인적 특성이 창업동기와 창업성과에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 9(2), pp.45~60 (2014), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  6. 이은아, "스타트업의 기업가지향성과 성과에 관한 연구: 기술지향성과 사회적 자본의 매개효과", 벤처창업연구, 14(2), pp.47~59 (2019), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  7. 정동섭, "혁신형 중소기업의 혁신성과 환경의 동태성이 조직 양면성과 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 인적자원관리연구, 22(1), pp.213~230 (2015), 한국인적자원관리학회[DOI]
  8. Abernathy, W. J., "Patterns of industrial innovation", Technology review, 80(7), pp.40~47 (1978)
  9. Achrol, R. S., "Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels", Journal of marketing research, 25(1), pp.36~50 (1988)
  10. Benner, M. J., "Exploitation, exploration, and process management : The productivity dilemma revisited", Academy of management review, 28(2), pp.238~256 (2003)
  11. Building an ambidextrous organisation, "Birkinshaw, J.", Advanced Institute of Management Research, ~, pp.Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper, (003) (2004)
  12. Brown, S. L., "The art of continuous change : Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations", Administrative science quarterly, 42(1), pp.1~34 (1997)
  13. Covin, J. G., "Strategic management of small rms in hostile and benign environments", Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), pp.75~87 (1989)
  14. Covin, J. G., "The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation", Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(4), pp.677~702 (2012)
  15. Du, J., "Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a"VUCA"environment : Evidence from high tech companies in China", International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), pp.42~52 (2018)
  16. Duncan, R. B., "The ambidextrous organization : Designing dual structures for innovation", The management of organization, 1(1), pp.167~188 (1976)
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments", Academy of Management journal, 32(3), pp.543~576 (1989)
  18. Ensley, M. D., "The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance", Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), pp.243~263 (2006)
  19. Floyd, S. W., "Strategizing throughout the organization : Managing role conflict in strategic renewal", Academy of management review, 25(1), pp.154~177 (2000)
  20. George, G., "Networking strategy of boards : Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises", Entrepreneurship &Regional Development, 13(3), pp.269~285 (2001)
  21. Gibson, C. B., "The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity", Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), pp.209~226 (2004)
  22. Hayes, R. H., "Managing our way to economic decline", Harvard Bus. Rev.;(United States), 58(4) (1980)
  23. He, Z. L., "Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis", Organization science, 15(4), pp.481~494 (2004)
  24. Hult, G. T. M., "Innovativeness : Its antecedents and impact on business performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), pp.429~438 (2004)
  25. Jansen, J. J., "Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation : The moderating role of environmental dynamism", The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), pp.5~18 (2009)
  26. Johanna de Villiers-Scheepers, M., "Antecedents of strategic corporate entrepreneurship", European Business Review, 24(5), pp.400~424 (2012)
  27. Judge, W. Q., "Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental context", Academy of management journal, 34(2), pp.449~463 (1991)
  28. Katila, R., "Something old, something new : A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction", Academy of management journal, 45(6), pp.1183~1194 (2002)
  29. Kollmann, T., "Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap : The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), pp.1001~1026 (2014)
  30. Levinthal, D. A., "The myopia of learning", Strategic management journal, 14(S2), pp.95~112 (1993)
  31. Levitt, B., "Organizational learning", Annual review of sociology, 14(1), pp.319~338 (1988)
  32. Lomberg, C., "Entrepreneurial orientation : The dimensions’ shared effects in explaining firm performance", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), pp.973~998 (2017)
  33. Lubatkin, M. H., "Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms : The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration", Journal of management, 32(5), pp.646~672 (2006)
  34. Lumpkin, G. T., "Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance", Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135~172 (1996)
  35. March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  36. Miller, D., "The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of rms", Management Science, 29(7), pp.770~791 (1983)
  37. Miller, D., "Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms : Two models of strategic momentum", Strategic management journal, 3(1), pp.1~25 (1982)
  38. Morris, M. H., "The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms", Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), pp.247~259 (1987)
  39. O'Reilly, C. A., "The Ambidextrous Organization", Harvard Business Review, 82(4), pp.74~81 (2004)
  40. Raisch, S., "Balanced structures : designing organizations for profitable growth", Long Range Planning, 41(5), pp.483~508 (2008)
  41. Raisch, S., "Organizational ambidexterity : Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators", Journal of management, 34(3), pp.375~409 (2008)
  42. Rauch, A., "Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance : An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future", Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), pp.761~787 (2009)
  43. Simon, H., "Hidden champions of the twenty-first century: The success strategies of unknown world market leaders", Springer Science & Business Media (2009)
  44. Simsek, Z., "A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes", Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), pp.864~894 (2009)
  45. Slevin, D. P., "Entrepreneurial orientation : reviewing three papers and implications for further theoretical and methodological development", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), pp.973~987 (2011)
  46. Smith, W. K., "Toward a theory of paradox : A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing", Academy of management Review, 36(2), pp.381~403 (2011)
  47. Soares, J. L., "Organizational Ambidexterity : A Study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions", Journal of technology management & innovation, 13(3), pp.36~46 (2018)
  48. Tang, J., "Exploring an inverted U-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), pp.219~239 (2008)
  49. Tushman, M. L., "Ambidextrous organizations : Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change", California management review, 38(4), pp.8~29 (1996)
  50. Wei, Z., "Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), pp.832~847 (2014)
  51. Wiklund, J., "Where to from here? EO‐as‐experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), pp.925~946 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)