IT 벤처기업의 양면형 조직과 환경의 동태성 및 기업성과에 관한 실증연구
Ambidexerity Organization, Environmental Dynamism and Firm Performance in IT Venture Firms
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
현대기업은 환경의 동태성이 증가되면서 기업이 지속적인 경쟁우위를 유지하기 위해서는 환경특성의 변화에 적절하게 대응할 수 있는 기업혁신역량이 수반되어야 한다. 이에 따라 IT 벤처기업에서도 탐험이나 활용의 특정한 한 가지 혁신전략이 아닌 두 가지 혁신전략을 적절하게 균형을 윤지하며 동시에 추구하는 양면성 조직을 선택해야하고 이러한 양면성 조직에 적합한 경영관리방식을 채택해야한다. 이와 같은 중요성에도 불구하고 IT벤처기업과 같은 기술혁신형 조직에서 양면성 혁신과 기업성과 및 이의 조절변수로소 환경의 동태성에 대한 이론적․실증적 연구가 부족하다. 본 연구에서는 기존문헌고찰을 통해 IT벤처기업을 대상으로 양면성조직과 이의 중요한 상황요인인 환경의 동태성을 통해 경영성과와의 관계를 밝히고자 한다. 이를 위해 양면성 조직이 기업성과에 미치는 직접효과 및 양면성조직과 환경의 동태성의 상호작용효과를 파악하기 위하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 실증연구는 국내 IT 벤처기업 108개 기업을 대상으로 실증 분석한 결과, 양면성조직과 환경의 동태성은 기업성과에 긍정적인 영향을 주었으며, 양면성조직과 환경 동태성의 적합성은 기업성과를 더 높인다는 사실을 확인할 수 있었다.
Abstract
The adaptation of a company to continuous changes is a subject that the company should always worry to survive in the infinite competition era. Companies always want to lead the market and always make efforts to efficiently achieve their goal. Researchers have applied the tensions of exploration and exploitation to a wide range of organizational phenomena, including environmental dynamism. Exploration and exploitation represent two fundamentally different approaches to organizational learning, recent literature has increasingly indicated the need for firms to achieve a balance between the two. This balanced view is embedded in the concept of firm's performance. However, there is little direct evidence of the positive effect of fit of ambidexterity and environmental dynamism on firm performance. This paper seeks to test the hypothesis by examining how ambidexterity innovation can jointly influence firm's performance in the context of environmental dynamism. Based on a sample of 108 IT venture firms, this paper find evidence consistent with the hypothesis by showing that (1) direct effect of ambidexterity innovation on firm's performance and (2) the interaction between ambidexterity innovation and environmental dynamism is positively related to firm's performance.
참고문헌 (36)
- 배종석, "양면성 혁신전략, 헌신형 인적자원관리 시스템 및 기업성과", 산업관계연구, 20(1), pp.21~52 (2010), 한국고용노사관계학회
- 배종석, "전략적 인적자원관리와 조직의 혁신성과: 탐색적 혁신성과와 활용적 혁신성과의 비교 분석", 인사조직연구, 13(2), pp.147~186 (2005), 한국인사조직학회
- 이홍, "양면성(Ambidexterity)을 통한 역동적 역량의 구현：역사적 조망과 이의 효과적 구축을 위한 핵심과제", 인사조직연구, 17(2), pp.95~124 (2009), 한국인사조직학회
- 이장우, "전략-환경 적합과 기업성과 : 신기술 및 전통적 기술배경 아래에서의 상관관계", 경영학 연구, 23(3), pp.153~154 (1993)
- 하성욱, "중소기업의 기술학습과 기업성과: 우리 나라 전자부품산업 1990～1995", 인사조직연구, 12(특호), pp.1~40 (2004), 한국인사조직학회
- Andriopoulos, C., "Exploitation- exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.696~717 (2009)
- Atuahene-Gima, K., "Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China", Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), pp.1~29 (2007)
- Auh, S., "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity", Journal of Business Research, 58, pp.1652~1661 (2005)
- Beckman, C. M., "The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.741~758 (2006)
- Benner, M. J., "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited", Academy of Management Review, 28, pp.238~256 (2003)
- Cao, Q., "Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.781~796 (2009)
- Duncan, R. B., "Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty", Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp.781~796 (1972)
- Floyd, S., "Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal", Academy of Management Review, 25, pp.154~177 (2000)
- Ghemawat, P., "The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency", Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.59~73 (1993)
- Gibson, C. B., "The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity", Academy of Management Journal, 47, pp.209~226 (2004)
- Gupta, A. K., "interplay between exploration and exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, 4, pp.693~706 (2006)
- He, Z., "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis", Organization Science, 15(3), pp.481~494 (2004)
- Lavie, D., "Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.797~818 (2006)
- Levinthal, D., "Myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.95~112 (1993)
- Lubatkin, M. H., "Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-sized Firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration", Journal of Management, 32(5), pp.646~672 (2006)
- Matsuno, "The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance", The Journal of Marketing, 67(6), pp.457~472 (2002)
- March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
- Miller, D., "Organizations：A quantum view. Prentice-Hall" (1984), Inc., Englewood Cliffs
- Miller, D., "Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms：Two models of strategic momentum", Strategic Management Journal, 3, pp.1~25 (1982)
- Mom, T. J. M., "Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows", Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), pp.910~931 (2007)
- Jaworski, "Market orientation: antecedents and consequences", The Journal of marketing, 42(3), pp.312~323 (1993)
- Justin, J., "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators", Management Science, 52(11), pp.1661~1674 (2006)
- O'Reilly, C. A., "The ambidextrous organization", Harvard Business Review, 82, pp.74~81 (2004)
- O'Reilly, C. A., "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma", Research of Organizational Behavior, 28, pp.185~206 (2008)
- Raisch, S., "Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators", Journal of Management, 34(3), pp.375~409 (2008)
- Rich, P., "The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design", Academy of Management Review, 17, pp.758~781 (1992)
- Schulze, P., "Balancing exploitation and exploration", Academy of Management Proceedings, pp.1~6 (2008)
- Taylor, A., "Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.718~739 (2009)
- Teece, D. J., "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of sustainable enterprise performance", Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp.1319~1350 (2007)
- Tushman, M. L., "Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change", California Management Review, 38, pp.8~30 (1996)
- Venkatraman, N., "Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the soft-ware sector", Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005) (2007)