On the Same Page or Not: Revisiting Interpreting Protocols and Guidelines in Australian Courts and Tribunals
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Interpreter protocols and guidelines represent the common ground on interpreting standards shared among all parties responsible in a multilingual courtroom. Tracing Hale’s (2011) comprehensive examination of interpreter protocols and guidelines in the Australian justice system before 2010, this study revisits publicly available protocols, guidelines and policies in Australian courts and tribunals in the past decade to investigate if there now exists a consensus on what to expect when interpreters perform their duties in courtrooms. The past decade saw the establishment of a national protocol on working with interpreters in court settings and a renewed specialised credential for legal interpreters. Nonetheless, a survey of currently available guidelines and protocols shows the magnitude of work still to be done before jurists and policy makers across Australian jurisdictions are on the same page with regards to a consistent legal interpreting practice nationwide. As Australia continues to lead in the professionalisation of legal interpreting, the Australian experience yields valuable insights for countries in their pursuit of a standardised interpreting service as the arm of law.
Abstract
Interpreter protocols and guidelines represent the common ground on interpreting standards shared among all parties responsible in a multilingual courtroom. Tracing Hale’s (2011) comprehensive examination of interpreter protocols and guidelines in the Australian justice system before 2010, this study revisits publicly available protocols, guidelines and policies in Australian courts and tribunals in the past decade to investigate if there now exists a consensus on what to expect when interpreters perform their duties in courtrooms. The past decade saw the establishment of a national protocol on working with interpreters in court settings and a renewed specialised credential for legal interpreters. Nonetheless, a survey of currently available guidelines and protocols shows the magnitude of work still to be done before jurists and policy makers across Australian jurisdictions are on the same page with regards to a consistent legal interpreting practice nationwide. As Australia continues to lead in the professionalisation of legal interpreting, the Australian experience yields valuable insights for countries in their pursuit of a standardised interpreting service as the arm of law.
참고문헌 (41)
- "Interpreter Protocols" (2020)[URL]
- "Interpreting at AAT" (2020)[URL]
- Angelelli, C. V, "California Standards For Healthcare Interpreters: Ethical Principles, Protocols, and Guidance on Roles &Intervention, In Critical link 4 :Professionalisation of interpreting in the community", selected papers from the 4th international conference on interpreting in legal, health and social service settings, pp.167~177 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- "2016 Census Quickstats: Australia" (2017)[URL]
- Bancroft, M. A., "The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting", pp.229~247 (2015), Routledge
- Bancroft, M. A., "Interpreting in the gray zone : Where community and legal interpreting intersect", Translation and Interpreting, 5(1), pp.94~113 (2013)
- "Community Justice Centres Multicultural Promotion Strategy" (2015)[URL]
- González, R. D., "Fundamentals of court interpretation" (1991), Carolina Academic Press
- Hale, S. B., "Discourse of Court Interpreting : Discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Hale, S. B., "Community Interpreting" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan Limited
- "Interpreter Policies, Practices and Protocols in Australian Courts and Tribunals:A National Survey" (2011)[URL]
- Hale, S. B., "Interpreting Culture : Dealing with Cross-Cultural Issues in Court Interpreting", Perspectives : Studies in Translatology, 22(3), pp.321~331 (2014)
- "Equity before the Law Benchbook" (2018)[URL]
- "Who We Are" (2014)[URL]
- "Cultural Diversity Within the Judicial Context:Existing Court Resources" (2016)[URL]
- "Recommended National Standards for Working with Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals" (2017)[URL]
- "Addendum to the Recommended National Standards for Working with Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals" (2019)[URL]
- Killman, J., "Institutional Translation and Interpreting : Assessing Practices and Managing for Quality", pp.62~83 (2020), Taylor & Francis Group
- Lee, J., "Interpreting reported speech in witnesses’ evidence", Interpreting, 12(1), pp.60~82 (2010)
- "Practice Standards"[URL]
- "Local Court Bench Book" (2017)[URL]
- "Interpreters" (2019)[URL]
- "What to Expect in my Mental Health Tribunal Hearing" (2019)[URL]
- Mikkelson, H., "Introduction to Court Interpreting" (2016), Taylor & Francis Group
- Morris, R., "Doing Justice to Court Interpreting Vol. 26", pp.55~84 (2010), John Benjamins Publishing
- "Language Service Guidelines" (2016)[URL]
- "NAATI Interpreter Certification: Knowledge , Skills and Attributes" (2016)[URL]
- Our Year in Transition:Annual Report 2017-18, "National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters", ~ (2018)
- A Connected Community Without Language Barriers: Annual Report 2018-19, "National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters", ~ (2019)
- "Certification Scheme Design – Summary" (2020)[URL]
- Ozolins, U., "Critical Link 5: Quality in Interpreting - A Shared Responsibility", pp.1~10 (2009), John Benjamins
- Prieto Ramos, F., "Institutional Translation and" (2020), Taylor & Francis Group
- "Guideline: Working with Interpreters in Queensland Courts and Tribunals" (2019)[URL]
- "Use of Interpreters in Domestic and Family Violence Incidents: Best Practice Guideline" (2016)[URL]
- Roberts-Smith, L., "Critical Link 5: Quality in Interpreting - A Shared Responsibility", pp.13~25 (2009), John Benjamins
- Shlesinger, M., "Doing Justice to Court Interpreting" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Taibi, M., "The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies", pp.214~227 (2012), Oxford University Press
- "AUSIT Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct" (2012)[URL]
- "Major Crime Investigative Powers Regulations" (2015)[URL]
- "Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015" (2015)[URL]
- "Consolidated Practice Directions" (2012)[URL]
