사외이사제도에 관한 최근 논의와 그 개선방안
A Recent Discussion about Outside Director System and Reviewing Point
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently Korean Business Association emphasized outside director is not proper in korean business practice and suggested to place it under the voluntary control of separate company in the newly drafted model company law. I do not agree the suggestion of the business association. The outside director system is the only measure to restraint enormous business power of representative director or governing stockholder (company owner). Without outside director system unrestricted power of the company owner could not be properly controlled. Without proper controlling system against business management the company will be an insolvent enterprise, as is the case of Toyota Motor Co. If Korean Business Association continuously asserts the invalidation of outside director system, the system should be strengthened instead of its abolition. If the regulation about ouside director system would be strengthened, the outside director could more easily control the power of business owner based on its guaranteed independence from the business owner. The strengthened measures about outside director are increase of number of ouside director, introduction of executive officer system and forced cumulative voting system etc. However the introduction of new regulation system about outside director could bring about excessive regulative control over business corporation. Excessive regulation against corporation could bring about another problem such as bankruptcy or insolvency. So it is better to introduce such regulations only in the large company in the first step, and enlarge the system in the next step.
Abstract
Recently Korean Business Association emphasized outside director is not proper in korean business practice and suggested to place it under the voluntary control of separate company in the newly drafted model company law. I do not agree the suggestion of the business association. The outside director system is the only measure to restraint enormous business power of representative director or governing stockholder (company owner). Without outside director system unrestricted power of the company owner could not be properly controlled. Without proper controlling system against business management the company will be an insolvent enterprise, as is the case of Toyota Motor Co. If Korean Business Association continuously asserts the invalidation of outside director system, the system should be strengthened instead of its abolition. If the regulation about ouside director system would be strengthened, the outside director could more easily control the power of business owner based on its guaranteed independence from the business owner. The strengthened measures about outside director are increase of number of ouside director, introduction of executive officer system and forced cumulative voting system etc. However the introduction of new regulation system about outside director could bring about excessive regulative control over business corporation. Excessive regulation against corporation could bring about another problem such as bankruptcy or insolvency. So it is better to introduce such regulations only in the large company in the first step, and enlarge the system in the next step.
참고문헌 (38)
- 권경자, "삼성, 유학으로 미래를 다시 세우다" (2010), 윈앤원북스
- 권종호, "일본의 기업지배구조 동향과 우리나라 감사제도의 개선", 상장협, (38) (1999)
- 김선하, "“경영 전반 깊숙이 관여, 비토도 많아,” 중앙일보", ~ (2010)
- 나지홍, "“KB금융 사외이사진, 회장선출 때 주주의견 반영, 지배구조 외부진단 받겠다,” 조선일보", ~ (2009)
- 노일석, "株主會社의 社外理事 -미국의 사외이사를 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.9~300 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 강희갑, "미국의 주식회사의 감사위원회제도에 관한 최근동향과 그 시사점", 상사법연구, 20(4) (2002)
- 김상규, "감사위원회제도에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 20(4) (2002)
- 대한상공회의소, "사외이사제도의 현황과 향후과제", ~ (2001)
- 박강익, "사외이사의 현황과 문제점에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.177~200 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 심재한, "상법개정안에서의 회사지배구조와 집행임원제도", 한림법학FORUM, 19 (2008)
- 안택식, "민주주의와 근로자추천 사외이사", 저스티스, 31(4) (1998)
- 안택식, "기업의 사회적 책임의 실현방향", 상사법연구, 19(1) (1998)
- 안택식, "기업경쟁력 강화를 위한 사외이사 제도의 개선방안", 상사법연구, 21(2), pp.6~287 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 안택식, "사외이사의 책임제한에 관한 연구", 경제법연구, 6(2), pp.199~221 (2007), 한국경제법학회
- 양동석, "사외이사제도 운영현황과 활성화방안", 기업법연구, 8 (2001)
- 유영실, "상근감사와 사외감사제도의 도입의 의의와 운영효율화방안", 상장협, (37) (1998)
- 유지수, "“도요타사태, 국가대응력 증진 기회로,” 한국일보", ~ (2010)
- 이기수, "사외이사제도의 강화를 둘러싼 쟁점", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001)
- 이대희, "사외이사의 역할에 대한 경험적인 연구의 고찰", 상사법연구, 16(2) (1997)
- 이범찬, "“사외이사제도”, 「박길준교수화갑기념논문집」" (1998)
- 사외이사 선임제도 개선방안에 관한 연구, "이형규", 한국상장회사협의회, ~ (2002)
- 전삼현, "사외이사와 감사위원회" (1999), 자유기업센타
- 정찬형, "기업경영의 투명성제고를 위한 주식회사 지배구조의 개선", 상사법연구, 17(1) (1998)
- 정쾌영, "사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방향", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.55~82 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 정혁준, "“황제경경의 부활, 삼성은 어디로 가나,” 한겨레21 제804호", ~ (2010)
- 정호열, "미국의 기업지배구조와 주요주회사법의 현황", 성균관법학, (11) (1999)
- 주성원, "“전경련서 만든 모범회사법논안 논란,” 동아일보", ~ (2010)
- 한국형 사외이사제도에 관한 연구, "한국상장회사협의회", ~ (1999)
- 황유석, "“차량품질문제 계속늘어난다. 도요타 미 지사장 4년전에 보고, 미 청문회사 내부문건 공개---급가속 사망신고 52건으로 늘어,” 한국일보", ~ (2010)
- 황진영, "“729개 안건처리에 반대 단 2표--- 거수기 사외이사 사실로 드러나,” 동아일보", ~ (2010)
- 홍복기, "사외이사제도의 정착과 활성화", 상장협, (37) (1998)
- American Law Institute, "Corporate Directot's Guidebook Third Edition", Bus. Law., 56, pp.1571~ (2001)
- Blair, Margaret M., "Ownership and Control, Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Centry" (1995), The Brookings Institution
- Block, "The Business Judgement Rule-Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Directors" (1998), Aspen Law & Bus.
- Cox, "Corporations" (1997), Aspen Law & Business
- Gelb, Harvey, "Corporate Governance Guideline-A Delaware Response", Wyo. L. Rev., 1, pp.528~ (2001)
- Hamilton, R.W., "The Law of Corporation in a Nutshell" (1996), West Publishing
- Monks, "Corporate Governance" (1995), Blackwell