디지털새싹 교육 캠프 사업의 프로그램 유형별 효과성 분석
Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Digital Sprout Project Education Program
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 경인교육대학교, ㈜휴먼에듀, (사)한국창의정보문학회의 컨소시움이 진행한 디지털새싹 교육 캠프에 참가한 학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고력 사전-사후 검사 결과를 통해 교육 프로그램별 특성과 효과성을 분석하였으며, 연구 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 디지털새싹 교육 캠프에 투입한 프로그램은 참여 학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고력 향상에 효과가 있었다. 둘째, ‘학기 중 교육 캠프’와 ‘여름방학 교육 캠프’의 컴퓨팅 사고력 차이를 비교한 결과 차이가 있음을 확인하였다. 컴퓨팅 사고력의 차이는 단기간 일회성 교육보다는 연계성 있는 장기적인 교육에서 그 효과가 높게 나타남으로써 지속적인 교육이 필요하다는 것을 확인하였다. 셋째, 디지털새싹 교육 캠프 프로그램별로 컴퓨팅 사고력의 주요 역량 향상에 차이를 보였다. 이를 통해 프로그램의 개선과 발전 방향에 대한 시사점을 얻을 수 있었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 디지털새싹 교육 캠프 프로그램의 개선 방향을 제안하여 교육 효과 극대화와 교육정책 수립을 위한 정보를 제공하였다.
Abstract
In this study, the characteristics and effectiveness of each educational program were analyzed through the pre and post-test results of computing thinking skills of students who participated in the Digital Sprout Education Camp conducted by Gyeongin National University of Education, Human Edu, and the Korean Society of Creative Information Literature, and the results of the study are summarized as follows. First, the program put into the digital sprout education camp was effective in improving the computing thinking ability of participating students. Second, a comparison of the difference in computing thinking skills between "education camp during the semester" and "summer vacation education camp" confirmed that there was a difference. It was confirmed that the difference in computing thinking ability was more effective in connected long-term education than in short-term one-time education, so continuous education was necessary. Third, there was a difference in improving the main capabilities of computing thinking skills for each digital sprout education camp program. Through this, implications for the direction of improvement and development of the program could be obtained. Based on these results, the direction of improvement of the digital sprout education camp program was proposed, providing information for maximizing educational effects and establishing educational policies.
참고문헌 (13)
- OECD, "Trends Shaping Education 2022" (2022), OECD Publishing
- "Positive AI Economic Futures 2021" (2021)[URL]
- A Study of the Action Strategy of Future Education for Fostering Creative Talent, "Jaeho Lee", Gyeonggi Do Provincial Institute for Lifelong Learning, ~ (2018)
- Particulars of 2015Revised Curriculum : Practical arts(Techno logy, Home Life), "Ministry of Education", ~ (2015)
- 2022 revised curriculum:General outline, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~ (2022)
- "Digital Sprout Camp, my kid's changed" (2023)[URL]
- Wing, J. M., "Computational thinking", Communica tions of the ACM, 3(17), pp.33~35 (2006)
- "K-12computer science standards" (2011)[URL]
- "Computational Thinking in K–12 Education leadership toolkit" (2011)[URL]
- Junhyung Jang, "Development of a computational assessment tool with problem-solving in everyday life", Doctor, pp.2020
- Tae Ok Song, "The Purpose and Direction of Software Education", Proceeding of the Korean Computer Education Association's Academic Presentation Conference, pp.23~26 (2015)
- Jaeho Lee, "Exploration for the development of a computational thinking assessment tool", Journal of Creative Information and Communication Studies, 4(3), pp.273~283 (2018)
- 이재호, "디지털새싹 사업 교육 프로그램의 효과성 분석 -경기도 지역 초등학교 3~6학년 대상-", 창의정보문화연구, 9(3), pp.263~272 (2023), 한국창의정보문화학회[DOI]